On 2/18/2016 9:37 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On 18 February 2016 at 10:22, Hans Hagen wrote:
this brings up the question: would users (here) start using real math
unicode input if we had a monospace math font?
On Mac (TextMate, but I assume other editors would behave the same)
the system proba
On 18 February 2016 at 10:22, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> this brings up the question: would users (here) start using real math
> unicode input if we had a monospace math font?
On Mac (TextMate, but I assume other editors would behave the same)
the system probably does some character substitution, so as
On 2016-02-18, at 10:22, Hans Hagen wrote:
> this brings up the question: would users (here) start using real math
> unicode input if we had a monospace math font?
FWIW, you can have Emacs automatically display ∫ in place of \int
etc. in your file (and this is no real substitution, just for vi
On 18 Feb 2016, at 10:16, Hans Hagen mailto:pra...@wxs.nl>>
wrote:
also, DEK used a keyboard with some special characters (probably dating from
those assembler like computer languages) which is why the plain tex format has:
Could it have been a keyboard especially for the APL language? Just a
On 2/18/2016 1:38 AM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:40:39 +0100
Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
Excuse me, Alan, this is exclamation in Spanish (and only in Spanish).
Bigre ! Of course, I know that.
Just out of curiosity, why do you think he should have chosen that?
I was attempting
On 2/18/2016 12:40 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 02/17/2016 11:18 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 20:08:31 +0100 Hans Hagen wrote:
you're an american citizen who likes $x^2$ but to call if
beautiful ... €x^2€ nor £x^2£ (in 8 bit encodings / local keyboards
times) all look bad ...
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:40:39 +0100
Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
> Excuse me, Alan, this is exclamation in Spanish (and only in Spanish).
Bigre ! Of course, I know that.
> Just out of curiosity, why do you think he should have chosen that?
I was attempting to make some fun with this thread.
More ser
On 02/17/2016 11:18 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 20:08:31 +0100 Hans Hagen wrote:
>
>> you're an american citizen who likes $x^2$ but to call if
>> beautiful ... €x^2€ nor £x^2£ (in 8 bit encodings / local keyboards
>> times) all look bad ...
>
> Hans, you forgot: ¥x^2¥, ₽x^2₽,
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:24:53 -0500
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> I am curious to know if there is ANYONE who types in a lot of math
> and regularly uses \m{...} or \math{...}. I still use $$ and use
> \math{..} or \mathematics{...} only when generating output from lua
> code: context.math("") e
I use $…$. And for copying text from one TeX to another (e.g. ConTeXt <—>
PlainTex/Latex/Markdown/Jax), it would be a pain if I couldn't.
Michael
> On Feb 17, 2016, at 1:24 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
>
>> However, I can see situations where one might
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
However, I can see situations where one might want to tighten spacing
in order to fit a particular expression within a line or in a table,
for example. Here, \math[options]{expression} is a reasonable syntax,
yet I cannot foresee ever using the very crypt
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:44:43 +0100
Hans Hagen wrote:
> also, but don't tell alan, there is this:
>
> \m[i:tight]{}
>
> i:default, i:tight, i:half, i:fixed
I spy...
I would suggest that one would set (inline) math spacing and other
options (like \mathscriptsmode) globally for a document, a
On 2/17/2016 8:31 AM, Otared Kavian wrote:
I agree totally with Alan in saying that the inline math signals $\cdots$
should NEVER be left out from ConTeXt, or even become deprecated.
that was never the intention (as one can always run in asciimode) but
what's being discussed here is more robu
I agree totally with Alan in saying that the inline math signals $\cdots$
should NEVER be left out from ConTeXt, or even become deprecated.
Indeed many people move mathematical texts from one file to another one, in
order to be able to typeset or print it either with ConTeXt, or other
macro-pa
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:59:58 +0100
Marco Patzer wrote:
> > What sort of needs for structure could \m address for inline math?
> > Clearly, an equation to which one might want to have a reference
> > math should appear rather as displayed math.
>
> While I agree on that one, writing \math{x^2}
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:20:04 +0100
Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 2/16/2016 4:59 PM, Marco Patzer wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:21:42 -0700
> > Alan BRASLAU wrote:
> >
> >> I do note that the VIM syntax highlighting routine is pretty poor
> >> and has difficulties around $, which is a symbol that
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016, Marco Patzer wrote:
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:21:42 -0700
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
I do note that the VIM syntax highlighting routine is pretty poor and
has difficulties around $, which is a symbol that I like using
(unpaired) quite a lot in MetaPost (\startMPcode...\stopMPcode).
On 2/16/2016 4:59 PM, Marco Patzer wrote:
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:21:42 -0700
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
I do note that the VIM syntax highlighting routine is pretty poor and
has difficulties around $, which is a symbol that I like using
(unpaired) quite a lot in MetaPost (\startMPcode...\stopMPcode).
On 2/16/2016 4:21 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
What sort of needs for structure could \m address for inline math?
Clearly, an equation to which one might want to have a reference
math should appear rather as displayed math.\def\m#1{\startimath
you being a mathematics-physics-chemistry mixed mode us
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:21:42 -0700
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
> I do note that the VIM syntax highlighting routine is pretty poor and
> has difficulties around $, which is a symbol that I like using
> (unpaired) quite a lot in MetaPost (\startMPcode...\stopMPcode).
The stock vim context syntax highligh
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:54:25 +0100
Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 2/16/2016 9:22 AM, Nicola wrote:
> > I read in the wiki (http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Math) that $…$
> > for inline math is deprecated in favor of \m{…} and more verbose
> > variants. Is that really the case? If so, what is the reason and
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:22:23 +0100
Nicola wrote:
> I read in the wiki (http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Math) that $…$
> for inline math is deprecated in favor of \m{…} and more verbose
> variants. Is that really the case? If so, what is the reason and
> what are the differences?
When \asciimode is
On 2/16/2016 9:22 AM, Nicola wrote:
I read in the wiki (http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Math) that $…$
for inline math is deprecated in favor of \m{…} and more verbose
variants. Is that really the case? If so, what is the reason and
what are the differences?
that page probably needs updating
any
I read in the wiki (http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Math) that $…$
for inline math is deprecated in favor of \m{…} and more verbose
variants. Is that really the case? If so, what is the reason and
what are the differences?
Nicola
___
24 matches
Mail list logo