ntext-`tty|sed -e "s,.dev.,," -e "s,/,.,"`
I see that nmh commands are reading the $MHCONTEXT file, parsing the line
"Version: nmh-1.7.1" and printing the Welcome message, but not updating
the file unless there is a context change:
[bergman@rocoto ~]$
$WORK migrated my email to Office365 this week.
I now appreciate [n]mh more than I ever have since I began using it in 1987.
I want to thank each of you who is helping to keep nmh alive and functioning
-- I owe you all an adult beverage.
Mark
--
nmh-workers
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/lis
nted page. However, in the electronic copy I'll always take function
over form. Plain double- or single-quotes instead of left-quote and
right-quote, please.
Mark "don't get me started on things that look like space separators but paste
as printable Unicode characters" Bergman
re wouldn't be a stand-alone program 'mmdfunburst'?
Mark
PS.
I do like the idea of a command named "*funburst".
=>
=> --
=> Cheers, Ralph.
=> https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy
=>
=> _______
=> Nmh
ps://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=contents&keywords=mh&mode=path&suite=stable&arch=any
=>
=> --
=> Cheers, Ralph.
=> https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy
=>
=>
--
Mark BergmanBiker, Rock Climber, SCUBA Diver, Unix mechanic, IATSE #1
Stagehand
&
elyso rarely that I could easily stop if the header prefix
changed.
Mark
=>
=> David
=>
=> ___
=> Nmh-workers mailing list
=> Nmh-workers@nongnu.org
=> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
=>
--
Mark
In the message dated: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 12:01:22 +0100,
The pithy ruminations from Ralph Corderoy on
were:
=> Hi Ken,
=>
=> > I kind of think that the days of nmh being installed on centrally
=> > managed systems is slowly coming to an end.
Installed prior to user requests, installed because the
d
=>
=> ___
=> Nmh-workers mailing list
=> Nmh-workers@nongnu.org
=> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
=>
--
Mark BergmanBiker, Rock Climber, SCUBA Diver, Unix mechanic, IATSE #1
Stagehand
'94 Yamaha GTS1000A^
mechanism to decide on the From header based on
=> the message headers, and that the mh-profile language is powerful enough
=> to make use of it.
=>
=> --Ken
=>
=> ___
=> Nmh-workers mailing list
=> Nmh-workers@nongnu.org
=>
ld="%(void(getenv SIGNATURE))%(putstr)"
==
I've attached the wrapper.
To see the documentation:
pod repl.wrapper
-or-
repl.wrapper --wrap--D
To generate the skeleton of a config file:
repl.wrapper --wrap--C
Comments welcome.
Ma
Randal L. Schwartz
Mark
=> --Ken
=>
=> ___
=> Nmh-workers mailing list
=> Nmh-workers@nongnu.org
=> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
=>
--
Mark BergmanBiker, Rock Climber, Unix mechanic, IATSE #1 Stagehan
those lines seem to be parsed...(perhaps they were silently parsed
before) and they generate warnings, for example:
flists: multiple "# forw" profile components in
/home/bergman/.mh_profile, ignoring "-mime -annotate -format", continuing...
The man page for mh_profile doe
In the message dated: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 19:32:47 -0700,
The pithy ruminations from Lyndon Nerenberg on
were:
=>
=> On Jul 7, 2014, at 7:27 PM, heym...@bellsouth.net wrote:
=>
=> > nmh delivers locally, and then postfix connects to AT&T.
=>
=> Here's a survey:
=>
=> 1) How many people customi
thing.
Hmmm...I wonder how to describe the case when the output is not
concatenated...what about:
--DistinctOutputGrouping
which could just be abbreviated:
-dog
Mark
=> Cheers, Ralph.
=>
--
Mark BergmanBiker, Rock Climber, Unix mechanic, IATSE #1 Stagehand
'94
___
=> Nmh-workers mailing list
=> Nmh-workers@nongnu.org
=> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
=>
--
Mark BergmanBiker, Rock Climber, Unix mechanic, IATSE #1 Stagehand
'94 Yamaha GTS1000A^2
berg...@panix.com
http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks
In a message posted a long, long ago: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:10:45 -0500,
I wrote:
<[Nmh-workers] refile handling of corrupt .mh_sequences> were:
=>
=> I frequently have corrupt .mh_sequences files, most likely due
=> to interaction between procmail (using rcvstore) and claws-mail
=> (which update
replproc -invite: /usr/local/bin/replyfilter $*
-
Mark
=>
=> --Ken
=>
=> _______
=> Nmh-workers mailing list
=> Nmh-workers@nongnu.org
=> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
=>
--
Mark BergmanBik
unction
=> that reads email messages (m_getfld()) is used to read sequence files.
Yep. And lots of other stuff within nmh.
Thanks for the explanation.
Mark
[SNIP!]
