Re: [newbie] slow after 9.0 install

2003-02-01 Thread Ronald J. Hall
On Friday 31 January 2003 04:41 pm, et wrote: I am glad we don't have the hardware specs any more too... so now I can chime in add more memory Er, didn't notice what anyone had posted about that - was it low? I just assumed (shame on me!) that with Ram so cheap now-a-days, that everybody

Re: [newbie] slow after 9.0 install

2003-01-31 Thread iggy
On Thursday 30 January 2003 01:59 pm, Anne Wilson wrote: On Thursday 30 Jan 2003 6:30 pm, et wrote: Snipped I would suggest you turn of DNS, caching name server, named, routed and yp services and other YP services (unless you need them and understand how to correctly configure

Re: [newbie] slow after 9.0 install

2003-01-31 Thread Ronald J. Hall
On Friday 31 January 2003 12:53 pm, iggy wrote: anyother ideas would be greatly appreciated. -iggy Make sure you don't have a hostname conflict somewhere. That wil definitely slow your system down. Also, you can get KDE to bootup faster by editing: /usr/bin/startkde and commenting out the

Re: [newbie] slow after 9.0 install

2003-01-31 Thread et
On Friday 31 January 2003 12:58 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote: On Friday 31 January 2003 12:53 pm, iggy wrote: anyother ideas would be greatly appreciated. -iggy Make sure you don't have a hostname conflict somewhere. That wil definitely slow your system down. Also, you can get KDE to bootup

Re: [newbie] slow after 9.0 install

2003-01-30 Thread robin
iggy wrote: dear all, ***symptoms*** i recently installed 9.0 and have noticed that it is painfully slow. i'm very surprised as 8.2 ran like a bat out of hell. ***pertinate info*** msi mobo(i don't remember the model offhand), amd 1700+ cpu, 256 mb ram (unknown manufacturer), wd 40gb hard

Re: [newbie] slow after 9.0 install

2003-01-30 Thread iggy
On Thursday 30 January 2003 07:53 am, robin wrote: iggy wrote: dear all, ***symptoms*** i recently installed 9.0 and have noticed that it is painfully slow. i'm very surprised as 8.2 ran like a bat out of hell. ***pertinate info*** msi mobo(i don't remember the model offhand), amd

RE: [newbie] slow after 9.0 install

2003-01-30 Thread Myers, Dennis R NWO
Title: RE: [newbie] slow after 9.0 install -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of iggy Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] slow after 9.0 install On Thursday 30 January 2003 07:53 am

Re: [newbie] slow after 9.0 install

2003-01-30 Thread et
On Thursday 30 January 2003 11:42 am, Myers, Dennis R NWO wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of iggy Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] slow after 9.0 install On Thursday 30

Re: [newbie] slow after 9.0 install

2003-01-30 Thread iggy
On Thursday 30 January 2003 11:42 am, Myers, Dennis R NWO wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of iggy Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] slow after 9.0 install On Thursday 30

Re: [newbie] slow after 9.0 install

2003-01-30 Thread iggy
: [newbie] slow after 9.0 install On Thursday 30 January 2003 07:53 am, robin wrote: iggy wrote: dear all, ***symptoms*** i recently installed 9.0 and have noticed that it is painfully slow. i'm very surprised as 8.2 ran like a bat out of hell. ***pertinate info

Re: [newbie] slow after 9.0 install

2003-01-30 Thread et
Snipped I would suggest you turn of DNS, caching name server, named, routed and yp services and other YP services (unless you need them and understand how to correctly configure them seems that named (a DNS) would be the only one i need of the ones you mentioned as i am attempting to

Re: [newbie] slow after 9.0 install

2003-01-30 Thread Anne Wilson
On Thursday 30 Jan 2003 6:30 pm, et wrote: Snipped I would suggest you turn of DNS, caching name server, named, routed and yp services and other YP services (unless you need them and understand how to correctly configure them seems that named (a DNS) would be the only one i need of