Aren't we just speeding on the work of the V8 team? NodeJS just
leverages a low level API to that beast (and that's why there are
callbacks, they are low level function blocks in javascript.
So it's not about performance and Callbacks..
Where exactly are the usability leaks?
TJ thank you for your
What's the harm in adding this alias to node?
I remember myself running into this (as not everyone knows posix calls
by heart) and posting on this list.
Am 27.12.2012 22:51, schrieb Isaac Schlueter:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Jonathan Chayce Dickinson
wrote:
fs.prototype.readDir = func
Hi Guys,
I have a small hobby project to create a nice album for my films I have
stored on my computer (and servers). Besides loading information from
the internet (such as from IMDb) into a nice HTML UI, I'd like to be
able stream the films.
My question is now, is it even possible yet? Witho
Server not found
Am 13.08.2012 09:11, schrieb greelgorke:
to the topic: take a look at derbyjs.org :)
Am Samstag, 11. August 2012 18:21:20 UTC+2 schrieb shoshy:
Nils,
Thanks a lot for your quick reply.
I'll test it, i did see the entry_validation, but didn't know if
backbone l
I haven't even seen the last nodeconf videos, because I forgot about
them after a similar thread like this.
Maybe anyone collected links?
Am 04.07.2012 17:01, schrieb dhruvbird:
:-( I was hoping to catch the node-mysql live coding - heard that it
was a super-session! I hope they don't edit too
Haven't seen any discussions on domains lately, they are in .7.12, so
they are going to be in 0.8?
Anyone using them yet?
Am 20.06.2012 01:31, schrieb Isaac Schlueter:
2012.06.19, Version 0.7.12 (unstable)
This is the last release on the 0.7 branch. Version 0.8.0 will be
released some time
Could this be made default behavior for requiring folders without index.js?
Am 04.05.2012 04:19, schrieb Stephen Handley:
New package to allow writing minimal node index.js/index.coffee files
that require and export siblings by file basename. Would appreciate
any feedback... I assumed there was
JavaScript is objectoriented and functional, node and its API are mostly
functional. For a simple project, you wont need OOP at all (that would
be development overhead). When you have a complex business logic and
want expandability, for that part it might be a good idea to chose an
objectorient
> I suggest you look at how util.inherits is implemented, then use that
> for inheritance.
I know that is a better idea, which keeps constructor and super_
properties, but it hides the fact that in JavaScript you use
Object.create() even for classical inheritance.
> With regards to your code, th
l the old ones (e.g. with
> obj.__proto__.__proto__.__proto__), so since it's accessible, it will
> not and must not be garbage collected, so, yes, effectively that will
> leak.
>
> On Mar 10, 5:27 pm, Phoscur wrote:
>> Considering that a long chain of prototypes is creat
same point after they get "overshadowed" by the newer
states, or would it become a memory leak?
Am 10.03.2012 22:06, schrieb Marcel Laverdet:
> If you can write it in JS, v8 can garbage collect it.
>
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Phoscur <mailto:phos...@pheelgood
Short Question: Do V8 and Jägermonkey garbage collect prototype chains
at some point?
Let code speak: https://gist.github.com/e83c353f7f16e14e4333
Actually, while writing this, I found the solution (line 69/70), but I
would like to leave it without that, as forgetting it may produce a
memory leak
> I'm trying to figure out if Node will work for our platform or not (or
> even V8 in general). We're planning a rewrite. We use PHP. We need to
> allow users to write server side plugins. For it to be secure in PHP
> we'd have to write a "language" using flex/bison to eliminate dynamic
> function
when you use fs.watchFile? Maybe it
should be marked as deprecated.
Am 03.03.2012 22:16, schrieb Phoscur:
> This is not uncommon when you try to use watch functionality of some
> module on windows.
> Is there a simple workaround to get this without patching the module? I
> mean fs.watc
This is not uncommon when you try to use watch functionality of some
module on windows.
Is there a simple workaround to get this without patching the module? I
mean fs.watch works fine on windows, but apparently the old linux
notation is not supported.
