On Monday 26 July 2004 14:36, Stephen Kühn wrote:
On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 03:12, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
On Sun, 2004-07-25 at 18:04, Stephen Kühn wrote:
On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 07:19, Rob Blomquist wrote:
Try using spamc as spamd is just a wrapper for spamc I
understand.
I filter
On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 04:21, Hoyt Bailey wrote:
On Monday 26 July 2004 14:36, Stephen Kühn wrote:
On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 03:12, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
On Sun, 2004-07-25 at 18:04, Stephen Kühn wrote:
On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 07:19, Rob Blomquist wrote:
Try using spamc as spamd is just a
On Sun, 2004-07-25 at 18:04, Stephen Kühn wrote:
On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 07:19, Rob Blomquist wrote:
Try using spamc as spamd is just a wrapper for spamc I understand.
I filter using SA from within Kmail, and when I used spamd, I had my Kmail
come to a halt while messages were being
On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 03:12, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
On Sun, 2004-07-25 at 18:04, Stephen Kühn wrote:
On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 07:19, Rob Blomquist wrote:
Try using spamc as spamd is just a wrapper for spamc I understand.
I filter using SA from within Kmail, and when I used spamd, I had
As per the subject, spamd is now consuming at least 90% of total cpu
time; there is only ONE instance of it running as well; I've modified
the /etc/init.d/spamassassin service startup so that it is forced to
only have one instance of it; why, all of a sudden, is it eating my cpu
alive? The only
Stephen Kühn wrote:
As per the subject, spamd is now consuming at least 90% of total cpu
time; there is only ONE instance of it running as well; I've modified
the /etc/init.d/spamassassin service startup so that it is forced to
only have one instance of it; why, all of a sudden, is it eating my
On Sunday 25 July 2004 08:29 am, Stephen Kühn wrote:
As per the subject, spamd is now consuming at least 90% of total cpu
time; there is only ONE instance of it running as well; I've modified
the /etc/init.d/spamassassin service startup so that it is forced to
only have one instance of it;
On Sunday 25 July 2004 6:29 am, Stephen Kühn wrote:
As per the subject, spamd is now consuming at least 90% of total cpu
time; there is only ONE instance of it running as well; I've modified
the /etc/init.d/spamassassin service startup so that it is forced to
only have one instance of it; why,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On July 25, 2004 15:19:03, Rob Blomquist wrote:
On Sunday 25 July 2004 6:29 am, Stephen Kühn wrote:
As per the subject, spamd is now consuming at least 90% of total cpu
time; there is only ONE instance of it running as well; I've modified
the
On Sun, 2004-07-25 at 23:39, Aron Smith wrote:
It depends on how many rules you have and if they contradict each other
Standard set of rules that comes with SA, and the rulesets from
www.rulesemporium.com; are you suggesting I do away with some of the
rulesets?
stephen kuhn - proprietor
On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 00:18, Chris wrote:
On Sunday 25 July 2004 08:29 am, Stephen Kühn wrote:
As per the subject, spamd is now consuming at least 90% of total cpu
time; there is only ONE instance of it running as well; I've modified
the /etc/init.d/spamassassin service startup so that it
On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 07:19, Rob Blomquist wrote:
On Sunday 25 July 2004 6:29 am, Stephen Kühn wrote:
As per the subject, spamd is now consuming at least 90% of total cpu
time; there is only ONE instance of it running as well; I've modified
the /etc/init.d/spamassassin service startup so
Stephen Kühn wrote:
On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 07:19, Rob Blomquist wrote:
On Sunday 25 July 2004 6:29 am, Stephen Kühn wrote:
As per the subject, spamd is now consuming at least 90% of total cpu
time; there is only ONE instance of it running as well; I've modified
the /etc/init.d/spamassassin service
On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 08:31, frankieh wrote:
Have you considered using amavis-new?
My mailserver is an old 233mmx with 192MB ram and its handling about
1500 mails a day. as well as performing other tasks.
(some days it handles well over 2500 emails, and at least 200 of those
are spam
14 matches
Mail list logo
