>= Original Message From Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> =
>ishamid wrote:
>
>> lines all over the place in my work that compiled fine with the old ConTeX,
>> and I suspect that XeTeX may be responsible. Is there a way to completely
>> isolate the new stuff because I'm going to lose a lot of
Hi Hans,
>= Original Message From Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> =
>at the moment the best way of dealing with is is to use texexec's engine
handler;
>
>locate texexec.ini (or rme) and set
>
>set UseEnginePath to true
>
>after that pdfetex, aleph, xetex, mpost etc will end up on their own
ishamid wrote:
Ok, the new supp-dir.tex helps. But there is another problem. Now my following
macros are messed up (used in our private ar-cont.tex)
one reason more for a layer of abstraction -)
\let\beginRL=\leavevmode\startarabictext
\let\beginRL=\startarabictext
or:
\def\beginRL{\dontleavehmode
ishamid wrote:
This has been a really frustrating week...
sorry for that
i played a it with the $engine stuff in web2c and (as adam already found out for
xetex) somehow that mechanism does not work well [one can set en engine in
texmf.cnf, like
TEXFORMATS= .;$TEXMF/web2c/{$engine,}
MFBASES
ishamid wrote:
lines all over the place in my work that compiled fine with the old ConTeX,
and I suspect that XeTeX may be responsible. Is there a way to completely
isolate the new stuff because I'm going to lose a lot of time trying to track
down every situation where my previously well-behaved
>= Original Message From Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> =
>> Sounds like supp-dir needs a no-Omega check, as well. Hans?
>
>attached for testing, i dunny what the pardir equivalents are for \beginL and
>\beginR -)
Not to belabor this, but I'm getting
### simple group (level 1) entered at
>= Original Message From Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> =
>> Sounds like supp-dir needs a no-Omega check, as well. Hans?
>
>attached for testing, i dunny what the pardir equivalents are for \beginL and
>\beginR -)
Ok, the new supp-dir.tex helps. But there is another problem. Now my followi
Adam Lindsay wrote:
ishamid said this at Tue, 22 Mar 2005 18:30:48 -0700:
! Undefined control sequence.
\pardir #1#2#3->\global \TeXXeTstate
\plusone \if #2L\chardef
\inlinedirecti...
l.1 \pardir TLT
Oops, I think I recognize this.
This came about when Hans and
ishamid said this at Tue, 22 Mar 2005 18:30:48 -0700:
>! Undefined control sequence.
>\pardir #1#2#3->\global \TeXXeTstate
> \plusone \if #2L\chardef
>\inlinedirecti...
>l.1 \pardir TLT
Oops, I think I recognize this.
This came about when Hans and I were tryin
