On Fri, 2 Apr 2004 11:11:40 +0100
Anne Wilson disseminated the following:
If you can believe that you can believe anything. There are flaws in
XP that have been known since the days of NT4. OK - security patches
exist for most of them, but 2 releases on, why were they not fixed in
the
Thought this might be an interesting read to some of you.
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1557749,00.asp
The one thing I didn't get from the article was if they factored in the
amount of applications that ship with Linux vs. the amount of
applications that ship with windows. They did
On Friday 02 April 2004 08:30 am, JoeHill wrote:
It's a mildly interesting statistic that Mandrake came out not so near the
top, but hey, we're competing with Red Hat, Debian and Suse here, these are
tough competitors, so I'm not surprised. They have serious financial and/or
human resources
On Friday 02 April 2004 15:44, Bryan Phinney wrote:
Last, I would take with several grains of salt, anything that any of the
analyst companies put out regarding Linux and Microsoft products. We have
seen several get bought and steer studies in the direction that MS wants
as well as refusing
On Friday 02 April 2004 05:58 pm, Glenn wrote:
I was thinking this analyst company sounded familiar and then it occurred
to me that Forrester Research is the company who changed its policy about
sponsored research studies when they got caught last year, right?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 02 April 2004 23:17, Josh wrote:
Thought this might be an interesting read to some of you.
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1557749,00.asp
The one thing I didn't get from the article was if they factored in
the amount of
Thought this might be an interesting read to some of you.
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1557749,00.asp
--
rgds
Frank Hauptle (aka Franki)
For free scripts, online webmaster tools, HTML, XHTML, Perl PHP
tutorials and stuff, visit:
http://htmlfixit.com Free web developer resources.
