On 01/08/2014 08:17 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
> On 01/08/2014 05:11 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>> [...]
>> Which version do you expect? There won't be any updates to this
>> unless/until Taco or Luigi release a new one.
>
> I expected version 0.78.1, since version 0.78.0 seems not to be able to
>
On 01/08/2014 05:11 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Jan 8, 2014 5:02 PM, "Pablo Rodriguez" wrote:
>> On 01/07/2014 08:36 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>> > [...]
>> >
>> > Please try again. (Or at least I hope that the new binary has
>> > proliferated to the distribution already.)
>>
>> Mojca,
>>
>> jus
On Jan 8, 2014 5:02 PM, "Pablo Rodriguez" wrote:
>
> On 01/07/2014 08:36 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > Please try again. (Or at least I hope that the new binary has
> > proliferated to the distribution already.)
>
> Mojca,
>
> just now the ConTeXt Suite still downloads version 0.78.0
On 01/07/2014 08:36 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> [...]
>
> Please try again. (Or at least I hope that the new binary has
> proliferated to the distribution already.)
Mojca,
just now the ConTeXt Suite still downloads version 0.78.0 for Linux
32-bit ("This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.78.0-2014010116 (
On 01/07/2014 10:14 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 1/7/2014 9:58 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> [...]
>> Many thanks for your help, Mojca.
>>
>> I tried and it seems that I still have the issue.
>>
>> I will check tomorrow again.
>
> or move to 64 bit linux (makes normal luatex faster too)
My processo
On 1/7/2014 9:58 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 01/07/2014 08:36 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
[...]
Please try again. (Or at least I hope that the new binary has
proliferated to the distribution already.)
Many thanks for your help, Mojca.
I tried and it seems that I still have the issue.
I will
On 01/07/2014 08:36 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> [...]
> Please try again. (Or at least I hope that the new binary has
> proliferated to the distribution already.)
Many thanks for your help, Mojca.
I tried and it seems that I still have the issue.
I will check tomorrow again.
Pablo
--
http://w
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 8:49 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 1/7/2014 8:06 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>
>> I guess the version mismatch might cause the issue.
>
>
> A mismatch between ... and ... ?
He was using luajittex 0.77.0 which is apparently too old already.
Mojca
On 1/7/2014 8:06 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
I guess the version mismatch might cause the issue.
A mismatch between ... and ... ?
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 |
On 1/7/2014 8:04 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 01/07/2014 07:17 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 1/7/2014 7:07 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
I have just updated the ConTeXt Suite (for Linux) and luajittex seems to
be broken. When removing tex/texmf-cache/luatex-cache, context isn’t
able to recreate it.
I
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
> On 01/07/2014 07:24 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>>> On 01/06/2014 10:38 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 1/6/2014 9:29 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
> [...]
> Which one is preferable:
On 01/07/2014 07:17 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 1/7/2014 7:07 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> I have just updated the ConTeXt Suite (for Linux) and luajittex seems to
>> be broken. When removing tex/texmf-cache/luatex-cache, context isn’t
>> able to recreate it.
>>
>> If I try to recreate it manually
On 01/07/2014 07:24 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> On 01/06/2014 10:38 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>> On 1/6/2014 9:29 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
[...]
Which one is preferable: luatex or luajittex?
>>>
>>> both should work although at some
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
> On 01/06/2014 10:38 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>> On 1/6/2014 9:29 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> Which one is preferable: luatex or luajittex?
>>
>> both should work although at some point we will move on to > 0.77
>> specific functiona
On 1/7/2014 7:07 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 01/06/2014 10:38 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 1/6/2014 9:29 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
[...]
Which one is preferable: luatex or luajittex?
both should work although at some point we will move on to > 0.77
specific functionality
there will be a luaji
On 01/06/2014 10:38 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 1/6/2014 9:29 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> [...]
>> Which one is preferable: luatex or luajittex?
>
> both should work although at some point we will move on to > 0.77
> specific functionality
>
> there will be a luajittex 0.78.1 soon (there is alr
On 1/6/2014 9:29 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
Dear list,
first of all, best wishes to all for the new year 2014.
I have just updated the ConTeXt Suite and I discovered that the latest
luatex version is newer than the luajittex version (0.78.0 vs. 0.77.0).
Which one is preferable: luatex or luaji
Dear list,
first of all, best wishes to all for the new year 2014.
I have just updated the ConTeXt Suite and I discovered that the latest
luatex version is newer than the luajittex version (0.78.0 vs. 0.77.0).
Which one is preferable: luatex or luajittex?
Many thanks for your help,
Pablo
--
18 matches
Mail list logo