Would it not be easier to urpme the gtk and then urpmi the gtk
specifying the newer version in the command line?
Tony.
-Original Message-
From: John Richard Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
: [newbie] D4X Compile
Charles A Edwards wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 19:07:25 +0100
John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what should I do then,
a urpmi , or better still where can I download pucka version with my
d4x on M9.0
Have you tried rebuilding d4x Since you did
if I send you a CD with all the MDK 9.1
updates on.
-Original Message-
From: John Richard Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 2:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
Tony S. Sykes wrote:
Would it not be easier to urpme the gtk and then urpmi
? It might be easier if I send you a CD with all the MDK 9.1 updates on.
-Original Message-
From: John Richard Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 2:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
Tony S. Sykes wrote:
Would it not be easier to urpme
Charles A Edwards wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 18:29:51 +0100
John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can you help me once more and give me the precise url for
d4x-2.4.1-2mdk.src.rpm
ftp://sunsite.uio.no/pub/unix/Linux/Mandrake/Mandrake-devel/contrib/SRPMS/
or you ca use another
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 11:03:13 +0100
John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So it looks to me as though my version of the gtk libraries is going
to have to be updated somehow ?
John I am running the same versions as you on my 9.1 system.
It is more apt that 1 are all of your gtk+2 rpms
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 11:03:13 +0100
John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
So it looks to me as though my version of the gtk libraries is going
to have to be updated somehow ?
Nah, could be that the D4X package is looking in the wrong place for
your GTK libs. It shouldn't be doing this
Charles A Edwards wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 11:03:13 +0100
John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So it looks to me as though my version of the gtk libraries is going
to have to be updated somehow ?
John I am running the same versions as you on my 9.1 system.
It is more apt that 1
JoeHill wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 11:03:13 +0100
John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
So it looks to me as though my version of the gtk libraries is going
to have to be updated somehow ?
Nah, could be that the D4X package is looking in the wrong place for
your GTK libs. It
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 19:07:25 +0100
John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what should I do then,
a urpmi , or better still where can I download pucka version with my
d4x on M9.0
Have you tried rebuilding d4x Since you did the --force install of gtk?
Hell, if it comes to it I can send
Charles A Edwards wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 19:07:25 +0100
John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what should I do then,
a urpmi , or better still where can I download pucka version with my
d4x on M9.0
Have you tried rebuilding d4x Since you did the --force install of gtk?
Hell,
FemmeFatale wrote:
At 02:37 PM 6/10/2003 -0400, you wrote:
You need gtk+2.0, libgtk+2.0_0, and libgtk+2.0_0-devel
BTW, when you are nor sure of the package name try using
urpmq --fuzzy name
Charles
Thanks Charles,
Now this is how it went,
first,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# rpm -qa | grep
John,
Looks like your gtk version is not upto date.
Tony.
-Original Message-
From: John Richard Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 4:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
FemmeFatale wrote:
At 02:37 PM 6/10/2003 -0400, you wrote
Title: RE: [newbie] D4X Compile
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Richard Smith
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
FemmeFatale wrote:
At 02:37 PM 6/10/2003 -0400
Title: RE: [newbie] D4X Compile
Dennis,
You
being in the military do you play Army Operations?
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, June
11, 2003 5:14 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
RE: [newbie] D4X Compile
-Original
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 16:51:15 +0100
John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
which still leaves me scratching my head, how to solve the gtk
dependency ?
It's some other gtk package ?
Actually the problem is that you have too much installed.
When you try to rebuild d4x it is linking to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Richard Smith
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
FemmeFatale wrote:
At 02:37 PM 6/10/2003 -0400, you wrote:
You
Charles A Edwards wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 16:51:15 +0100
John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
which still leaves me scratching my head, how to solve the gtk
dependency ?
It's some other gtk package ?
Actually the problem is that you have too much installed.