--
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Postin
> 9
> 10
> 11
> 12
> 13
> 14
> 15
> 16
>
> setInterval(function(){
>
> someExpensiveOperation();
> }, 1);
>
What happens here if the operation takes longer than one millisecond?
setInterval will continue to add you operation onto the eventloop while
the execution lags behind -> eventloop i
How is this better than:
function debug(msg) {
if (DEBUG_ON) {
console.log(msg);
}
}
?
Am 28.02.2012 23:55, schrieb JeanHuguesRobert:
> de = false // true when debugging
> de&&mand( cond ) // ie "demand" instead of "assert"
> de&&bug( msg) // ie "debug" to output trace msg
>
> On 27
Crockford himself writes "JSLint will hurt your feelings". We don't need
to discuss what style is the best, it's the same as discussing "the best
programming language". You can't fight about anyone's taste.
JSLint is especially good if you have a problem in you code and can't
find it. JSLint will
Am 18.02.2012 12:51, schrieb Jann Horn:
> 2012/2/18 Phoscur :
>> I think windows integration of node atm is actually better than on ubuntu!
> You call "please compile it yourself" badly integrated? :D
No, but that you have a to open a new console after installing som
First I was a little disapointed by the installer, as it leaves you no
options at all, you can only install to Program Files(x86).
But as I had to install node on ubuntu yesterday and apt-get just didn't
get me an up to date package of npm (v0.2) wtf? Then went to download
the binaries and had to w
that - I think someone recently patched
> it, not sure.
>
>> Am 14.02.2012 02:50 schrieb "Phoscur" > <mailto:phos...@pheelgood.net>>:
>>
>> Well it seems it's still somewhat unstable as the module I'm using
>> does not work as expecte
Well it seems it's still somewhat unstable as the module I'm using does
not work as expected (and not as without symlink). Could that be a
problem in path.dirname or path. normalize?
Am 14.02.2012 00:08, schrieb Phoscur:
> Just updated my nodejs to be sure, from 6.8 to 6.10,
Just updated my nodejs to be sure, from 6.8 to 6.10, now it works..
Couldn't find an entry of this in the changelog..
Am 14.02.2012 00:00, schrieb Kevin Swiber:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Phoscur <mailto:phos...@pheelgood.net>> wrote:
>
> The object (even in t
The object (even in the REPL) I get is empty({}), it should be a function.
It seems node does not follow windows symlinks.
Am 13.02.2012 23:21, schrieb Kevin Swiber:
>
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Phoscur <mailto:phos...@pheelgood.net>> wrote:
>
> > &quo
> "npm link"
>> How do I accomplish this on windows?
> You're screwed, I guess.
Oh man, but I want this!!
Windows 7 is able to make symbolic links too "mklink", but it seems all
I get back from a symlinked folder is an empty object..?
Am 13.02.2012 21:11, s
Hi,
After reading this:
http://www.debuggable.com/posts/how-to-fork-patch-npm-modules:4e2eb9f3-e584-44be-b1a9-3db7cbdd56cb
I see there is a nice way to replace broken modules with your own
patched ones. But this always involves git push and npm update commands
when you change something. Isn't there
ght dependency parsing (probably with help of UglifyJS)
What does that mean?
Am 10.02.2012 01:59, schrieb Phoscur:
> Looks good! I'll give it a try!
>
> Am 10.02.2012 00:21, schrieb Mariusz Nowak:
>> @Phoscur, give modules-webmake
>> <https://github.com/medikoo/modules-web
Looks good! I'll give it a try!
Am 10.02.2012 00:21, schrieb Mariusz Nowak:
> @Phoscur, give modules-webmake
> <https://github.com/medikoo/modules-webmake> a try, with plain written
> requires it will just work (no matter if it's same or external package
> modul
hing like:
>
> require("someFile", function(someModule){
>
> });
>
> Browserify does not handle this use case at all. Yes, if you want to
> concat and minify all your js into a single file and load that file
> everywhere, sure, go right ahead, but you're doing it wrong
I think you haven't actually understood how browserify/browserbuild work:
1. load source files
2. wrap a function around them
3. concat all of them together and add a custom require() emulating
node's require
4. instead of many script tags, insert one with the big file
Now when moduleA requires mo
Then do not load code via ajax.
