Among other reasons, C++ doesn't run on web browsers.
On Tuesday, October 2, 2012 4:20:42 PM UTC-7, dmorilha wrote:
so all of this to end up with a type safe, which compiles, has classes and
the the syntax reminds C.
So why not use C++?
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Dominick Pham
A word about saving debugging time through statical typing: I come from
java, and i can tell, that the strongly typed environment never reduced the
debugging effort for me. 'use strict'-pragma, inclusive existence checking
and unit-test save me from debugging not statical types. in comparison
+1 on this being blogged. not into TypeScript but would be very interested
in you elaborating on the two rules / js optimization info you mention in
the beginning.
On Monday, October 1, 2012 4:11:12 PM UTC-7, Dick Hardt wrote:
+1 to putting this on your blog Isaac.
On Oct 1, 2012, at 3:50
Having intellisense and code completion is a great thing,
Code completion works quite well in sublime text 2. It just looks at all
your files and makes very intelligent guesses.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Stephen Handley
stephen.hand...@gmail.comwrote:
+1 on this being blogged. not
AFAIK Sublime doesn't look all the files, it just provide code completion
for the words within the current file. I saw a while ago an extension that
did something alike but it was very slow.
*My point is* that *this* code completion is useful and it is cheap;
- I don't have to change to
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Stephen Handley
stephen.hand...@gmail.comwrote:
+1 on this being blogged. not into TypeScript but would be very interested
in you elaborating on the two rules / js optimization info you mention in
the beginning.
Stephen,
Isaac was kind enough to post this
semi-related note, I'm very impressed that cloud9 already has TypeScript
support
https://c9.io/site/blog/2012/10/typescript-support-in-cloud9/
--
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines:
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message
What is your opinion of the value TypeScript can bring to node.js
development?
What is TypeScript: http://www.typescriptlang.org/Playground/
1h video by Anders Hajlsberg:
http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Anders-Hejlsberg-Introducing-TypeScript
Thanks,
Tomasz
--
Job Board:
...+ Brings Visual Studio developers to node.js..., or viceversa?
Btw, there is also plugins for Sublime Text, Vim, Emacs.
I think it is awesome!
Atenciosamente,
Leza Morais Lutonda, Lemol-C
http://lemolsoft.webs.com
http://github.com/lemol
http://twitter.com/lemolsoft
El 01-Oct-12 5:30 PM,
2012/10/1 Dick Hardt dick.ha...@gmail.com
+ Brings Visual Studio developers to node.js
I was wondering about this... in the
videohttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Anders-Hejlsberg-Introducing-TypeScript
he
does a lot of emphasis in the code completion (intellisense). What is the
value of this
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 4:40 PM, José F. Romaniello
jfromanie...@gmail.comwrote:
2012/10/1 Dick Hardt dick.ha...@gmail.com
+ Brings Visual Studio developers to node.js
I was wondering about this... in the
videohttp://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Anders-Hejlsberg-Introducing-TypeScript
he
El 01-Oct-12 5:40 PM, José F. Romaniello escribió:
I was wondering about this... in the video
http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Anders-Hejlsberg-Introducing-TypeScript he
does a lot of emphasis in the code completion (intellisense). What is
the value of this outside Visual Studio? Why you will
On Oct 1, 2012, at 1:40 PM, José F. Romaniello jfromanie...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/10/1 Dick Hardt dick.ha...@gmail.com
+ Brings Visual Studio developers to node.js
I was wondering about this... in the video he does a lot of emphasis in the
code completion (intellisense). What is the
2012/10/1 Lemol Morais Lutonda leza...@fecrd.cujae.edu.cu
At http://www.typescriptlang.org/#Download: There is also TypeScript
support for other editors http://aka.ms/qwe1qu available.
this is just syntax highlighting, no code completion
--
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting
2012/10/1 Rick Waldron waldron.r...@gmail.com
The benefit comes when v8 can super-optimize your code because you have
implied types.
thanks! this is something I didn't know. I see some value there even for
people like me not interested in compile time errors or working in visual
studio
For less sophisticated developers (most people, and most of the VS
market), the compiler errors will remove much debugging frustration and
allow them to focus on creating rather than debugging.
It also allows them to focus on creating instead of understanding what
they are doing. Take the
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Gustavo Machado machad...@gmail.com wrote:
For less sophisticated developers (most people, and most of the VS
market), the compiler errors will remove much debugging frustration and
allow them to focus on creating rather than debugging.
