I've added the info on the bot. But please, if you think something
could be improved, just hit the edit link and do it --- way quicker
than mentioning it on the mailing list and waiting for my sense of
guilt to kick in. ;-) (If you feel insecure, you can always ask for
help or a second opinion, of
> I've added a note to the [[Main Page]] (edit it at
> http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Template:Main_Page), and a note to the
> [[IRC]] page. How does that look to you guys?
Looks good to me. Future will show if this leads to interesting
conversations. Everyone is invited.
> I think that someone wh
>
> Even though the former is correct, I guess LaTeX is a little off-topic.
Perhaps it would be nice to have users know about the LaTeX bot as well in
case they want to compare LaTeX and ConTeXt output. I sure changed my mind
fast. :-)
Troy
__
Looks good to me, although I personally would change
"and there is a bot maintained by Troy Henderson that allows real-time
testing of LaTeX, MetaPost, and ConTeXt code."
to
"and there is a bot maintained by Troy Henderson that allows real-time
testing of MetaPost and ConTeXt code."
Even though
Heya,
I've added a note to the [[Main Page]] (edit it at
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Template:Main_Page), and a note to the
[[IRC]] page. How does that look to you guys? I think that someone who
knows the channel could make a more appetizing description on the
[[IRC]] page than the one I just wr
hi Sietse,
there are normally about 5-10 users online regularly, including me and
Troy, but it would be nice to meet more users there, as a fast help is
easier accomplished via IRC then ML but right ML is nice for a
searchable help and as Marco said a secondary helpsystem...
That channel was desi
I have bots running in #latex and #context that allows users to test LaTeX,
MetaPost, and ConTeXt code in real time and have a URL generated for the
output of their code (or a log file of the compilation process if their
code fails to compile). I also keep logs of these rooms, and these logs
can b
On 2012-09-07 Bill Meahan wrote:
> After being on the internet since the early 1980's I can say with
> certainty if one person is having a particular problem others have or
> will have it, too. A searchable archive of answers (like a mailing list
> archive) is far more valuable than the epheme
On 09/07/2012 06:57 AM, Marco Patzer wrote:
At the moment the channel is dead, which is probably due to the fact
that no one knows of its existence. But it might turn into a
valuable source of information, e.g. regarding installation problems
for which the mailing list might not be as suitable.
Marco wrote:
> I was wandering if we should promote the ConTeXt
> IRC channel on the contextgarden home page,
The purpose of a link on the front page would be to point
help-searchers at a useful resource --- if the resource is not yet
useful, there's no point in the link, I think. After all, peopl
I'm certainly in #context regularly, although I agree that it does appear
dead most of the time. I would like to see it as active as #latex.
Troy
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an en
Hi,
I was wandering if we should promote the ConTeXt IRC channel on the
contextgarden home page, e.g. underneath “Welcome to ConTeXt garden”
or “External Help”. The current page
(http://wiki.contextgarden.net/IRC) is unlikely to be found by
anyone.
I think most questions should stay on the mailin
12 matches
Mail list logo
