it has to be a configuration failure somewhere, i just switched the lan
card on the linux box and it still doesnt work.
has anybody suggestions on common conf. mistakes in win2000 and linux ?
--quay
At 17:29 04.03.2001 -0500, you wrote:
Go back to basics...
With your lan card you should have gotten a utility disk.
On that disk are two important programs (assuming that you are using a
10base2/10baseT card).
The first program sets up the hardware on the lan card. It allocates
IRQ's/IO, etc
ya ur ip... have to be different
-DukeMaN
--- Antonio De Luna
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the probles is that you're using the same ip
on both machines.
Quaylar wrote:
hi all !
i´m reposting because i still have my win-linux
lan problem.
let me describe:
i have 1
to all accidentally reading this : the ips ARE DIFFERENT it was just
a mistype ;)
--quay
jose,
today i tested my wiring :
over the 15m BNC cable (with both T and resistors connected) i have 9 ohm
resistance.
T-conns are ok.
resistors have 58 ohm.
are this values ok ?
--quay
.
If it works you have a configuration/software problem.
-JMS
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Quaylar
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001 3:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [newbie] repost : lan problems
heres a weird thing i noticed
hi all !
im reposting because i still have my win-linux lan problem.
let me describe:
i have 1 win2k box and 1 mandrake box.
win2k :
1) surecom ep325 configured to utilize BNC port
2) no resource conflicts
3) LAN connection is up with 192.168.0.1/24
4) firewall is down
mandrake box:
1)
:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] repost : lan problems
hi all !
im reposting because i still have my win-linux lan problem.
let me describe:
i have 1 win2k box and 1 mandrake box.
win2k :
1) surecom ep325 configured to utilize BNC port
2) no resource conflicts
3) LAN connection
At 17:45 03.03.2001 -0500, you wrote:
I hope that your ethernet addresses were a mistype...
You have both machines with the same address according to your message,
which of course will not work!
-JMS
hi jose,
yes u are right, it was a mistype. i would have noticed such a dumb failure
Well, I'm guessing that you need Samba running.
Regards
Daryl
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Quaylar
Sent: 03 March 2001 21:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] repost : lan problems
hi all !
im reposting because i
t can penetrate
the receptacle.
Since your LAN setup worked for awhile look for a physical problem of some
sort.
-JMS
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Quaylar
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 6:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ne
At 19:48 03.03.2001 -0500, you wrote:
Thinnet networks are subject to something akin to "standing waves".
The signal "bounces" off of one end of the cable and back. This results in
an "echo" which is 180 degrees out of phaze with the next incoming wave...
The two cancel out and you end up with
12 matches
Mail list logo
