Re: Re[7]: [newbie] Backdoor for crashes?

2003-06-15 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Saturday June 14 2003 02:03 pm, rikona wrote: Hello Tom, Thursday, June 12, 2003, 10:54:10 AM, you wrote: That's exactly what I did, but it didn't kill it. I'd run top, get the PID, exit top, kill it, go back to top, and it's still there. Any idea why? TBUsually I start with a

Re[7]: [newbie] Backdoor for crashes?

2003-06-14 Thread rikona
Hello Stephen, Wednesday, June 11, 2003, 4:19:25 PM, you wrote: SK On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 04:41, rikona wrote: That's exactly what I did, but it didn't kill it. I'd run top, get the PID, exit top, kill it, go back to top, and it's still there. Any idea why? SK It's probably easier to run

Re[7]: [newbie] Backdoor for crashes?

2003-06-14 Thread rikona
Hello Tom, Thursday, June 12, 2003, 10:54:10 AM, you wrote: That's exactly what I did, but it didn't kill it. I'd run top, get the PID, exit top, kill it, go back to top, and it's still there. Any idea why? TBUsually I start with a 'killall app-name' If that doesn't get TB it done I

Re: Re[7]: [newbie] Backdoor for crashes?

2003-06-12 Thread stormjumper
- Original Message - From: rikona [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: stormjumper [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 07:08 Subject: Re[7]: [newbie] Backdoor for crashes? Hello stormjumper, Wednesday, June 11, 2003, 1:42:02 PM, you wrote: s kill actually passes certain signals

Re[7]: [newbie] Backdoor for crashes?

2003-06-11 Thread FemmeFatale
At 04:08 PM 6/11/2003 -0700, you wrote: Hmmm... didn't know there was more than one. :-) Us newbies have a lot to learn, I guess. I am slowly beginning to undersatnd the man pages better. The terseness and jargon, for me, is not newbie oriented, and sometimes quite difficult to fully understand.