For that price you could go lithium
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
-Original Message-
From: "Pastor Ron"
Sender: nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 09:42:54
To:
Reply-To: nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 85 Nighth
*
>> --
>>
>> *From:* nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com [mailto:
>> nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Javier Garcia
>> *Sent:* Friday, May 18, 2012 9:00 AM
>>
>> *To:* nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com
>> *Subj
t:* Friday, May 18, 2012 9:00 AM
>
> *To:* nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 85 Nighthawk 650
>
>
> ** **
>
> I have said it before and I will say it again, get a sealed Yuasa battery.
> Javier.
>
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at
From: nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Javier Garcia
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 9:00 AM
To: nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 85 Nighthawk 650
I have said it before and I will say it again, get a sealed Yuasa ba
m] *On Behalf Of *paul annen
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 17, 2012 11:04 PM
> *To:* nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 85 Nighthawk 650
>
> ** **
>
> @ kurt and ron
>
> as an employee of batteries plus i can strongly recommend the X2 s
: nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of paul annen
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 11:04 PM
To: nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 85 Nighthawk 650
@ kurt and ron
as an employee of batteries plus i can strongly recommend the X2
@ kurt and ron
as an employee of batteries plus i can strongly recommend the X2 series of
agm batteries. I have one in my goldwing and LOVE it... the next step down
in quality is only about $10 difference, so why not go with the MUCH better
choice?
yeti
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:24 PM, surfswab
I'm passing on a recommendation from one of our members (Thanks,
Kurt).
It's the X2 from Batteries Plus. AGM (Absorbent Glass Mat), 220 CCA,
maintenance-free. About $90, but worth every penny.
I've lost the link, but it's readily available on Google. Search
their site for fitment to your bike,
20 PM
>
> *To:* 'nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com'
> *Subject:* RE: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 85 Nighthawk 650
>
>
>
> Thanks for the info. I will do this tonight and let you know how it goes.
> Thanks again
>
> for the helpful advice….
>
>
>
> Bassam
&
Bassam
From: Bassam Khalil [mailto:bassam.kha...@rcig.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 3:20 PM
To: 'nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com'
Subject: RE: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 85 Nighthawk 650
Thanks for the info. I will do this tonight and let you know how it goes.
Thanks again
fo
@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 85 Nighthawk 650
A good hardware store should have an assortment of rubber plugs. They're
conical in shape so pick one where the small end is just smaller than the
opening and the large end is larger. I also drove a screw into the center of
:29 PM
>
> *To:* nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 85 Nighthawk 650
>
>
>
> This was a can of liquid, no aerosol. I didn't run it through the engine
> though. I used it to clean the tank while it was off and dried it before
> fil
Cork or rubber plugs would work well
-Original Message-
Date: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 1:32:53 pm
To:
From: "Bassam Khalil"
Subject: RE: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 85 Nighthawk 650
I just purchased Evapo-rust and wanted to know what I would use to plug the
bung and filler
h
, June 28, 2010 12:29 PM
To: nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 85 Nighthawk 650
This was a can of liquid, no aerosol. I didn't run it through the engine
though. I used it to clean the tank while it was off and dried it before
filling it back up with gas. Di
-
> *From:* Kyle Munz
> *To:* nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com
> *Sent:* Mon, June 28, 2010 12:29:13 PM
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 85 Nighthawk 650
>
> This was a can of liquid, no aerosol. I didn't run it through the engine
> though. I used it to cle
/alters the signal coming from the sensor(s).
Stanley
From: Kyle Munz
To: nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com
Sent: Mon, June 28, 2010 12:29:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 85 Nighthawk 650
This was a can of liquid, no aerosol. I didn't run it thro
; the carb. It works for injectors as well.
> > It lost most of the hesitation under hard acceleration after a few runs
> with
> > the acetone.
> >
> > Stanley
> >
> > ____
> > From: Kyle Munz
> > To: nighthawk_lovers@
of the hesitation under hard acceleration after a few runs with
> the acetone.
