e.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mats Karlsson
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 22:53 PM
To: 'Nick Holford'; 'Wang, Yaning'
Cc: 'Mark Sale - Next Level Solutions'; nmusers@globomaxnm.com
Subject: RE: [NMus
ons; nmusers@globomaxnm.com
Subject: Re: [NMusers] unbalanced design
Hi,
Its not clear to me what Mark had in mind when he asked if " mixed
effect modeling (NONMEM in particular) is robust".
But Susan proposes its just obviously OK and Yaning suggests
reading a book for the simple ca
Sale - Next
Level Solutions
*Sent:* Tuesday, September 02, 2008 1:28 PM
*To:* nmusers@globomaxnm.com
*Subject:* [NMusers] unbalanced design
Does anyone have a reference to a publication assessing whetheor
unbalances studies? I see if in a number of courses (including the
original
EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Mark Sale - Next Level Solutions
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 1:28 PM
To: nmusers@globomaxnm.com
Subject: [NMusers] unbalanced design
Does anyone have a reference to a publication assessing whether
mixed effect modeling (NONMEM in particular) is robust fo
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Mark Sale - Next Level Solutions
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 1:28 PM
To: nmusers@globomaxnm.com
Subject: [NMusers] unbalanced design
Does anyone have a reference to a publication assessing whether mixed
effect modeling (NONMEM in
Does anyone have a reference to a publication assessing whether mixed effect modeling (NONMEM in particular) is robust for unbalances studies? I see if in a number of courses (including the original beginners course for NONMEM), but can't find a publication.thanksMark Sale MDNext Level Solutions,