=>
=> --Ken
=>
=> ___
=> Nmh-workers mailing list
=> Nmh-workers@nongnu.org
=>
I frequently have corrupt .mh_sequences files, most likely due
to interaction between procmail (using rcvstore) and claws-mail
(which updates .mh_sequences, but seems to ignore rcvstore locks,
unsurprisingly).
Regardless of the cause, I often end up with a .mh_sequences file that
has a line break
know if par (or a different formatting
program) can be told:
Do not format the block of text consisting of:
blank line
line consisting of only -
sequence of non-blank lines
zero-or-more blank lines
end of file
Tha
In the message dated: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:05:58 -0500,
The pithy ruminations from David Levine on
were:
=> Paul wrote:
=>
=> > david wrote:
[SNIP!]
=>
=> Mark wrote:
=>
=> > However... I see that altering it in-place is probably
=> > easier, and the result is available "everywhere" without
Paul Fox wrote:
=> david wrote:
=> > Ken wrote:
=> >
=> > > Although, if you're grep'ing for something, you'd think you'd
=> > > still find it in text/html (if it wasn't base64-encoded).
=> >
=> > Might as well go to text/plain along with decoding.
=> > Even Q-P is bothersome, esp. for
In the message dated: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:13:45 EST,
The pithy ruminations from Michael Richardson on
were:
=>
[SNIP!]
=>
=> To those who are thinking about colours, please remember to set both
=> foreground and background colors. YOU have no idea what my background
=> colour is. I
In the message dated: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 13:23:26 EDT,
The pithy ruminations from Ken Hornstein on
were:
=> >Once again I've been bitten by a lone `sortm' defaulting to `all' when I
=> >intended to do `sortm lp'. On a folder of some 20,000 emails that quite
=> >perturbs incremental backups! `rmm'
In the message dated: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:59:17 EST,
The pithy ruminations from Ken Hornstein on
<[Nmh-workers] masquerade settings & spost> were:
=> Greetings all,
=>
=> I've been (slowly) working on sorting out the whole From: mess that
=> was discussed earlier, and of course like many things i
In the message dated: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:48:55 +0100,
The pithy ruminations from Aleksander Matuszak on
were:
=> Ralph Corderoy writes:
=>
=> > Hi,
=> >
=> > I still use mail(1) for sending one-line emails or in pipes.
Yes, me too.
=>
=> More imporant (for me) is the possibility to send o
In the message dated: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:28:22 GMT,
The pithy ruminations from Andreas Wittkemper on
were:
=> On 01/10/12 16:56, berg...@merctech.com wrote:
=>
=>
=> > It seems as if you're talking about composing a reply based on the
=> > identity of the received message.
=> >
=> > I've been
In the message dated: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:19:34 EST,
The pithy ruminations from Ken Hornstein on
were:
=> >Yes, that works, but as I noted, when in a replcomps, further
=> >attempts to access {to} and other components return empty
=> >values.
=>
=> Ow. Damn your eyes, Earl ... I now have a head
In the message dated: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 20:56:07 CST,
The pithy ruminations from Earl Hood on
were:
=> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
=>
=> > And my interpretation of me is:
=> >
=> > 1) No From:, no message gets sent.
=>
=> Yep. Not sure if there is a
=> consensus on i
lopment, hoping that pointing to existing
code is helpful' Bergman
-
Mark BergmanBiker, Rock Climber, Unix mechanic, IATSE #1 Stagehand
'94 Yamaha GTS1000A^2
berg...@panix.com
http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=bergman%40panix.com
I want a newsgroup with
In the message dated: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:53:46 EST,
The pithy ruminations from Ken Hornstein on
were
:
=> Have we not beaten this subject into the ground yet?
=>
=> >Here's where we differ. For me, it's "easier" to configure sendmail, so that
=> >the nmh configuration remains the same in any
In the message dated: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:01:26 EST,
The pithy ruminations from valdis.kletni...@vt.edu on
were:
=>
=> On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:21:10 +0100, markus schnalke said:
=> > TLS seems to be already solved. However, why does nmh need TLS?
=> > Doesn't it delegate mail transfer to an MT
In the message dated: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:37:15 EST,
The pithy ruminations from Ken Hornstein on
were:
=> >Why? nmh doesn't need any new features, and the code is stable and
=> >portable.
=> >
=> >The best indicator that a chunk of code is mature is when it hasn't been
=> >touched for five ye
:15:40 AM EDT, Key ID
bf226fcc4ebfc273
% ldd `rpm -ql nmh|egrep "bin|lib"`|grep curse
Nope. None of the nmh binaries here are linked against ncurses.
Maybe the ncurses libraries are statically linked into nmh at compile
timebut I doubt it.
Mark "providing anectdotal
In the message dated: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:10:05 EDT,
The pithy ruminations from valdis.kletni...@vt.edu on
were:
=> --==_Exmh_1250611805_74514P
=> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
=>
=> On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:33:51 EDT, berg...@merctech.com said:
=>
=> > Is there a way to use rcvsto
In the message dated: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:45:50 CDT,
The pithy ruminations from ra...@hep.wisc.edu on
were:
=>
=> I think you have a weird rcvstore?! Mine doesn't change the
=> default folder.
