Re: [NTG-context] No MP graphics after installation under MikTeX

2003-06-10 Thread Sytse Knypstra
Thank you, Peter Rolf, for your suggestion. The tool Filemon showed me that directories were searched from an old 4TeX installation which I thought I had completely removed. I searched my whole hard disk for files which contained these paths and -if possible- deleted them. Then I ran my test docu

Re: [NTG-context] No MP graphics after installation under MikTeX

2003-06-10 Thread Peter Rolf
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: Friday, June 6, 2003 Sytse Knypstra wrote: SK> Yes, I still get the same warning message SK> and yes, c:\localtexmf\context\perltk is in my MS-DOS path (step 0 in my SK> list of steps). I'm lost. If your sample document is small, could you send it over to me? Maybe some

Re[4]: [NTG-context] No MP graphics after installation under MikTeX

2003-06-07 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Friday, June 6, 2003 Sytse Knypstra wrote: SK> Yes, I still get the same warning message SK> and yes, c:\localtexmf\context\perltk is in my MS-DOS path (step 0 in my SK> list of steps). I'm lost. If your sample document is small, could you send it over to me? -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta __

Re[3]: [NTG-context] No MP graphics after installation under MikTeX

2003-06-06 Thread Sytse Knypstra
At 16:16 06.06.2003, you wrote: Friday, June 6, 2003 Sytse Knypstra wrote: SK> 16. A simple testfile with a short text, a flowchart and a metafun graphic SK> does not generate the graphics, but only the texts. Uhm. I really don't see why it wouldn't work. Do you still get the same warning mes

Re[3]: [NTG-context] No MP graphics after installation under MikTeX

2003-06-06 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Friday, June 6, 2003 Sytse Knypstra wrote: SK> 16. A simple testfile with a short text, a flowchart and a metafun graphic SK> does not generate the graphics, but only the texts. Uhm. I really don't see why it wouldn't work. Do you still get the same warning message about not being able to ru

Re[2]: [NTG-context] No MP graphics after installation under MikTeX

2003-06-06 Thread Sytse Knypstra
I (re)installed MikTeX 2.3 and ConTeXt according to the following steps and then ran (outside c:\texmf\miktex\bin): mpost --version. This gave the following result: MiKTeX-MetaPost 2.3.1222 (0.641) (MiKTeX 2.3) Copyright 1990 - 1995 by AT&T Bell Laboratories TeX is a trademark of the American Math

Re[2]: [NTG-context] No MP graphics after installation under MikTeX

2003-06-06 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Friday, June 6, 2003 Matthew Huggett wrote: MH> Isn't metapost called with the command "mp" under MikTeX? Both names are available: c:\texmf\miktex\bin>mp --version MiKTeX-MetaPost 2.3.1222 (0.641) (MiKTeX 2.3) Copyright 1990 - 1995 by AT&T Bell Laboratories TeX is a trademark of the American Mat

Re: [NTG-context] No MP graphics after installation under MikTeX

2003-06-06 Thread Matthew Huggett
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: Friday, June 6, 2003 Sytse Knypstra wrote: SK>> But I noticed the warning (not in the log-file): SK> Unknown command "mpost" SK> Does this give a clue to what is wrong? Yes, you either don't have metapost installed or it's not in the path. SK> I found a file mp

Re[3]: [NTG-context] No MP graphics after installation under MikTeX

2003-06-06 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Friday, June 6, 2003 Sytse Knypstra wrote: SK>> But I noticed the warning (not in the log-file): >>SK> Unknown command "mpost" >> >>SK> Does this give a clue to what is wrong? >> >>Yes, you either don't have metapost installed or it's not in >>the path. SK> I found a file mpost.exe (only 4 kb) i

Re[2]: [NTG-context] No MP graphics after installation under MikTeX

2003-06-06 Thread Sytse Knypstra
SK> But I noticed the warning (not in the log-file): SK> Unknown command "mpost" SK> Does this give a clue to what is wrong? Yes, you either don't have metapost installed or it's not in the path. -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta I found a file mpost.exe (only 4 kb) in c:\texmf\miktex\bin. Is this s

Re[2]: [NTG-context] No MP graphics after installation under MikTeX

2003-06-04 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Wednesday, June 4, 2003 Sytse Knypstra wrote: SK> Thank you, Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta and Helmut SK> Schwertner, for your advice. SK> In texexec.ini I added --enable-write18 to the line: SK> for miktex set TeXPassString to --alias=context SK> I ran texexec --make en nl metafun mptopdf,

Re: [NTG-context] No MP graphics after installation under MikTeX

2003-06-04 Thread Sytse Knypstra
Thank you, Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta and Helmut Schwertner, for your advice. In texexec.ini I added --enable-write18 to the line: for miktex set TeXPassString to --alias=context I ran texexec --make en nl metafun mptopdf, regenerated the filename database and tried my example again. The r

Re: [NTG-context] No MP graphics after installation under MikTeX

2003-06-03 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Tuesday, June 3, 2003 Sytse Knypstra wrote: SK> 2. Install MikTeX 2.2 (large). The localtexmf and texmf trees are generated. BTW there's a more recent MiKTeX (2.3). SK> 12. In c:\texmf\miktex\config we find the file miktex.ini SK> Under the heading [ConTeXt] add: SK> pool_size=100

[NTG-context] No MP graphics after installation under MikTeX

2003-06-03 Thread Sytse Knypstra
Dear ConTeXt users, I tried to (re)install ConTeXt under MikTeX in the following way, but a simple test file with a flowchart and a MP graphic gave me the texts of the flowchart only. Can anybody give me advice? Thank you in advance, Sytse Knypstra These are the steps I took: 0. Perl has alre