When you try to
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 18:29:51 +0100
John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can you help me once more and give me the precise url for
d4x-2.4.1-2mdk.src.rpm
ftp://sunsite.uio.no/pub/unix/Linux/Mandrake/Mandrake-devel/contrib/SRPMS/
or you ca use another mirror of your choice.
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 18:29:51 +0100
John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can you help me once more and give me the precise url for
d4x-2.4.1-2mdk.src.rpm
ftp://sunsite.uio.no/pub/unix/Linux/Mandrake/Mandrake-devel/contrib/SRPMS/
or you ca use another mirror of your choice.
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 12:26 pm, Tony S. Sykes wrote:
Dennis,
You being in the military do you play Army Operations?
humongous snip
No, sorry, I don't have the time. Full time job and full time Cabinetry and
repair business at home.
--
Dennis M. linux user #180842
Want to buy your Pack
The urpmi install version of D4X on M9.1 is broken, and will not resume
on any site that has resume facilities, so I'm trying to roll my own.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cd /pk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pk]# ls
= d4x-2.4-0.1mdk.src.rpm d4x-2.4.1-fr1.src.rpm
d4x-2.03-1mdk.src.rpm
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 18:59:18 +0100
John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
so which packages do I need to complete the compile satisfactorilly.
I *think* you need to refer to it as gtk, not GTK, ie. it is case
sensitive.
Try this: rpm -qa | grep gtk
Most likely what you need is
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 18:59:18 +0100
John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so which packages do I need to complete the compile satisfactorilly.
You need gtk+2.0, libgtk+2.0_0, and libgtk+2.0_0-devel
BTW, when you are nor sure of the package name try using
urpmq --fuzzy name
Charles
At 02:37 PM 6/10/2003 -0400, you wrote:
You need gtk+2.0, libgtk+2.0_0, and libgtk+2.0_0-devel
BTW, when you are nor sure of the package name try using
urpmq --fuzzy name
Charles
So thats what Fuzzy Does TY!!! omg the freaking INFO file sucks on
that one... i had a helluva time trying
I have just started to try/use d4x, mainly cause I heard it resumes
downloads. I just had 27% of a iso downloaded, when I had to restart (had to
get some info out of a winfax fax view file, so I had to reboot into win).
anyway, when I restarted d4x, it had saved the info about the ISO file it
et wrote:
I have just started to try/use d4x, mainly cause I heard it resumes
downloads. I just had 27% of a iso downloaded, when I had to restart (had to
get some info out of a winfax fax view file, so I had to reboot into win).
anyway, when I restarted d4x, it had saved the info about the
On Friday 07 February 2003 04:41 pm, John Richard Smith wrote:
et wrote:
I have just started to try/use d4x, mainly cause I heard it resumes
downloads. I just had 27% of a iso downloaded, when I had to restart (had
to get some info out of a winfax fax view file, so I had to reboot into
On Friday February 7 2003 04:06 pm, et wrote:
On Friday 07 February 2003 04:41 pm, John Richard Smith wrote:
et wrote:
I have just started to try/use d4x, mainly cause I heard it
resumes downloads. I just had 27% of a iso downloaded, when I
had to restart (had to get some info out of a
On Friday 07 February 2003 01:06 pm, et wrote:
On Friday 07 February 2003 04:41 pm, John Richard Smith wrote:
et wrote:
I have just started to try/use d4x, mainly cause I heard it resumes
downloads. I just had 27% of a iso downloaded, when I had to restart
(had to get some info out of a
et wrote:
On Friday 07 February 2003 04:41 pm, John Richard Smith wrote:
et wrote:
I have just started to try/use d4x, mainly cause I heard it resumes
downloads. I just had 27% of a iso downloaded, when I had to restart (had
to get some info out of a winfax fax view file, so I had to
As a minor matter of interest to the developers of D4X.
D4X on reconnect only produces errors in download speeds it reports, and
I know this because I run gkrellm side by side to check. The problem does
not occure on first connect , only reconnect after a cutoff.
John
--
John Richard Smith
32 matches
Mail list logo