Am 09.02.2012 22:18, schrieb Mark Hahn:
> > What exactly the problem with using node's synchronous approach in
> the browser?
>
> Node loads the module quickly from the disk. Loading over an ajax
> request is much slower.
>
> --
> Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.
d/event-key/event-key-min.js&yui3/build/dom-style/dom-style-min.js&yui3/build/node-style/node-style-min.js&yui3/build/transition/transition-min.js&yui3/build/cookie/cookie-min.js&yui3/build/intl/intl-min.js</a>>"
> async >
>
> You could fairly easily do
Splitting this from Build tool.
What I want:
-given entry.js, the tool has to resolve it's dependencies inspecting
require, recursivly including all relevant files
-conviently do jslint/hint checks as codestrings are already loaded
-possibility to minify for production
-filewatching and possibly c
t; --
> Paolo Fragomeni
> Co-founder, CTO
> Nodejitsu, Inc.
> www.twitter.com/hij1nx
> www.github.com/hij1nx
>
>
>
> On Feb 2, 10:42 am, Phoscur wrote:
>> Yes, both browserifyand browserbuild assemble a concatenated file with
>> all files used
Hi,
I just heard the cast, and I was quite happy that you are talking about
a theme I'm still struggeling with: build tools (continue the discussion
on this on this topic:
https://groups.google.com/group/nodejs/browse_thread/thread/9814da6a8873db2f/fdfaefa8ca5db7aa
)
First off: Please check the ca
(so this
is indeed the dependency resolving i ment).
Am 02.02.2012 06:51, schrieb hij1nx:
> do any of these do automatic dependency resolving?
>
>
> On Feb 1, 12:23 am, Phoscur wrote:
>> Great, an alternative to browserify! This is perfect. Now I can choose a
>> build proc
sion?
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Bert Belder wrote:
>> On Feb 1, 8:44 am, Phoscur wrote:
>>> Some hours ago I installed node v0.7.1 because of the path.exists bug,
>>> now I can't install another module because it's dependency explictly
>>> doe
Some hours ago I installed node v0.7.1 because of the path.exists bug,
now I can't install another module because it's dependency explictly
doesn't support node >0.7. On *nix I know there is nvm to manage
multiple node versions, but what can I use on windows?
The installer won't even let me downgra
Great, an alternative to browserify! This is perfect. Now I can choose a
build process to combine this with.
Thanks a lot!
So far I've seen
cake, grunt and codesurgeon for the build process
and
enderjs, requirejs, pakmanager, browserify and browserbuild to port node
modules to the browserside.
Th
Looks like another solid build tool.
It doesn't meet all my requirements though:
> -browser-side require() replacement
> -automatic dependency resolving and including files
> and the ability to run on filechanges.
31.01.2012 23:28, Tim Branyen wrote:
> Check out:
>
> http://github.com/cowboy/grun
> Your directory structure might look like this:
>
> - project
> - browser
> - server
>
Where do you put code, you use on both sides?
I should be possible with just an entry point, say src/browser.js, to
scan throw the whole source directories bundling all files, getting
modules it can't find
; smart.
>
> RequireJS seems to be the most popular. I didn't use it because I
> didn't understand AMD before I had written pakmanager.
>
>
> UglifyJS and google closure can minify
>
>
> Some of those other things - such as linting - you can just run in a
> bash scr
www.twitter.com/hij1nx
> www.github.com/hij1nx
>
>
> On Jan 31, 1:52 pm, deitch wrote:
>> Been a long ongoing discussion about this
>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/nodejs/browse_thread/thread/4f5270afb0...
>>
>> On Jan 31, 11:31 am, Phoscur wrote:
>>
eitch:
> Been a long ongoing discussion about this at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs/browse_thread/thread/4f5270afb0de400f
>
> On Jan 31, 11:31 am, Phoscur wrote:
>> So, this means, there are no other build tools out there?
>>
>> Am 30.01.2012 17:48, schrieb Phoscu
44 matches
Mail list logo
