> certainly does have an effect on credibility.
> --
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Steven Millward
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 18 February 2009 12:38
>
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:*
lward
Sent: Wednesday, 18 February 2009 2:41 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Re: Where are you Steve? [sec=unclassified]
It's OK. You can pick Friend, Edwards and Collins ahead of the other
three if you think that's what's best for the team.
I just wanted
f Of *Steven Millward
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 18 February 2009 1:38 PM
>
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* [NSWolves] Re: Where are you Steve? [sec=unclassified]
>
> You're suggesting selecting:
>
> Dave Edwards over Foley (who is thought to be the player of the season an
18 February 2009 12:38
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Re: Where are you Steve? [sec=unclassified]
You're suggesting selecting:
Dave Edwards over Foley (who is thought to be the player of the season
and almost always has a good game)
George Friend over Jarvis
Collins over Berra (
ups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Re: Where are you Steve? [sec=unclassified]
You're suggesting selecting:
Dave Edwards over Foley (who is thought to be the player of the season
and almost always has a good game)
George Friend over Jarvis
Collins over Berra (and you've slagged off Collins bef
s. Put
> the lads in who are hungry to prove themselves.
>
> --
> *From*: nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *To*: nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Sent*: Wed Feb 18 09:54:15 2009
>
> *Subject*: [NSWolves] Re: Where are you Steve? [sec=unclassified]
>
> In
ading) .
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Paul Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, 18 February 2009 11:56 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Re: Where are you Steve? [sec=unclassified]
As Paul states below, not only if we keep clean sheets, we ma
und the players, then the team
will gain in confidence and go on another run towards the end of the season.
From: pcr...@contechengineering.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Re: Where are you Steve? [sec=unclassified]
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:13:51 +1100
m
[mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Wednesday, 18 February 2009 08:54
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Re: Where are you Steve? [sec=unclassified]
Interesting point Lee. This is the team that pl
en Millward
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 18 February 2009 08:54
>
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* [NSWolves] Re: Where are you Steve? [sec=unclassified]
>
> Interesting point Lee. This is the team that played that Birmingham
> match. So you are suggesting that
elves.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wed Feb 18 09:54:15 2009
Subject: [NSWolves] Re: Where are you Steve? [sec=unclassified]
Interesting point Lee. This is the team that played that Birmingham match. So
you are suggesting that Mick should
groups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Wednesday, 18 February 2009 08:54
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Re: Where are you Steve? [sec=unclassified]
Interesting point Lee. This is the team that played that Birmingham
match. So you are suggesting
s a good indicator.
>
> --
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Steven Millward
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 17 February 2009 20:01
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* [NSWolves] Re: Where are you
ted ahead of them. That's scraping the barrel.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tue Feb 17 21:00:38 2009
Subject: [NS
ps.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 17 February 2009 20:01
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Re: Where are you Steve? [sec=unclassified]
Have you seen anything in the last month/2 months to suggest we are on
our way to improving our current predicament?
Yes, we ha
> was hit at him.
> *
>
> *
>
> 2009/2/17 Marcus Chantry
>
>> You're having a laugh! You really think a carling cup match against an
>> under-strength blues side is reason to think we're going to get promoted
>> ahead of them. That's scraping the
going to get promoted
> ahead of them. That's scraping the barrel.
>
> --
> *From*: nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *To*: nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Sent*: Tue Feb 17 21:00:38 2009
> *Subject*: [NSWolves] Re: Where are you Steve? [sec=unclassified]
>
.com
Sent: Tue Feb 17 21:00:38 2009
Subject: [NSWolves] Re: Where are you Steve? [sec=unclassified]
Have you seen anything in the last month/2 months to suggest we are on our way
to improving our current predicament?
Yes, we hammered our promotion rivals Birmingham in the cup in their own ba
Have you seen anything in the last month/2 months to suggest we are on our
way to improving our current predicament?
*Yes, we hammered our promotion rivals Birmingham in the cup in their own
back yard. That was about a month ago. If they are our only competition
for second spot then I'm not too
uesday, 17 February 2009 5:11 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Re: Where are you Steve? [sec=unclassified]
"This brings me back to my original point. When Wolves are playing well,
you expect their form to turn bad. When Wolves are playing bad you expect
their form t
"This brings me back to my original point. When Wolves are playing
well, you expect their form to turn bad. When Wolves are playing bad
you expect their form to stay bad."
When we were playing well I don't recall saying anything to suggest that
I expected our form to suddenly turn bad. I do re
t: Tuesday, 17 February 2009 4:16 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Re: Where are you Steve? [sec=unclassified]
Isn't it strange how earlier in the season when we were doing well almost
everyone on this list was make predictions about where we would finish if we
maintai
ints
> per game) which was such an important harbinger only 2 months ago. Why is
> that so?
>
> --
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Nick Curtis
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 17 February 2009 3:45 PM
> *To:* nswolves@goog
e half way mark.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of LEESE Matthew
Sent: Tuesday, 17 February 2009 15:32
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Re: Where are you Steve? [sec=unclassified]
Depends on the def
uesday, 17 February 2009 4:28 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Re: Where are you Steve? [sec=unclassified]
I will guarantee it won't be enough on current form, at least two teams will
overhaul us.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.co
bject: [NSWolves] Re: Where are you Steve? [sec=unclassified]
Depends on how many points the other teams stash in their respective
bags.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Tuesday, 17 February 2009 4:
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of LEESE Matthew
Sent: Tuesday, 17 February 2009 4:22 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Re: Where are you Steve? [sec=unclassified]
Points in the bag are what dictate your league position. Nob
15:22
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Re: Where are you Steve? [sec=unclassified]
Points in the bag are what dictate your league position. Nobody gets promoted
or relegated at the end of the season based on the 'current form table'.
bject: [NSWolves] Re: Where are you Steve? [sec=unclassified]
Points in the bag are what dictate your league position. Nobody gets
promoted or relegated at the end of the season based on the 'current
form table'.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.co
t: Tuesday, 17 February 2009 4:16 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Re: Where are you Steve? [sec=unclassified]
Isn't it strange how earlier in the season when we were doing well almost
everyone on this list was make predictions about where we would finish if we
maintained t
is that so?
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Nick Curtis
Sent: Tuesday, 17 February 2009 3:45 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Re: Where are you Steve? [sec=unclassified]
We are third from bottom in current
ooglegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Tuesday, 17 February 2009 3:09 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Re: Where are you Steve? [sec=unclassified]
On balance I'd say we are now one of the worst teams, we need to take into
account that most of our points wer
We are third from bottom in current form based upon the last 8 games!
From: "Morris, Lee SGT"
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, 17 February, 2009 2:08:58 PM
Subject: [NSWolves] Re: Where are you Steve? [sec=unclassified]
On balance I&#x
oment, we are rubbish - that's a fact.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 17 February 2009 2:52 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Re: Where are you Steve?
We have a g
inish, with the lead we had, it really
shouldn't be.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 17 February 2009 13:52
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Re: Where are you Ste
We have a good chance of getting promoted. We are, I still believe, one of
the best two teams in the division. On balance so far, we are *the* best
team as we have scored the most points.
If these last nine matches had been interspersed amongst the other games,
we'd still be where we are, it's j
36 matches
Mail list logo