H..
/usr/libexec/nmh/rcvstore
rcvstore -- nmh-1.3 [compiled on x86-4 at T
I use procmail to automatically file incoming mail into different folders,
using rcvstore. This works very well, but rcvstore changes the default folder.
This can cause problems, as the following scenario illustrates:
[STEP1] % scan +unimportant_folder
[STEP2] %
In the message dated: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:10:19 EST,
The pithy ruminations from "Mike O'Dell" on
were:
=> it should also be possible to have FCC stripped of BCC if desired
=>
=> heaven knows everything else is configurable
=>
Yep, but let's be more specific...while I'm strongly in favor of k
ary limit. I'd be more interested in raising
=> it if there were actually problems because of messages with header
=> components with names longer than 128. (The 'From ' lines don't
=> count because they're not valid syntax.)
Again, the mh-mail manpage states that nmh will read messages that contain
those lines, even if they aren't used by nmh, so they are not defacto invalid
syntax to nmh.
=>
=> (If you do raise it then my reading of RFC2822 says 998 would
=> be more defensible than 512.)
Perhaps the mh-mail man page needs to be updated. My mh-mail manpage, from the
1.3 source, cites a limit of 63 characters, as per RFC822.
In any case, raising the limit does seem to be the answer...
Mark "feeling pedantic this morning" Bergman
=>
=> -- PMM
=>
___
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
ally, I think that the philosophical argument about whether tools strip
out the "From " line or not is really separate from the fact that the the scan
listing breaks because of an arbitrarily small value in NAMESZ. The first
issue is difficult to resolve (as evidenced by the 3 year-ol
Messages with very long envelope "From" lines break scan(1). This behavior
happens with nmh 1.3 and 1.2.
These messages are typically from mailing lists (Yahoo groups, in particular).
The "Subject" field in the scan listing is displayed as just an asterisk (*).
When I run scan, I get errors lik
{
! printf STDERR "That's odd...messages \"$f/$m\"
and \"$folder/$msg\" have the same Message-Id but different checksums\n";
! }
}
} else {
$msgs{$msgid} = "+
hing really wild'n'crazy like:
IFS="," echo "1,2,3" | scan -
Oh, and just in case it hasn't been said enough recently...
"Thank you" to everyone who's continuing to maintain and
develop nmh.
Mark "haven't really
In the message dated: Wed, 21 May 2008 15:27:03 EDT,
The pithy ruminations from Paul Fox on
were:
=> tethys wrote:
=> >
=> >
=> > Peter Maydell writes:
=> >
=> > >Just use rsync to copy the laptop's idea of the situation
=> > >onto the desktop again? (And vice-versa in the morn
ts of individual messages
the client & server don't both receive the same messsages (ie.,
there's no external mail alias or forwarding system that would
send one message to both machines...if this is happening, there
would be messages with the sam
In the message dated: Tue, 06 May 2008 10:00:45 EDT,
The pithy ruminations from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
were:
=> On Tue, 06 May 2008 09:48:18 EDT, David Levine said:
=> > Anders writes:
=> >
=> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
=> > > > I thought that draft_from couldn't be enabled in a .mh_profile so
egards,
=>
=> Xavier Maillard
=>
=>
=> _______
=> Nmh-workers mailing list
=> Nmh-workers@nongnu.org
=> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
=>
-
Mark BergmanBiker, Rock Climber, Unix mechanic, IATSE #1 Stagehand
In the message dated: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 10:54:00 PST,
The pithy ruminations from Bill Wohler on
<[Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal> were:
=> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
=>
=> > Here's a minor change that I'd like to propose to nmh:
=> >
=> >The "Fcc" copy of a Bcc message should
ess the list of recipients (in fact, it
makes the Fcc copy almost useless).
Mark
-
Mark BergmanBiker, Rock Climber, Unix mechanic, IATSE #1 Stagehand
http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=bergman%40merctech.com
I want a newsgroup with a infinite S/N ratio! Now taking
for instance),
=> based upon patterns in the To:, CC: and maybe even In-Reply-To:.
=> It uses to work, then it broke. Now I use the "Identity" bar in MH-E,
=> but that's not MH --- that's emacs doing it for me.
I'm doing something like that, by calling an external
I hesitate to call myself an "expert", but here goes.
In the message dated: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 12:25:13 EDT,
The pithy ruminations from Michael Richardson on
<[Nmh-workers] forms expert> were:
=> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
=>
=>
=> Is there anyone with a deep understanding of the forms
Has anyone had luck integrating [ex|n]mh and Privacy Enhanced Mail (aka SMIME,
"*.p7m" files, x-pkcs7-mime)? I'm corresponding with several people who are
having difficulting integrating PGP or GPG with Outlook 2003, and they'd prefer
to use PEM. When I get mail that's been signed this way, it'
52 matches
Mail list logo
