No, only in my handbag!
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Sent: Fri Oct 15 15:29:02 2010
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Hunt
There's no need to be embarassed about loving a big strapping chap like Greg.
Have you got a picture of h
record too! LMFAO
>
> --
> *From*: nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *To*: nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Sent*: Fri Oct 15 14:49:53 2010
> *Subject*: Re: [BTMO] Hunt
>
> No you suggested Halford in preference to Hunt, Bia, Hunt, Fletcher,
> Doyle and Jarvis.
>
> You love Greg Hal
You're full of $h1te and now I've put that on record too! LMFAO
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Sent: Fri Oct 15 14:49:53 2010
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Hunt
No you suggested Halford in preference to Hunt, Bia, Hunt
Hunt against
> the 'ammers.
>
> --
> *From*: nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *To*: nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Sent*: Fri Oct 15 13:42:33 2010
> *Subject*: Re: [BTMO] Hunt
>
> Yes, we should try to get down to ten men as soon as poss
Don't forget I only suggested Halford In preference to risking Hunt against the
'ammers.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Sent: Fri Oct 15 13:42:33 2010
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Hunt
Yes, we should try to get down to
glegroups.com
> *To*: nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Sent*: Fri Oct 15 13:10:09 2010
> *Subject*: RE: [BTMO] Hunt
>
>
>
>
>
> Sorry Steve, that explains it.
>
>
>
> I can see how BTMO Marcus would love to see Halford streaking down the wing
> mesmerizing his fu
: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Hunt
Read my comments Paul. I want him purely to rough up the opponent (he doesn't
have a silky skills)
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Sent: Fri Oct 15 13:10:09 2010
Subject: RE:
Read my comments Paul. I want him purely to rough up the opponent (he doesn't
have a silky skills)
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Sent: Fri Oct 15 13:10:09 2010
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Hunt
Sorry Steve, that explai
;
>
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Steven Millward
> *Sent:* Friday, 15 October 2010 1:04 PM
>
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Hunt
>
>
>
> Well he has played in that position so he was a
Sent: Friday, 15 October 2010 1:04 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Hunt
Well he has played in that position so he was an option I listed. Marcus
wanted to play him on the wing, not me
On 15 October 2010 12:43, Paul Crowe wrote:
What are you on Steve?
Halford
l” game.
>
>
>
> I’d rather your Nan play than him!!
>
>
>
> Hoping the Hammers play crap and we sneak a win.
>
>
>
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Steven Millward
> *Sent:* Thursday, 14 October 2010 3
On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Thursday, 14 October 2010 3:18 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Hunt
Hunt is a hard tacker though. He smashed Cech's skull in.
We're easy to read with only one winger. Halford maybe. After a dire game
of football I could see u
BPMCO!
_
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Thursday, 14 October 2010 2:20 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Hunt
Not sure he's worth risking in what will be a blood and guts battle. I
om] *On
>> Behalf Of *LEESE Matthew
>> *Sent:* Thursday, 14 October 2010 2:25 PM
>>
>> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
>> *Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Hunt
>>
>>
>>
>> Now, now Marcus, you can't be encouraging hard tackling. Danny Murphy
>> would not b
s.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *LEESE Matthew
> *Sent:* Thursday, 14 October 2010 2:25 PM
>
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Hunt
>
>
>
> Now, now Marcus, you can't be encouraging hard tackling. Danny Murphy would
> no
2:20 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Hunt
Not sure he's worth risking in what will be a blood and guts battle.
I'd rather see Halford (who can tackle hard) or Edwards (who is
expendable) put into the side than risk Hunt picking up another injury
because he isn't mat
olves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Hunt
Not sure he's worth risking in what will be a blood and guts battle. I'd
rather see Halford (who can tackle hard) or Edwards (who is expendable) put
into the side than risk Hunt picking up another injury because he isn't match
fit. Better
Not sure he's worth risking in what will be a blood and guts battle.
I'd rather see Halford (who can tackle hard) or Edwards (who is
expendable) put into the side than risk Hunt picking up another injury
because he isn't match fit. Better to preserve him for Championship
football where he has prov
18 matches
Mail list logo
