On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:27:13 +0100
Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> So do I - it's the only win98 that I have ever had as a stable
> install.
That's our morning funny! Thanks Anne! Long time no see...
--
Joehill
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: http://nodex.sytes.net
**
On Wednesday 16 Jul 2003 2:05 am, Grant wrote:
> I've got to add that I use Win4Lin and I love it.
>
> - Grant
>
So do I - it's the only win98 that I have ever had as a stable
install.
It does very much depend, though, on which windows version you want to
run, what windows file system and what a
It worked fine under windows but I want to get rid of that.
Roly
On Tuesday 15 July 2003 08:44 pm, aron smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 19:30, Roland Hughes wrote:
> > Has anyone managed to get "TaxCut" to work under wine? This would allow
> > me to get rid of my last windows partition.
> > R
On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 11:27, Grant wrote:
> What is VPC?
VPC (Virtual PC) is a software program for Macintosh/Apple computers
that creates a "virtual pc" - an emulated x86 architecture - but with
Windows98 installed (although you can set it up to run almost anything
x86 based); it has been very po
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 19:30, Roland Hughes wrote:
> Has anyone managed to get "TaxCut" to work under wine? This would allow me to
> get rid of my last windows partition.
> Roly
Hell I had enough trouble getting Tax Cut to work under Win98
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
G
Has anyone managed to get "TaxCut" to work under wine? This would allow me to
get rid of my last windows partition.
Roly
On Tuesday 15 July 2003 06:28 pm, Paul Kaplan wrote:
> I got wine to run Excel 97 & Word 97 (at least for what I was doing using
> the RPMs that came with Mandrake 9.0, but som
On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 09:51, Harv Nelson wrote:
> I'm one step closer to dumping the Windows box altogether.
>
> Is there any advantage to "Win4Lin" over "WINE"? Are they pretty much
> the same thing?
>
> Is there any advantage to using one over the other ... or both?
>
> Any other cautions, c
day, July 15, 2003 10:27 PM
Subject: RE: [newbie] Win4Lin vs WINE
> What is VPC?
>
> > > So Win4Lin is like VPC for Win?
> >
> > Basically. It can't run linux inside of windows like VPC can, and the
> > core code is different. AFAIK, It does the same thing. Corre
What is VPC?
> > So Win4Lin is like VPC for Win?
>
> Basically. It can't run linux inside of windows like VPC can, and the
> core code is different. AFAIK, It does the same thing. Correct me if I'm
> wrong.
>
> John Drouhard
>
> --
> Tue Jul 15 20:11:55 CDT 2003
> -
I got wine to run Excel 97 & Word 97 (at least for what I was doing using the
RPMs that came with Mandrake 9.0, but something got broken in LM9.1 I do use
Crossover Office for several windows apps at work and it does an impressive
job under 9.1. Office XP apps are at least as fast as under W2K
On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 10:42, Cody Harris wrote:
> So Win4Lin is like VPC for Win?
No. VMWare is like VPC; WINE and Win4Lin are "layers" that allow you to
natively run the Windows applications.
--
Wed Jul 16 11:25:00 EST 2003
11:25:00 up 2 days, 3:28, 2 users, load average: 0.52, 0.65, 0.56
-
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 21:42:06 -0300
"Cody Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So Win4Lin is like VPC for Win?
Basically. It can't run linux inside of windows like VPC can, and the
core code is different. AFAIK, It does the same thing. Correct me if I'm
wrong.
John Drouhard
--
Tue Jul 15 20:11:
I've got to add that I use Win4Lin and I love it.
- Grant
>
> > I'm one step closer to dumping the Windows box altogether.
> >
> > Is there any advantage to "Win4Lin" over "WINE"? Are they pretty much
> > the same thing?
> >
> > Is there any advantage to using one over the other ... or both
So Win4Lin is like VPC for Win?
- Original Message -
From: "John Drouhard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 9:37 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Win4Lin vs WINE
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 18:51:46 -0500
> Harv Nelson <[EMAIL P
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 18:51:46 -0500
Harv Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm one step closer to dumping the Windows box altogether.
>
> Is there any advantage to "Win4Lin" over "WINE"? Are they pretty much
> the same thing?
>
> Is there any advantage to using one over the other ... or both?
I'm one step closer to dumping the Windows box altogether.
Is there any advantage to "Win4Lin" over "WINE"? Are they pretty much
the same thing?
Is there any advantage to using one over the other ... or both?
Any other cautions, caveats, evaluations, comments you'd care to give
are much appre
On Fri, 2003-03-14 at 04:12, Greg Meyer wrote:
> In my mind, the most cost effective sure thing is Win4Lin, assuming one does
> not have to run one of the NT flavors of Windows. I believe that VMWare is
> really aimed at the developer market so that applications can be easily
> tested for comp
On Thursday 13 March 2003 10:58 am, Brian wrote:
> I guess I don't understand why you would choose one of these over the
> other. I am familiar with VMWare, and that seems to make the most sense
> if you need to run a particular Windows (or other OS) application within
> Linux. I know it is a vir
On Thursday 13 March 2003 10:58 am, Brian wrote:
> I guess I don't understand why you would choose one of these over the
> other. I am familiar with VMWare, and that seems to make the most sense
> if you need to run a particular Windows (or other OS) application within
> Linux. I know it is a vir
I guess I don't understand why you would choose one of these over the
other. I am familiar with VMWare, and that seems to make the most sense
if you need to run a particular Windows (or other OS) application within
Linux. I know it is a virtual machine and will let you connect back to
the pri
20 matches
Mail list logo
