Re: [ns] max length of hello packet

ximum number of addresses advertised on a message. #define OLSR_MAX_ADDRS 64 I've fixed it to a higher value and the problem was solved. Unfortunately, I don't know if this fix has collateral effects :-( Regards Víctor González El sáb, 03-03-2007 a las 17:12 +, d

[ns] Hello Interval bug in UM-OLSR implementation

OLSR_NEIGHB_HOLD_TIME is 3*OLSR_REFRESH_INTERVAL, which is always 2. To correct it you may assign OLSR_REFRESH_INTERVAL to hello_ival Regards, Víctor González.

Re: [ns] HELP WITH 802.11 I NEED TO CONTROL BER

Hi, try to check this extension: http://www.telematica.polito.it/fiore/ bye, Víctor González El mar, 31-10-2006 a las 11:14 -0600, Edwin Cruz escribió: > > > > > > > Hi Guys > > > > I have a problem whith 802.11. > > > > I need a form

Re: [ns] Wireless simulation with high speed nodes

also to compare the simulation with the theoretical > propagation model equations . > > Regards > > Miguel > > > Víctor González <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > > > Hi all, > > we are simulating a wireless scenar

[ns] Wireless simulation with high speed nodes

x27;t lost packets in our tracefile. We also tried to simulate without the extensions we mentioned previously with the same result. We think this is a very strange situation, may be, produced by some mistake in our NS2 script. You can see it below. Thanks to all and kind regards, Víctor Gonzál

Re: [ns] Shadowing propagation model problem with NS 2.29

OK, thanks, your answer has been very helpful. Víctor. El mié, 27-09-2006 a las 19:17 +0200, Daniel Mahrenholz escribió: > Víctor González schrieb: > > Hi, > > I am simulating an ad-hoc environment under NS 2.29 in a Ubuntu > > 6.06(Dapper) LTS. > > In m

[ns] Shadowing propagation model problem with NS 2.29

this bug was fixed in the ns 2.28 version. So, why I am getting this huge value? Maybe it comes from an incorrect parameter I am giving to the Shadowing propagation model? Thanks for your help Víctor González