On 12/24/07, Aditya Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007, Gour wrote:
>
> > 5) I read LaTeX in proper ConTeXt pdf, but I'm interested is there some
> > helper to convert classical LaTeX book (book class) to ConTeXt? I've two
> > books which I'm considering to publish as one (~100
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007, Gour wrote:
> 5) I read LaTeX in proper ConTeXt pdf, but I'm interested is there some
> helper to convert classical LaTeX book (book class) to ConTeXt? I've two
> books which I'm considering to publish as one (~1000p) in the future, so
> any help in conversion would be nice
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 07:43:35 +0100
Gour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 08:39:56 -0700
> "Idris Samawi Hamid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Which is why we need a team :-)
>
> Right. This sounds as reasonable proposal - let every expert writes his/her
> part.
We're too les
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 09:29:26 +0100
Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yes and no ... luatex's interfaces may change, as may some
> functionality (much starts as experiment, is tested, evolves, is
> optimized, etc);
That's understandable, nothing to complain about.
> however, as long as you
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 23:43:35 -0700, Gour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 08:39:56 -0700
> "Idris Samawi Hamid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Which is why we need a team :-)
>
> Right. This sounds as reasonable proposal - let every expert writes
> his/her part.
>
>> Anyway, as
Gour wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 08:39:56 -0700
> "Idris Samawi Hamid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Which is why we need a team :-)
>
> Right. This sounds as reasonable proposal - let every expert writes his/her
> part.
>
>> Anyway, as soon as luatex/mkiv is relatively stable, the hyperbo
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 08:39:56 -0700
"Idris Samawi Hamid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which is why we need a team :-)
Right. This sounds as reasonable proposal - let every expert writes his/her
part.
> Anyway, as soon as luatex/mkiv is relatively stable, the hyperbola is still
> a bit too far
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 13:57:03 +0100
Wolfgang Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You should use XeTeX or LuaTeX and you're free from any problem
> because đ is now a normal letter as any other character and you could
> use all letters in label texts without problems.
Good. I plan to use LuaTeX i
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 05:57:03 -0700, Wolfgang Schuster
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The ConTeXt manual, very difficult topic. All of us want it, nobody is
> able or motivated enough to write, we have a few experts for every
> topic (mathematics, fonts etc.) but none who who has knowledge about
>
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 22:11:49 +0100
Gour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 21:09:49 +0100
> "Mojca Miklavec" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > (We'll drop that letter from our keyboards soon :)
> > >
> > > Oh, then I'll stay with friendly lyx/latex...
> >
> > What does lyx have
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 21:09:49 +0100
"Mojca Miklavec" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > (We'll drop that letter from our keyboards soon :)
> >
> > Oh, then I'll stay with friendly lyx/latex...
>
> What does lyx have to do with đ and the (Slovenian) keyboard?
Ahh, I understood you will start a party
On Dec 22, 2007 3:19 PM, Gour wrote:
>
> > (We'll drop that letter from our keyboards soon :)
>
> Oh, then I'll stay with friendly lyx/latex...
What does lyx have to do with đ and the (Slovenian) keyboard?
> > That was before anyone started complaining about its
> > non-functionality :).
>
> When
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 14:33:12 +0100
"Mojca Miklavec" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, except that there is no beamer package available in ConTeXt , but
> theoretically "anything can be done".
Sure ;)
>
> In addition to the core functionality:
> http://modules.contextgarden.net/taspresent
> http
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 12:00:48 +0100
Jean Magnan de Bornier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
Thanks.
> AucTeX support for ConTeXt is quite good, but I fear that a
> preview-latex equivalent is out of reach now (although is has been
> announced a while back).
I explored mailing-archives a bit, but
On Dec 22, 2007 11:01 AM, Gour wrote:
> My writing needs are from short & simple docs (1--few pages long) over
> preparing
> educational presentations (with handouts) illustrated with graphics (both
> images & SVG) for
> seminars (beamer-like) to be used with video-projector in classroom-like
>
Le 22 décembre à 11:01:22 Gour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrit notamment:
| My writing needs are from short & simple docs (1--few pages long) over
preparing
| educational presentations (with handouts) illustrated with graphics (both
images & SVG) for
| seminars (beamer-like) to be used with video-proj
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 10:13:31 +0100
"luigi scarso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hmm...boh.
:-)
> It depends:
> I prefear one email for each question plus an example to test;
OK. Will remember for the future...
> but maybe your questions are easy, so it's better one email .
> (BTW, it's not easy
> Have several questions, so before firing them up, I'd like to ask about
> general etiquette on the list: should I throw them all in one email or
> divide as one_question/email ?
hmm...boh.
It depends:
I prefear one email for each question plus an example to test;
but maybe your questions are ea
Hi!
Recently I switched to emacs editor and at considered to leave lyx.
At the same time, I'm again considering ConTeXt (was playing with it some
years ago when it was receiving utf-8 support) - after reading about
luaTeX & MkIV development.
Have several questions, so before firing them up, I'd
19 matches
Mail list logo