>
> Stanley
>
>
> From: Kyle Munz
> To: nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Mon, June 28, 2010 9:59:00 AM
> Subject: Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 85 Nigh
: nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com
Sent: Mon, June 28, 2010 9:59:00 AM
Subject: Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 85 Nighthawk 650
I just got a can of some sort of fuel system cleaner at the auto parts store. I
think it was called B12 or B31 or something. I remember the 'B'. It wasn't the
usual add
@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 85 Nighthawk 650
I just got a can of some sort of fuel system cleaner at the auto parts
store. I think it was called B12 or B31 or something. I remember the 'B'. It
wasn't the usual add-with-gas stuff though, I just asked the guy beh
@rcig.net]
> *Sent:* Saturday, June 26, 2010 6:37 PM
>
> *To:* 'nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com'
> *Subject:* RE: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 85 Nighthawk 650
>
>
>
> Thanks for the info. I do still think that the filter is still in the tank.
> This process has
rday, June 26, 2010 1:14 PM
To: nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com
Cc: Bassam Khalil
Subject: Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 85 Nighthawk 650
1. It's easy enough to remove the sending unit. After a while they become
inaccurate. While you have the tank off it might be a good time to plug it
in,
Regarding your number 3 item above:
There definitely should be plastic/nylon filter "sleeve" that fits
down over that tube and rests in an indentation down in the throat of
the petcock. It is held in place with an o-ring which is slipped over
the sleeve, then worked down to its base. I "packed"
: nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com
Cc: Bassam Khalil
Subject: Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 85 Nighthawk 650
1. It's easy enough to remove the sending unit. After a while they become
inaccurate. While you have the tank off it might be a good time to plug it
in, and see if the fuel gauge corres
27;t have a filter just A Long
> white plastic tube. Is there anything else I need to remove? is the
> filter still in the tank?
>
> Thanks
>
> Bassam
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bassam Khalil [mailto:bassam.kha...@rcig.net]
> Sent: Friday, June 18
riday, June 18, 2010 11:39 AM
To: 'nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com'
Subject: RE: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 85 Nighthawk 650
Thanks again for the helpful advise...
B-man
-Original Message-
From: nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nighthawk_lov...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Thanks.
From: nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nighthawk_lov...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of bobcat...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 8:36 PM
To: nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 85 Nighthawk 650
If you only have a little rust, I would
M
> To: nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 85 Nighthawk 650
>
> I used POR15 on mine. There are others that people have used but I
> can't remember the names. A search of the archives would probably pull
> it up. Some swear by them, others think
hawk_lov...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Kyle Munz
> Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 11:07 AM
> To: nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 85 Nighthawk 650
>
> On 6/18/10, Kyle Munz wrote:
>> I would take it off since it's relatively easy to
.@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Kyle Munz
> Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 11:07 AM
> To: nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 85 Nighthawk 650
>
> On 6/18/10, Kyle Munz wrote:
>> I would take it off since it's relatively easy to do. Cle
Subject: Re: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 85 Nighthawk 650
On 6/18/10, Kyle Munz wrote:
> I would take it off since it's relatively easy to do. Cleaning it
> isn't hard. The trick is drying it out thoroughly so any left over gas
> doesn't ignite.. I used a hair dryer for this, warm
..@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of surfswab
>> Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 4:25 PM
>> To: Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!
>> Subject: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 85 Nighthawk 650
>>
>> Here's a tip that may save you some grief later:
>>
>> There's an o-ring and
o what should I clean
> it with.
>
> Thanks
>
> B-Man
>
> -Original Message-
> From: nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:nighthawk_lov...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of surfswab
> Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 4:25 PM
> To: Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!
>
:25 PM
To: Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!
Subject: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 85 Nighthawk 650
Here's a tip that may save you some grief later:
There's an o-ring and a nylon filter "sleeve" that fits down over the
brass tube and seats down in the body of the petcock. It's a pres
Thanks for the helpful tips.
-Original Message-
From: nighthawk_lovers@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nighthawk_lov...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of surfswab
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 4:25 PM
To: Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!
Subject: [Nighthawk Lovers] Re: 85 Nighthawk 650
Here's
No need for anything like teflon tape or putty around the threads, if
that's what you're asking.
I wouldn't get too frisky tightening the large nut, either. Just get
it tight enuf and not too tight.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Nighthawk Motorcy
Here's a tip that may save you some grief later:
There's an o-ring and a nylon filter "sleeve" that fits down over the
brass tube and seats down in the body of the petcock. It's a press
fit kind of an assembly and is held in place by the same large nut
that holds the petcock to the tank.
Make su
37 matches
Mail list logo
