I agree more or less. I treat my Windows box as a reliable for lack of a
better word. Linux is the hot rod I tweak and play with. I am told,
repeatedly by hardcore Linux users, that their Linux box is their mainstain
over Windows. To each their own but so far as work goes I am still chained
to
This is not a gripe, just an observation, but it seems like for most people
(including me) their linux system is usually in a constant state of
broken-ness, or in some way always marginally handicapped. Why is that? I
realize that software is difficult to write just in general and operating
not...
-Original Message-
From: civileme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 11:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mark Johnson;
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Polite software (was RE: [newbie] Is this a joke?)
This is not a gripe, just an observation, but it seems like
11:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mark Johnson;
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Polite software (was RE: [newbie] Is this a joke?)
This is not a gripe, just an observation, but it seems like
for most people
(including me) their linux system is usually in a constant state of
broken
PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Polite software (was RE: [newbie] Is this a joke?)
This is not a gripe, just an observation, but it seems like
for most people
(including me) their linux system is usually in a constant state of
broken-ness, or in some way always marginally handicapped.
Why
This is not a gripe, just an observation, but it seems like for most people
(including me) their linux system is usually in a constant state of
broken-ness, or in some way always marginally handicapped. Why is that? I
realize that software is difficult to write just in general and operating
