Re: [newbie] pretty graphical editor

2001-07-29 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan
Jed has always been my favourite. It comes from the same family as Emacs, but it is small and light. Text colouring is turned on by default. On Sun, 29 Jul 2001 01:36, Randy Kramer wrote: > Romanator wrote: > > Check out Cooledit. > > Roman, > > Actually, I did once, but I'm looking again. I gu

Re: [newbie] pretty graphical editor

2001-07-28 Thread Randy Kramer
Randy Kramer wrote: > The white text on a black background will kill me -- I can't (quickly) > find a way to change it to black text on a white background. Is there a > way? Ok, I found two ways to do it. CoolEdit looks somewhat broken in Mandrake 7.2 -- when you call up help it gives some erro

Re: [newbie] pretty graphical editor

2001-07-28 Thread Randy Kramer
Romanator wrote: > Check out Cooledit. Roman, Actually, I did once, but I'm looking again. I guess the scripts are the macros. The white text on a black background will kill me -- I can't (quickly) find a way to change it to black text on a white background. Is there a way? Didn't look for

Re: [newbie] pretty graphical editor

2001-07-27 Thread Paul
It was Sat, 28 Jul 2001 02:58:36 -0400 when Bryan Tyson wrote: >> I use ViM. It's helpful by changing the color letting me know my >> tags are incorrect or I forgit something like a { or I haven't closed >> the HTML with a > or mess like that. I really like it. But I'm a vi >> guy. > >Is the

Re: [newbie] pretty graphical editor

2001-07-27 Thread Paul
It was Sat, 28 Jul 2001 02:58:36 -0400 when Bryan Tyson wrote: >> I use ViM. It's helpful by changing the color letting me know my >> tags are incorrect or I forgit something like a { or I haven't closed >> the HTML with a > or mess like that. I really like it. But I'm a vi >> guy. > >Is the

Re: [newbie] pretty graphical editor

2001-07-27 Thread Bryan Tyson
On Friday 27 July 2001 14:57, Tim wrote: > I use ViM. It's helpful by changing the color letting me know my > tags are incorrect or I forgit something like a { or I haven't closed > the HTML with a > or mess like that. I really like it. But I'm a vi > guy. Is there a command to turn on the

Re: [newbie] pretty graphical editor

2001-07-27 Thread Romanator
Check out Cooledit. Roman Randy Kramer wrote: > > I tried Kwrite, and it's not bad. I switched to nedit because it has: > > -soft wrap (they call it continuous) > -macros > > However, the search and replace in kwrite is nicer than that in nedit if > you want to accept changes one at a time -

Re: [newbie] pretty graphical editor

2001-07-27 Thread Randy Kramer
I tried Kwrite, and it's not bad. I switched to nedit because it has: -soft wrap (they call it continuous) -macros However, the search and replace in kwrite is nicer than that in nedit if you want to accept changes one at a time -- nedit doesn't highlight the "found" selection. Also, kwrite lo

Re: [newbie] pretty graphical editor

2001-07-27 Thread bpremeaux
Have you taken a look at VIM? Its GUI version of VI. Barry On Fri, 27 July 2001, Kevin Fonner wrote: > > I know I asked this question once and got some reponses but if it ok I > would like to just check once more but being a little clearer. Perhaps > I am contaminated coming from the windo

Re: [newbie] pretty graphical editor

2001-07-27 Thread Roger Sherman
Try Kwrite (listed as Advanced Editor in the menu, under Applications>Editors)...you might have to enable code highlighting, but it does the job for me... On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Kevin Fonner wrote: > I know I asked this question once and got some reponses but if it ok I > would like to just check

[newbie] pretty graphical editor

2001-07-27 Thread Kevin Fonner
I know I asked this question once and got some reponses but if it ok I would like to just check once more but being a little clearer. Perhaps I am contaminated coming from the windows world but I like it when I am programming in a graphical editor and the editor colorizes on my code depending