[This article just started making its rounds on the net... nothing really
surprising for those who have been following Prince's religious life over
the past decade or so. Still, don't recall reading such direct candid
statements before re: politics/religion/Republicans/Democrats.--NPS]
The printed quote about his opinion on gay marriage and abortion comes
off as a bit homophobic, don't you think? If he made it, he probably
didn't realize that it sounded that way. If it's a total misquote,
then it really emphasizes how ridiculously naive his no tape
recorders rule is (was?).
Totally agree.The New Yorker is not known for sensational journalism. I also
agree that this is a sad development for those of us who have followed him a
long time.
The difference here Derek, in my opinion, is that in the past we
haven't seen evidence of such distain. I understand growing and
I concur with both Derek Amil... The view (ag. gay marriage, etc.) that
he expressed would be totally consistent with his professed JW beliefs...
The way he is reported as expressing it, though (they want to put IT in
wherever), comes off as crass, base, unsophisticated, and simplistic as
those
http://www.drfunkenberry.com/2008/11/17/prince-new-yorker-article-full-of-mi
s
quotes/
« Katt Williams Checked Into Psychiatric Hospital?
Funk Blurb; Prince Cleans Ears With Q-Tip In Vegas »
PRINCE NEW YORKER ARTICLE FULL OF MISQUOTES
We were just sent this:
Prince did an interview with
Whoa!! The New Yorker is not known for sensational journalism? What about that
Barack Obama / Michelle Obama cover that depicted them as terrorist/radicals. I
read a New York Times article about the owners Conde Nast, where it was stated
that they like to stir up a controversy every now and
