El vie, 09-01-2004 a las 09:39, Anne Wilson escribió:
Warren - this was a well-publicised problem with 8.2. The fix was
simple, though I can't remember it. It was described on the 8.2
Errata page, and I think it's still available.
Actually, it was a problem with 9.0:
On Friday 09 January 2004 03:06 pm, Aron Smith wrote:
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 07:51, Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Thursday 08 January 2004 10:12 pm, Aron Smith wrote:
Any way, next time I will use urpmi.update.
I like it better myself.
I just pulled a dummy ..I did an easy urpmi but
On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 10:09, Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Friday 09 January 2004 03:06 pm, Aron Smith wrote:
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 07:51, Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Thursday 08 January 2004 10:12 pm, Aron Smith wrote:
Any way, next time I will use urpmi.update.
I like it better myself.
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 01:21, Miark wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 18:59:48 -0400, Adolfo Bello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It happened to me for a week. Every time I tried urpmi any-package I
got the everything installed message.
Then I realized that I was missing the --update part of the
On Thursday 08 January 2004 22:38, Warren Post wrote:
Frequently when I try to update my system, rpmdrake (urpmi) tells
me that everything is already installed. For example, I have
bind-utils-9.2.0-6mdk currently installed. bind-utils-9.2.1-2.2mdk
is available on the update mirrors, but when I
On Thursday 08 January 2004 10:12 pm, Aron Smith wrote:
Any way, next time I will use urpmi.update.
I like it better myself.
I just pulled a dummy ..I did an easy urpmi but left it set
for 9.2 instead of the 9.1 I was using It updated 682 packages
so I might be running 9.2 now OTH I
On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 07:14:01 -0400, Adolfo Bello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am now understanding it much better. I have to wait for the next bunch
of updates to try what I have learned. Just before this thread started I
had upgraded my kernel and kernel sources.
Be warned that kernels are a
On Friday 09 January 2004 15:51, Miark wrote:
On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 07:14:01 -0400, Adolfo Bello
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am now understanding it much better. I have to wait for the
next bunch of updates to try what I have learned. Just before
this thread started I had upgraded my kernel
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 07:51, Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Thursday 08 January 2004 10:12 pm, Aron Smith wrote:
Any way, next time I will use urpmi.update.
I like it better myself.
I just pulled a dummy ..I did an easy urpmi but left it set
for 9.2 instead of the 9.1 I was using It
Frequently when I try to update my system, rpmdrake (urpmi) tells me
that everything is already installed. For example, I have
bind-utils-9.2.0-6mdk currently installed. bind-utils-9.2.1-2.2mdk is
available on the update mirrors, but when I try to update it I am told
everything already installed.
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 18:38, Warren Post wrote:
Frequently when I try to update my system, rpmdrake (urpmi) tells me
that everything is already installed. For example, I have
bind-utils-9.2.0-6mdk currently installed. bind-utils-9.2.1-2.2mdk is
available on the update mirrors, but when I try
On Thursday 08 Jan 2004 10:38 pm, Warren Post wrote:
Frequently when I try to update my system, rpmdrake (urpmi) tells me
that everything is already installed. For example, I have
bind-utils-9.2.0-6mdk currently installed. bind-utils-9.2.1-2.2mdk is
available on the update mirrors, but when I
On Thursday 08 January 2004 05:59 pm, Adolfo Bello wrote:
If I download the rpm from the mirror and install by hand, everything
works fine, so it's not like the packages on the mirror are damaged.
What should I be looking at to fix this problem? I'm using
urpmi-4.0-20_82.2mdk and
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 21:02, Greg Meyer wrote:
On Thursday 08 January 2004 05:59 pm, Adolfo Bello wrote:
If I download the rpm from the mirror and install by hand, everything
works fine, so it's not like the packages on the mirror are damaged.
What should I be looking at to fix this
On Thursday 08 January 2004 08:29 pm, Adolfo Bello wrote:
I never used urpmi.update. Does the graphical interfase do an
urpmi.update automatically?
yes.
Any way, next time I will use urpmi.update.
I like it better myself.
--
/g
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 19:17, Greg Meyer wrote:
On Thursday 08 January 2004 08:29 pm, Adolfo Bello wrote:
I never used urpmi.update. Does the graphical interfase do an
urpmi.update automatically?
yes.
Any way, next time I will use urpmi.update.
I like it better myself.
I just pulled a
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:02:03 -0500, Greg Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't forget that you have to run 'urpmi.update --update' first to update your
urpmi database with the new packages for the update source.
Unless this is something unique to 9.2, I think it's 'urpmi.update -a' to
update
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 18:59:48 -0400, Adolfo Bello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It happened to me for a week. Every time I tried urpmi any-package I
got the everything installed message.
Then I realized that I was missing the --update part of the command.
urpmi --update any-package
I've never
18 matches
Mail list logo
