Hi,
- Original Message -
> From: "William Allen Simpson"
> To: "Matt Benjamin"
> Cc: d...@redhat.com, nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 2:21:41 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] UDP duplicate cache in both Gane
On 3/9/17 1:44 PM, Matt Benjamin wrote:
> But, isn't su_cache...NULL?
>
Aha, I see that you are correct. It is only set non-NULL in
svc_dg_enablecache(), and that's never called. Anywhere.
So we have this useless facility that I (and Malahal) have been
trying to keep up-to-date with changes, an
But, isn't su_cache...NULL?
Matt
- Original Message -
> From: "William Allen Simpson"
> To: d...@redhat.com, nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2017 1:19:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] UDP duplicate cache in both Ganes
On 3/9/17 10:12 AM, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
> It probably should stay. ntirpc is intended to be useful to more than
> Ganesha, and this seems like a useful feature for potential users. It's
> not the codepaths called by Ganesha, so it doesn't cause any problems.
>
It *is* the codepaths called by
It probably should stay. ntirpc is intended to be useful to more than
Ganesha, and this seems like a useful feature for potential users. It's
not the codepaths called by Ganesha, so it doesn't cause any problems.
Daniel
On 03/09/2017 09:21 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> Anybody have any o
Hi Bill,
As I explained in detail, this code path is used in svc_run, but nfs-ganesha
doesn't use it.
Matt
- Original Message -
> From: "William Allen Simpson"
> To: "NFS Ganesha Developers"
> Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2017 9:21:38 AM
> Subject: [N
Anybody have any objections to my removing the ntirpc version?
Clearly, this is done in RPCAL/nfs_duprec.c, so why is it also in
libntirpc/src/svc_dg.c?
According to blame, Matt, Malahal, and Frank have all worked on this,
but not since early 2015.
---
