Re: [newbie] what is wrong with dependencies

2001-09-20 Thread Michel Clasquin
On Wednesday 19 September 2001 15:41, Jim Dawson wrote: > > It's such a problem that > > evidently XP has given up on the shared DLLs and each app will now have > > them in their own folder. > > My guess is that Bill Gates owns quite a bit of stock in companies that > make hard drives. and RAM c

Re: [newbie] what is wrong with dependencies

2001-09-19 Thread Joseph Braddock
I agree 100%. I was simply trying to point out that auto-updating dependencies would create the problems that Window$ has. To solve a real problem (incompatible DLLs), Microsoft has opted to go the hardware route -- hard drives are cheap. Unfortunately, it still doesn't solve the problem, a

Re: [newbie] what is wrong with dependencies

2001-09-18 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001 18:21:10 -0500, Joseph Braddock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know dependencies are a pain, but so is Windows when some program being > install takes it upon itself to update various DLLs that a new app needs, but > breaks existing apps in the process. It's such a problem t

Re: [newbie] what is wrong with dependencies

2001-09-18 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan
th dependencies at all. > just some thoughts.. > > > rgds > > Frank > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrei Raevsky > Sent: Tuesday, 18 September 2001 3:24 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [newbie] what is wrong with dependencies

2001-09-18 Thread ddcharles
Hi, I have a related question; is there no "uninstall" (not talking about rpms)? A lot of the apps I have installed (./configure;make;make install) have a "make uninstall", but that means that you have to untar/gunzip the package again if/when you want to uninstall it; Has there ever been any

RE: [newbie] what is wrong with dependencies

2001-09-18 Thread Dave Sherman
On Tue, 2001-09-18 at 04:16, Franki wrote: > I think two other things would help,. a gui and console tool that does smart > tarball installs and updates the rpm database for that app, and one that can > get dependencies for you,, (goes to a mandrake update site list...etc etc. > or asks for the CD

RE: [newbie] what is wrong with dependencies

2001-09-18 Thread Franki
ED]]On Behalf Of Andrei Raevsky Sent: Tuesday, 18 September 2001 3:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [newbie] what is wrong with dependencies Frankly - I am rather frustrated with the issues of dependencies. Almost each time I try to install an rpm file, or compile a tar.gz, I get a failed/miss

[newbie] what is wrong with dependencies

2001-09-18 Thread Andrei Raevsky
Frankly - I am rather frustrated with the issues of dependencies. Almost each time I try to install an rpm file, or compile a tar.gz, I get a failed/missing dependencies error. I was told that this is "just as in Windows in which programs need dlls". This is simply not true. When a Win32 de