On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 10:23:28 +, Anne Wilson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 13 Nov 2004 03:37, David E. Fox wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:06:20 +
> >
> > Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > a sig on the lines of 'I am a gmail user and cannot turn off reply-to.
> > >
>
On Saturday 13 Nov 2004 03:37, David E. Fox wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:06:20 +
>
> Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > a sig on the lines of 'I am a gmail user and cannot turn off reply-to.
> >
> > Please be aware of this.'
>
> It wouldn't be easier just to change clients?
Possibly
On Friday 12 November 2004 10:37 pm, David E. Fox wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:06:20 +
> Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > a sig on the lines of 'I am a gmail user and cannot turn off reply-to.
> >
> > Please be aware of this.'
>
> It wouldn't be easier just to change clients?
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:06:20 +
Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a sig on the lines of 'I am a gmail user and cannot turn off reply-to.
>
> Please be aware of this.'
It wouldn't be easier just to change clients?
--
--
On November 10, 2004 05:06, Anne Wilson wrote:
...
> There has been a long thread about this on Expert. It is agreed that it is
> 'unfixable' for the moment, and it was suggested that gmail users should
> have a sig on the lines of 'I am a gmail user and cannot turn off reply-to.
> Please be aware
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 19:01:50 +0700
Merlin Zener disseminated the following:
> "this feature is not supported at this time" type generic response back...
...they're too busy plugging the security holes ;-)
--
JoeHill / RLU #282046 / www.freeyourmachine.org
09:32:40 up 98 days, 10:24, 7 users, l
On Wednesday 10 Nov 2004 12:01, Merlin Zener wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 09:48, Chris wrote:
> > On Monday 01 November 2004 08:41 pm, David Johnson wrote:
> > > You should be able to make your replyto: field blank. I was able to.
> > > Now, I can't vouch for whether or not it actually works, bu
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 19:01:50 +0700, Merlin Zener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > You should be able to make your replyto: field blank. I was able to.
> > > Now, I can't vouch for whether or not it actually works, but I was
> > > able to set it to "".
> >
> > Nope, it doesn't work David.
>
> I c
On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 09:48, Chris wrote:
> On Monday 01 November 2004 08:41 pm, David Johnson wrote:
>
> >
> > You should be able to make your replyto: field blank. I was able to.
> > Now, I can't vouch for whether or not it actually works, but I was
> > able to set it to "".
> >
>
> Nope, it d
On Monday 01 November 2004 08:41 pm, David Johnson wrote:
>
> You should be able to make your replyto: field blank. I was able to.
> Now, I can't vouch for whether or not it actually works, but I was
> able to set it to "".
>
Nope, it doesn't work David.
From: David Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-- Forwarded message --
From: David Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 18:40:45 -0800
Subject: Re: [newbie] A short notice to gmail users
To: Amy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You should be able to make your replyto: field blank. I was able to.
Now, I can't vouch for whether
11 matches
Mail list logo
