On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 13:43, daRcmaTTeR wrote:
Tom,
Now you've got me wondering. I had been using Reiser and hadn't had any
trouble at all, but a few months back I bought a brand new Dell and when I
loaded Mandrake on it I chose XFS as opposed to Reiser. Mostly because of
what I'd been
On Wednesday 29 May 2002 05:37 pm, Franki wrote:
I too am a proponent of reiserfs...
I tried XFS with 8.2 but the inability of a boot disk really caused
me problems, (my existing IBM300PL home server won't boot from the
40 gig IBM hard disk by itself (only see's it as a 8.4gig.) so the
only
I tried XFS with 8.2 but the inability of a boot disk really caused me
problems, (my existing IBM300PL home server won't boot from the 40 gig IBM
hard disk by itself (only see's it as a 8.4gig.) so the only way to get
linux up and running is via boot disk.. (linux then see's the full 40gig
Oops! I mean I put -8.2- on two desktops and a laptop using XFS on
all three. No problems with boot disks.
Miark
I've installed XFS on two desktops and a laptop, using XFS on all three.
It successfully made a boot disk for me every time.
Miark
Want to buy your Pack or Services from
On Wed, 29 May 2002, Tom Brinkman wrote:
FWIW, since I asked, after 3 experiences with XFS, I'm back to
good 'ol tried'n true ReiserFS for all my Linux partitions. Sort'a
way OT, I got a 350W inverter for $47 from Wally World a few months
ago. It'll run a 19 TV for 5 to 6 hours off
On Wednesday 29 May 2002 12:43 pm, daRcmaTTeR wrote:
Tom,
Now you've got me wondering. I had been using Reiser and hadn't had
any trouble at all, but a few months back I bought a brand new Dell
and when I loaded Mandrake on it I chose XFS as opposed to Reiser.
Mostly because of what I'd been
On Wed, 29 May 2002 13:32:37 -0500
Tom Brinkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heck if I know!! ;) All I know is I experienced some little
gremlins here'n there with XFS, and I don't with Reiser. Mostly file
transfer problems to vfat partitions, and occasional FS error
messages while
