Re: [newbie] against the war!

2003-02-03 Thread Ronald J. Hall
On Monday 03 February 2003 04:30 am, Malcolm Candlish wrote: Ronald, Why not send it to your very nice dear friend Saddam, to see if he can offer you a little help. I sure he would be very pleased. Saddam is not my friend, nor a friend to anyone in the civilized world... On the other hand,

[newbie] against the war!

2003-01-31 Thread Frank Mertens
The United States are about to start a war without of consideration for international law. If you want to speak against it, the UN are collecting signatures to work against this tragically event. Please do copy this e-mail to a new mail, sign it at the end of the attached list and send it to all

Re: [newbie] against the war!

2003-01-31 Thread Lanman
Mark; Could you take a moment to define your use of the word Balls? I'm hoping that your intended use of the word was in reference to the fact that this list is not a political group, and therefore is probably unable to effect a change in the foreign policies of the United States where war is the

Re: [newbie] against the war!

2003-01-31 Thread JM5379
: [newbie] against the war! Mark; Could you take a moment to define your use of the word Balls? I'm hoping that your intended use of the word was in reference to the fact that this list is not a political group, and therefore is probably unable to effect a change in the foreign policies

Re: [newbie] against the war!

2003-01-31 Thread Benjamin Jeeves
and in a public forum (or amy discourse in any forum, for that matter). --- Original Message --- From: Lanman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] against the war! Mark; Could you take a moment to define your use of the word Balls? I'm hoping that your intended use

Re: [newbie] against the war!

2003-01-31 Thread Todd Slater
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 07:14, Mark Weaver wrote: In all seriousness your time and energy would be far better spent sending these sigs to the US congress and senate and communicating your feelings to them rather then sending them to a body that has no balls. Let Washington know and

Re: [newbie] against the war!

2003-01-31 Thread Anne Wilson
On Friday 31 Jan 2003 3:16 pm, Tony S. Sykes wrote: I agree, no more posts on the subject please. Lets make this the last. In any case, do the math. Your name, if you sign, after only a couple more iterations appears on more than 1700 different 'petitions'. Do you seriously expect anyone to

Re: [newbie] against the war!

2003-01-31 Thread Ronald J. Hall
On Friday 31 January 2003 06:54 am, Frank Mertens wrote: The United States are about to start a war without of consideration for international law. If you want to speak against it, the UN are collecting signatures to work against this tragically event. Please do copy this e-mail to a new mail,

Re: [newbie] against the war!

2003-01-31 Thread Mark Weaver
Frank Mertens wrote: The United States are about to start a war without of consideration for international law. If you want to speak against it, the UN are collecting signatures to work against this tragically event. Please do copy this e-mail to a new mail, sign it at the end of the attached

Re: [newbie] against the war!

2003-01-31 Thread Mark Weaver
Lanman wrote: Mark; Could you take a moment to define your use of the word Balls? I'm hoping that your intended use of the word was in reference to the fact that this list is not a political group, and therefore is probably unable to effect a change in the foreign policies of the United States

Re: [newbie] against the war!

2003-01-31 Thread Mark Weaver
Todd Slater wrote: On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 07:14, Mark Weaver wrote: In all seriousness your time and energy would be far better spent sending these sigs to the US congress and senate and communicating your feelings to them rather then sending them to a body that has no balls. Let Washington

Re: [newbie] against the war!

2003-01-31 Thread Mark Weaver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lanman, I interpreted his disparagement to apply to the UN rather than to us. Still, clarity is a good thing when insulting randomly and in a public forum (or amy discourse in any forum, for that matter). Sorry for any confusion...My intent wasn't to disparage anyone.

Re: [newbie] against the war!

2003-01-31 Thread Mark Weaver
Dick Mazierski wrote: Frank Mertens wrote: The United States are about to start a war without of consideration for international law. If you want to speak against it, the UN are collecting signatures to work against this tragically event. Please do copy this e-mail to a new mail, sign it at the

Re: [newbie] against the war!

2003-01-31 Thread Frank Mertens
Oh, I'm sorry. More discipline in the future=) Or like Schlingensief loved to say: You have to risk 100 mistakes to find 2 new genius ways to do things right. On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 13:14, Mark Weaver wrote: Frank Mertens wrote: The United States are about to start a war without of