It also allows them
The above example is fairly contrived
And useless. The JS would work fine passing it a number.
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Rick Waldron waldron.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Gustavo Machado machad...@gmail.comwrote:
For less sophisticated developers (most
Rick, that's super interesting however I've said most, and there's no
reference to these type of optimizations in TypeScript. It even says in
any browser, in any host, so who will perform those optimizations? Looks
like TypeScript is not. Actually, this:
Greeter.prototype.greet = function(a:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Mark Hahn m...@hahnca.com wrote:
The above example is fairly contrived
And useless. The JS would work fine passing it a number.
Did you actually read the entire example? I said that for you, but thanks
for the additional coverage.
Yes, it will work, that's
Yes, it will work, that's not the point.
Then give me an example that does make the point. I'm a little
thick-headed.
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Rick Waldron waldron.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Mark Hahn m...@hahnca.com wrote:
The above example is fairly
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Gustavo Machado machad...@gmail.com wrote:
Rick, that's super interesting however I've said most, and there's no
reference to these type of optimizations in TypeScript. It even says in
any browser, in any host, so who will perform those optimizations? Looks
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Mark Hahn m...@hahnca.com wrote:
Yes, it will work, that's not the point.
Then give me an example that does make the point. I'm a little
thick-headed.
See my last email to Gustavo.
Rick
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Rick Waldron
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Mark Hahn m...@hahnca.com wrote:
This will allow the runtime to then perform explicit string
optimizations (whatever those might be).
But there aren't any optimizations that can be made. All I'm asking for
is one real use case that does something useful.
if the runtime can assume that no type coercion needs to occur, it can
skip that step all together,
Ok, I get it now. This example is still really weak. You save at most a
few nanoseconds. To me the extra typing wouldn't be worth it.
I have to admit I'm really biased. Not having to type vars
I've been through the paces quite a few times trying to optimize the
hell out of very hot code. In the last few years, this has been
mostly in V8, of course, but the basic principles are not too far off
in different JS environments.
It's important to not put too much weight in rules of thumb,
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Isaac Schlueter i...@izs.me wrote:
I've been through the paces quite a few times trying to optimize the
hell out of very hot code. In the last few years, this has been
mostly in V8, of course, but the basic principles are not too far off
in different JS
It'd be a great idea to write up a TypeScript header file for the API
surface in Node.
Can't it be done with plain js? Something like this
// Implementation file.
fs.readFile = function(name, callback){...}
// Header file with types.
fs.untypedReadFile = fs.readFile
Or shorter, like:
// Header file with types.
fs.untypedReadFile = fs.readFile
fs.readFile = function(name, callback){
expect(name).to.have.type 'string'
fs.untypedReadFile(name, callback)
}
--
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Alexey Petrushin alexey.petrus...@gmail.com
wrote:
It'd be a great idea to write up a TypeScript header file for the API
surface in Node.
Can't it be done with plain js? Something like this
// Implementation file.
fs.readFile = function(name,
+1 to putting this on your blog Isaac.
On Oct 1, 2012, at 3:50 PM, Rick Waldron waldron.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Isaac Schlueter i...@izs.me wrote:
I've been through the paces quite a few times trying to optimize the
hell out of very hot code. In the last few
I'm sorry I don't have Windows running to test it on. Can you write
multiple constructors/methods of varying types? How does TypeScript
translate this code to equivalent JS code?
constructor (message: string) {
this.greeting = message;
}
constructor (message: number) {
this.greeting = message;
I just tried in the playground
(http://www.typescriptlang.org/Playground/) and unfortunately it
doesn't work.
I also was hoping it could do this, but it's not a simple task if the
underlying language doesn't support it
(I wrote a Java to ActionScript converter and this is still one of the
few
Okay I just tried it in the TypeScript playground. Doesn't seem like it
supports translating multiple constructors/methods. Also, support for
pre-initialization of variables before constructor is invoked would also be
a good feature. However, TypeScript is definitely a step in the right
direction.
IMHO, TypeScript makes Javascript feel like ActionScript/Java/C#...
loss JavaScript's agility, and the things smell awful enterprise
My vote goes to coffeescript
Regards,
ty
2012/10/2 Shripad K assortmentofso...@gmail.com
Okay I just tried it in the TypeScript playground. Doesn't seem like
35 matches
Mail list logo
