On Tue, 28 Aug 2001 06:12, Randy Kramer wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm starting to do pretty much everything from the command line now, to
the point that I don't even touch XWindows for most of the day. While
this is cool and exciting, I'm curious as to people's opinions on what
Does anybody have an Emacs quick reference file? If you do, please share.
TIA,
Jen
On Monday 27 August 2001 17:25, you wrote:
On Tuesday 28 August 2001 04:34, Paul wrote:
In reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s words, written Mon, 27 Aug 2001
15:01:00 -0400 (EDT)
a few days and it seems to
On Tuesday 28 August 2001 14:05, jennifer wrote:
Does anybody have an Emacs quick reference file? If you do, please share.
On my computer I issued the following commands:
narfi@/[1042] locate refcard.ps
/usr/share/emacs/20.7/etc/refcard.ps
narfi@/[1043] rpm -q -f
Good afternoon folks,
I'm starting to do pretty much everything from the command line now, to the
point that I don't even touch XWindows for most of the day. While this is cool
and exciting, I'm curious as to people's opinions on what text editor I should
use for programming, file editing,
don't need
vi, IMHO.
Tim
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 12:01 PM
Subject: [newbie] Xemacs vs. emacs vs. vi
Good afternoon folks,
I'm starting to do pretty much everything from the command line now, to
the
point that I
In reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s words, written Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:01:00
-0400 (EDT)
a few days and it seems to me that vi is a lot easier thus far. The
CTRL-D/DEL
thing in emacs is a real hassle. I know that vi is intended for C
programming
and emacs for command interpreting/bash
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm starting to do pretty much everything from the command line now, to the
point that I don't even touch XWindows for most of the day. While this is cool
and exciting, I'm curious as to people's opinions on what text editor I should
use for programming, file
Oops, sorry, if you want to use it from the command line (without X) it
won't work. I'd use jstar from the command line, but I'd still use
nedit in X, even invoking it from the command line.
Randy Kramer
Randy Kramer wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm starting to do pretty much
What's the difference between Xemacs and emacs?
- Isaac
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com
On Tuesday 28 August 2001 04:34, Paul wrote:
In reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s words, written Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:01:00
-0400 (EDT)
a few days and it seems to me that vi is a lot easier thus far. The
CTRL-D/DEL
thing in emacs is a real hassle. I know that vi is intended for C
programming
What's the difference between Xemacs and emacs?
There are a few differences. Xemacs started life out as a separate
source code fork from GNU Emacs - it was called Lucid Emacs back
then. Since then, the code bases have merged somewhat, and there
aren't too many differences between the two. Some
and emacs for command interpreting/bash programming, so is it best for me to
use both? What are the advantages of each tool under different circumstances?
I'm not sure where you got that idea - see my other message. My recommend-
ation - use whatever you feel more comfortable with. For
12 matches
Mail list logo
