looks nice.
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
In the same way as Hans wrote them in his exmple.
Cool, but will it be included in context source? Or it is too early?
I think that such solutions are too fragile. A robust way will be to use
a complete m
Am 12.03.2009 um 21:06 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
Cool, but will it be included in context source? Or it is too early?
I think that such solutions are too fragile. A robust way will be to
use a complete mediawiki (or any other markup) parser. It one in lua
is available, integrating it to Con
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
In the same way as Hans wrote them in his exmple.
Cool, but will it be included in context source? Or it is too early?
I think that such solutions are too fragile. A robust way will be to use a
complete mediawiki (or any other markup) parse
In the same way as Hans wrote them in his exmple.
Cool, but will it be included in context source? Or it is too early?
Best,
Vyatcheslav
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to
Am 12.03.2009 um 18:14 schrieb Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky:
Hello Hraban,
Simplified table syntax is much appreciated! Thank you for http://wiki.contextgarden.net/wikitable
.
However, I cannot understand how to use it. :)
In the same way as Hans wrote them in his exmple.
\startluacode
functio
Hello Hraban,
Simplified table syntax is much appreciated! Thank you for
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/wikitable.
However, I cannot understand how to use it. :)
Best,
Vyatcheslav
___
If your question is of interes
Thank you for the two new table syntaxes!
I wikified them:
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/wikitable
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/TABLE#TABLEs_with_old_table_syntax
Greetlings from Lake Constance!
Hraban
---
http://www.fiee.net/texnique/
http://wiki.contextgarden.net
https://www.cacert.org (I'm a
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:10 PM, John Devereux wrote:
> [...]
> I find that writing documents for context - once you get used to it -
> is much nicer than using a wordprocessor.
>
> But the process of entering tables remains tedious and error prone,
> compared to e.g. the Word equivalent that many
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 19:03, John Devereux wrote:
> Hans Hagen writes:
>
>
> [...]
>
> Hi Hans,
>
> Is there any possible way to use the wiki-style tables like:
>
> ^ Heading 1 ^ Heading 2 ^
> | Item 1 | Item 2 |
> | Item 3 | Item 4 |
>
> (Probably with some wrapper)
>
> Perhaps this boils
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
\long\def\dododoTABLENC#1\NC
{\ifconditional\inTABLEnc\else\settrue\inTABLEnc\parseTR[][]\fi
\dodoubleempty\parseTD#1\eTD\NC}
I want to be able to give argument with \NC too, it's important for me
to be able to use spanned columns/rows in the simple form.
i had tha
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 8 Mar 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Hans,
>>>
>>> natural tables are perfect to create tables with a fixed size for the
>>> cells but the syntax requires sometimes a lot of typing for small content
Hans Hagen writes:
> John Devereux wrote:
>> Hans Hagen writes:
>>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> Is there any possible way to use the wiki-style tables like:
>>
>> ^ Heading 1 ^ Heading 2 ^
>> | Item 1| Item 2 |
>> | Item 3| Item 4 |
>>
>> (Probably with some wrapper)
>>
>> Perhaps th
John Devereux wrote:
Hans Hagen writes:
[...]
Hi Hans,
Is there any possible way to use the wiki-style tables like:
^ Heading 1 ^ Heading 2 ^
| Item 1| Item 2 |
| Item 3| Item 4 |
(Probably with some wrapper)
Perhaps this boils down to asking if it is possible to (re)define
"speci
Hans Hagen writes:
[...]
Hi Hans,
Is there any possible way to use the wiki-style tables like:
^ Heading 1 ^ Heading 2 ^
| Item 1| Item 2 |
| Item 3| Item 4 |
(Probably with some wrapper)
Perhaps this boils down to asking if it is possible to (re)define
"special" characters, within
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Hi Hans,
natural tables are perfect to create tables with a fixed size for the
cells
but the syntax requires sometimes a lot of typing for small content
and takes
to many lines of code in the document.
less code and more e
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Hi Hans,
natural tables are perfect to create tables with a fixed size for the cells
but the syntax requires sometimes a lot of typing for small content and takes
to many lines of code in the document.
I wrote a while ago a simple wrapper to use a t
Hi Hans,
natural tables are perfect to create tables with a fixed size for the
cells
but the syntax requires sometimes a lot of typing for small content
and takes
to many lines of code in the document.
I wrote a while ago a simple wrapper to use a table/tabulate like syntax
for the input, w
17 matches
Mail list logo
