Seth Gibson wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, you wrote:
When I think of a windows
install, I think of about 4 hours sitting in front of a computer
clicking buttons with a mouse, multiple rebooting session and crossing
my fingers that it will work this time. Installing Linux on the other
On Sun, 28 Nov 1999,Tom Jacobs wrote:
| My two cents:
|
| Being a brand new Linux user, I still wonder "hmmm why
| do I have to mount my CDROM just to use it. Why can't
| I just click on a picture or type d:\".
| While I am no lover of M$ products in any way. Out of
| the box,
Tom Jacobs wrote:
My two cents:
Being a brand new Linux user, I still wonder "hmmm why
do I have to mount my CDROM just to use it. Why can't
I just click on a picture or type d:\".
While I am no lover of M$ products in any way. Out of
the box, with no other knowledge of computers,
Tom Jacobs wrote:
My two cents:
Being a brand new Linux user, I still wonder "hmmm why
do I have to mount my CDROM just to use it. Why can't
I just click on a picture or type d:\".
While I am no lover of M$ products in any way. Out of
the box, with no other knowledge of computers,
On Sun, 28 Nov 1999, you wrote:
P.S. Is there an ls command that will allow the
directory contents to stop at the end of each page so
I can read them?
Yes: ls |less (that's the "pipe" symbol, in case you don't
recognize it.)
As for your "x-server" problems, what video card do you
have and
On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, you wrote:
When I think of a windows
install, I think of about 4 hours sitting in front of a computer
clicking buttons with a mouse, multiple rebooting session and crossing
my fingers that it will work this time. Installing Linux on the other
And could you imagine how
ls | less
why use less? Because LESS is MORE!
actully, less lets you move up and down, and i feel is better then more
- Original Message -
From: Gregg Carrier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 1999 2:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Re: [newbie] MSIE when?]
Tom
On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, PadLocke wrote:
Took a look at Mozilla. Liked it. Haven't heard of Konqueror though. Is it any
smaller than Mozilla? Can you point me to a page where I get get it?
thanks :)
It's KDE's browser which should ship with KDE 2.0 (it's not out yet). From
what I hear it's
On fre, 26 nov 1999, you wrote:
"Thomas J. Hamman" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, Ernest N. Wilcox Jr. wrote:
stable manner. But you have to admitt that they have done a great job with
the
installer. Any user can install M$'s OS. Now if they'd just stop trying
to
My two cents:
Being a brand new Linux user, I still wonder "hmmm why
do I have to mount my CDROM just to use it. Why can't
I just click on a picture or type d:\".
While I am no lover of M$ products in any way. Out of
the box, with no other knowledge of computers,
Winbloze wins hands down in
On Sun, 28 Nov 1999, Tom Jacobs wrote:
My two cents:
Being a brand new Linux user, I still wonder "hmmm why
do I have to mount my CDROM just to use it. Why can't
I just click on a picture or type d:\".
I'm not sure if there's any other technical reason why, but I assume it's
because of
Tom:
Thank you for the explainations of some of the Linux file features.
And Yes I was using Win98 as my main comparison to Linux. They have, like
LINUX, fixed the Bootable aspect of the CD-Rom, and unless you have really
cheap components, it will install and setup most of your hardware.
Steve
Hi Thomas,
"Thomas J. Hamman" wrote:
Installing a program from an rpm file is pretty simple; just type:
rpm -ivh filename
(i=install, v=verbose, h=hash. i is the only option you really need to
install, but the v and h add nice features that let you know how the
install is going.)
On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, Ernest N. Wilcox Jr. wrote:
stable manner. But you have to admitt that they have done a great job with the
installer. Any user can install M$'s OS. Now if they'd just stop trying to
Actually I think I WON'T "admit" that. :) If you want to completely
reinstall Windows 95
"Thomas J. Hamman" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, Ernest N. Wilcox Jr. wrote:
stable manner. But you have to admitt that they have done a great job with
the
installer. Any user can install M$'s OS. Now if they'd just stop trying
to
Gee I hate to knock you off your soap box,
Dear friends:
Just curious: I understand that IE is available for Solaris. That's for
Sun, Microsoft's arch enemy. How did that happen?
Benjamin
--
Benjamin and Anna Sher
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sher's Russian Web
http://www.websher.net
ne of them! And if
Konquerer or any other browser is to have any hope, they better have 128-bit
encryption before I use it.
=taking flame suit off=
-- Doug Craig
- Original Message -
From: "Chip Wiegand" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 1999 7:52 PM
Took a look at Mozilla. Liked it. Haven't heard of Konqueror though. Is it any
smaller than Mozilla? Can you point me to a page where I get get it?
thanks :)
On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, you wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, Donny wrote:
Hay, wasnt MSIE supossed to be out in november for linux?
On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, you wrote:
(which its now doing) itll give MS a better run for its money.
hehe funny we mention money in the presence of linux!
--
Seth Gibson
www.mp3.com/PSM0x2710
members.tripod.com/cybernetic_thunder (Under Construction)
The Functional Design of the UNIX Operating
PadLockeKonqueror will be part of KDE 2.0 when it is released.
Alan
PadLocke wrote:
Took a look at Mozilla. Liked it. Haven't heard of Konqueror though. Is it any
smaller than Mozilla? Can you point me to a page where I get get it?
thanks :)
On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, you wrote:
On
Donny wrote:
Hay, wasnt MSIE supossed to be out in november for linux?
Thats wat i heard.
Thanxs for the laugh...
I doubt M$ will ever port anything they have to Linux.
On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, Donny wrote:
Hay, wasnt MSIE supossed to be out in november for linux?
Thats wat i heard.
Probably won't be out until MainSoft's MainWin IDE for Linux is released,
if ever. Last I heard, MainWin was scheduled for next year. Pesonally, I'm
hoping for Mozilla or
On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, you wrote:
Hay, wasnt MSIE supossed to be out in november for linux?
Thats wat i heard.
I don't know about ya'll, but my reason for moving to Linux was to get away
from micro$oft, not use that stuff in Linux. Isn't that defeating the purpose
of using an alternative OS?
Chip Wiegand wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, you wrote:
Hay, wasnt MSIE supossed to be out in november for linux?
Thats wat i heard.
I don't know about ya'll, but my reason for moving to Linux was to get away
from micro$oft, not use that stuff in Linux. Isn't that defeating the purpose
of
There will never be an MS IE for Linux. Find out what whoever is
telling you that is smoking. I want some.
Ken Wilson
First Law of Optimisation: The speed of a non-working program is
irrelevant
(Steve Heller, 'Efficient C/C++ Programming')
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ken Wilson wrote:
There will never be an MS IE for Linux. Find out what whoever is
telling you that is smoking. I want some.
Ken Wilson
First Law of Optimisation: The speed of a non-working program is
irrelevant
(Steve Heller, 'Efficient C/C++ Programming')
-Original Message-
26 matches
Mail list logo
