Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

On 6/8/2017 4:29 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: And indeed, in luatex 1.05 the primes look fine again. The prime in the fraction is too low, but I take Hans' "Such is life" and use \over for the rare cases where I have primes inside fractions. I haven

Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: And indeed, in luatex 1.05 the primes look fine again. The prime in the fraction is too low, but I take Hans' "Such is life" and use \over for the rare cases where I have primes inside fractions. I haven't followed the thread carefully, but there

Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:42 AM, luigi scarso wrote: > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: >> I get the same error with revision 6349 from >> https://serveur-svn.lri.fr/svn/modhel/luatex/branches/experimental/ , >> see below. But maybe we are OT on this list now, and shoul

Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: > I get the same error with revision 6349 from > https://serveur-svn.lri.fr/svn/modhel/luatex/branches/experimental/ , > see below. But maybe we are OT on this list now, and should either go > to luatex list or private? not OT, I am check

Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:17 AM, luigi scarso wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: >>> PS: the ./build.sh (Checked out revision 6287) runs for a while, and >>> then stops with an error like this (it is

Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:17 AM, luigi scarso wrote: > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: >> PS: the ./build.sh (Checked out revision 6287) runs for a while, and >> then stops with an error like this (it is probably my fault): >> >> Makefile:368: recipe for target >> '../.

Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: > PS: the ./build.sh (Checked out revision 6287) runs for a while, and > then stops with an error like this (it is probably my fault): > > Makefile:368: recipe for target > '../../../../source/texk/kpathsea/doc/kpathsea.info' failed > make

Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 11:03 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 6/7/2017 9:57 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: > >> In 2017.06.06 13:22 something is still not correct. > > i mentioned that you need a new engine (the garden has 1.0.5 binafies for > windows but other platforms need to be generated) > > > Hans

Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

On 6/7/2017 9:57 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: In 2017.06.06 13:22 something is still not correct. i mentioned that you need a new engine (the garden has 1.0.5 binafies for windows but other platforms need to be generated) Hans ---

Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 9:57 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: >> On 6/4/2017 11:06 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: >>> >>> Hi Mikael, >>> >>> Indeed your observation is correct, but using \over instead of \frac >>> yields the correct behavior. Please try

Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 6/4/2017 11:06 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: >> >> Hi Mikael, >> >> Indeed your observation is correct, but using \over instead of \frac >> yields the correct behavior. Please try the following sample: >> >> %%% begin derivatives-prime-4.tex >> \s

Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

On 6/4/2017 11:06 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: Hi Mikael, Indeed your observation is correct, but using \over instead of \frac yields the correct behavior. Please try the following sample: %%% begin derivatives-prime-4.tex \setupbodyfont[lucidaot] \starttext Compare the position of the prime sig

Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

Hi Mikael, Indeed your observation is correct, but using \over instead of \frac yields the correct behavior. Please try the following sample: %%% begin derivatives-prime-4.tex \setupbodyfont[lucidaot] \starttext Compare the position of the prime sign in $f'/g$ in these two expressions: the fi

Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:05 PM, Mathias Schickel wrote: > >> Am 25.05.2017 um 18:59 schrieb Mikael P. Sundqvist : >> >> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist >> wrote: >>> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Mathias Schickel >>> wrote: Hi Mikael and Otared, I can co

Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

> Am 25.05.2017 um 18:59 schrieb Mikael P. Sundqvist : > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: >> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Mathias Schickel >> wrote: >>> Hi Mikael and Otared, >>> >>> I can confirm issues regarding primes, too. If you are using the STIX 2 >>> f

Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Mathias Schickel > wrote: >> Hi Mikael and Otared, >> >> I can confirm issues regarding primes, too. If you are using the STIX 2 >> fonts (http://www.stixfonts.org) and my example below you get a somew

Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Mathias Schickel wrote: > Hi Mikael and Otared, > > I can confirm issues regarding primes, too. If you are using the STIX 2 > fonts (http://www.stixfonts.org) and my example below you get a somewhat > strange behaviour of primes that is pretty obvious. I think the

Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

Hi Mikael and Otared, I can confirm issues regarding primes, too. If you are using the STIX 2 fonts (http://www.stixfonts.org ) and my example below you get a somewhat strange behaviour of primes that is pretty obvious. I think the issues should be fixed. By the way

Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

Hi Mikael, You are correct, the position of \prime depends on whether there is a next character or not after it, and it seems that this has an effect on its position for characters having a subscript as in $f_{1}''(x) \neq f''_{1}(x)$ $f'f''f'’'$ Best regards: OK > On 22 May 20

Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 10:29 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: > Hi Mikael, > > I agree with what you are reporting: the current behavior of the \prime > operator is not completely satisfying when using ConTeXt mkiv, while in mkii > it is the most satisfying (in my opinion…). > > The turn around consist

Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

Hi Mikael, I agree with what you are reporting: the current behavior of the \prime operator is not completely satisfying when using ConTeXt mkiv, while in mkii it is the most satisfying (in my opinion…). The turn around consisting in using $f^{‘’}$ or $f^{\prime\prime}$, or even $f^{{}^{\pri

Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 7:32 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: > On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: >> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist >> wrote: >>> Den 18 maj 2017 10:13 fm skrev "Otared Kavian" : >>> >>> Hi Hans, >>> >>> Thanks for your explanations.

Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: >> Den 18 maj 2017 10:13 fm skrev "Otared Kavian" : >> >> Hi Hans, >> >> Thanks for your explanations. >> When using constructions such as $f’’_2(x)$, I will adapt my input i

Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: > Den 18 maj 2017 10:13 fm skrev "Otared Kavian" : > > Hi Hans, > > Thanks for your explanations. > When using constructions such as $f’’_2(x)$, I will adapt my input in order > to get what seems correct. > > Best regards: OK > >> On 17

Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

Den 18 maj 2017 10:13 fm skrev "Otared Kavian" : Hi Hans, Thanks for your explanations. When using constructions such as $f’’_2(x)$, I will adapt my input in order to get what seems correct. Best regards: OK > On 17 May 2017, at 17:17, Hans Hagen wrote: > > On 5/17/2017 8:35 AM, Otared Kavian

Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

Hi Hans, Thanks for your explanations. When using constructions such as $f’’_2(x)$, I will adapt my input in order to get what seems correct. Best regards: OK > On 17 May 2017, at 17:17, Hans Hagen wrote: > > On 5/17/2017 8:35 AM, Otared Kavian wrote: >> Hi Hans, >> >> Thanks for having fi

Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

On 5/17/2017 8:35 AM, Otared Kavian wrote: Hi Hans, Thanks for having fixed the behavior of the prime in the latest beta release (ConTeXt version 2017.05.15 21:48). However, as you may see in the two attached PDF files, the result is still incorrect when one types for example $f_2’’(x)$, whic

[NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

Hi Hans, Thanks for having fixed the behavior of the prime in the latest beta release (ConTeXt version 2017.05.15 21:48). However, as you may see in the two attached PDF files, the result is still incorrect when one types for example $f_2’’(x)$, which should give the same result as $f’’_2(x)$.