Re: [NTG-context] Re: texexec 4.0 to 5.0 update.

2004-10-24 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
Am 24.10.2004 um 10:27 schrieb Patrick Gundlach: what do you mean that your fonts are not embedded in your PDF file? Does ConTeXt find the fonts? Are they just not included in the PDF file? Then it is a problem with your map files. Does it occur with all your fonts? Please try to be a bit more

RE: [NTG-context] Re: texexec 4.0 to 5.0 update.

2004-10-24 Thread Dirar BOUGATEF
Thanks to you all for your answers. I have just finished from reinsatalling Context as i kept a backup of my Texlive tree before my first installation. This time i avoided to do things manually and i have unzipped my files directly to the texmf folder as it is supposed to be done. Everything works

Re: [NTG-context] Re: texexec 4.0 to 5.0 update.

2004-10-24 Thread h h extern
Dirar BOUGATEF wrote: OK. I'll try another time. Please don't take it on me, this macrosoft magic ;=) ConTeXt ver: 2003.9.25 fmt: 2004.8.17 int: english mes: english ^ I have applyed a texhash too but no result. How about: texexec --make --all you

Re: [NTG-context] Re: texexec 4.0 to 5.0 update.

2004-10-24 Thread h h extern
Dirar BOUGATEF wrote: texexec --make en solves the problem. But now my fonts are not embeded to my PDF document as it was with the previous version. I think the way i installed the new archive wasn't fair ? What's the best way to do it ? take a look at cont-sys.rme: maybe you need to enable

Re: [NTG-context] Re: texexec 4.0 to 5.0 update.

2004-10-24 Thread h h extern
Dirar BOUGATEF wrote: What is the folder script in cont-tmf ? I had to copy manually the texexec.pl from this folder to my bin folder to update texexec with the 5.0 version. Should not that have been done when i unzipped every thing or is it done on purpose (To me it looks like the peltk folder

[NTG-context] Re: texexec 4.0 to 5.0 update.

2004-10-22 Thread Patrick Gundlach
Hello Dirar, your message is still completely unreadable, see: http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20041022.185441.3949557f.html Your texexec finds an old version of ConTeXt (2003.9.25). How did you install the new ConTeXt? Make sure you run texhash (or mktexlsr) to update the database of

RE: [NTG-context] Re: texexec 4.0 to 5.0 update.

2004-10-22 Thread Dirar BOUGATEF
OK. I'll try another time. Please don't take it on me, this macrosoft magic ;=) This is what i get : TeXExec 5.0 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2004 executable : pdfetex format : cont-en inputfile : TEST output : standard interface : en current mode : none TeX run : 1 This is pdfeTeXk, Version

RE: [NTG-context] Re: texexec 4.0 to 5.0 update.

2004-10-22 Thread Dirar BOUGATEF
texexec --make en solves the problem. But now my fonts are not embeded to my PDF document as it was with the previous version. I think the way i installed the new archive wasn't fair ? What's the best way to do it ?Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! MSN Messenger Download today it's

[NTG-context] Re: texexec changes drives

2003-12-21 Thread Patrick Gundlach
David, That was probably me, but I never got an answer. Oh sorry. So I did remember something, but missed the end of the discussion. I am of no help here. Patrick -- mon transistor j'adore ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[NTG-context] Re: texexec changes drives

2003-12-20 Thread Patrick Gundlach
Hi David, Has anyone else experienced this strange behavior of changing drives? iirc this was on the list two months ago. Patrick -- mon transistor j'adore ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [NTG-context] Re: texexec changes drives

2003-12-20 Thread David Arnold
Patrick, That was probably me, but I never got an answer. I just tried searching, but couldn't find anything. At 08:21 PM 12/20/03 +0100, you wrote: Hi David, Has anyone else experienced this strange behavior of changing drives? iirc this was on the list two months ago. Patrick -- mon

Re: [NTG-context] Re: texexec page selection changes output?

2003-12-15 Thread Hans Hagen
At 15:43 14/12/2003, Patrick Gundlach wrote: Hello out there I recently used texexec to select a given page from a file (attached) of three pages: texexec --pdfselect --selection=2 --result=cover2-tx.pdf covers.pdf When I try to do the above, ConTeXt looks for a font aicmti10. What is going

[NTG-context] Re: texexec page selection changes output?

2003-12-14 Thread Patrick Gundlach
Hello out there I recently used texexec to select a given page from a file (attached) of three pages: texexec --pdfselect --selection=2 --result=cover2-tx.pdf covers.pdf When I try to do the above, ConTeXt looks for a font aicmti10. What is going on here? Something misconfigured? This is

Re: [NTG-context] Re: Texexec

2003-07-07 Thread Hans Hagen
At 18:39 04/07/2003 -0500, Marshall Ward wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ texexec --pdfarrange --paper=letter*letter --print=2up --result=out.pdf testcert10.pdf testcert11.pdf ### Output attached as out.log ### # RESILT FILE INFO # [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ pdfinfo out.pdf Creator: TeX

[NTG-context] Re: Texexec

2003-07-02 Thread Hans Hagen
At 23:01 01/07/2003 -0500, you wrote: I'm trying to combine multiple PDF files. When I run texexec --pdfarrange *.pdf it works fine except for one thing: the input is in letter format and the output appears to be in A4. A little bit of the right side gets cut off. I've tried --mode=letter and