RE: Had this, then lost it - blog about multiple Outlook sessions

-Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 1 April 2008 3:01 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Had this, then lost it - blog about multiple Outlook sessions >> Windows source is probably more accessible thanks to antitrust actions. > > The Windo

The Unlimited Home Site License (April Fools???)

I wish you hadn't published this today.  I don't know whether to believe it or not. --- Included Stuff Follows --- Tuesday, April 01, 2008 A new licensing model for home software: The Unlimited Home Site License http://sunbeltblog.blogspot.com/2008/04/new-li

Re: Alternative to Network Solutions?

On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 21:53 -0600, Jim McAtee wrote: > Either eNom or Tucows (OpenSRS), either one of them through one of their > resellers. Tucows is probably the best for protecting their customers' > rights, while GoDaddy is the worst in that regard. What have yous seen godaddy do? jlc ~ Up

Re: Alternative to Network Solutions?

Either eNom or Tucows (OpenSRS), either one of them through one of their resellers. Tucows is probably the best for protecting their customers' rights, while GoDaddy is the worst in that regard. http://www.p2pnet.net/story/11147 http://www.threadwatch.org/node/12636 If you're registering a l

Re: SmartPhone

On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Sam Cayze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm guessing that theives that are knowledgable will be more inclined to > steal phones that they know can't be disabled... Again, GSM phones can be disabled as easily as CDMA phones. The idea that GSM phones are not tracea

Re: SmartPhone

On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Vulnerable to what though? As if your gonna get your phone back anyhow? Well, I guess the theory is, if there is no way a phone can be used once it is reported stolen, they are less likely to be stolen. I suspect

Re: Alternative to Network Solutions?

On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Ajay Kulsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At this time, most of our clients have their domain registered and DNS > servers kept at Network Solutions. You have my sympathies. > Any other companies with which you have had good experience? I've been using Domain

RE: Alternative to Network Solutions?

Godaddy for me. Their dns interface is pretty good and does support spf for 9 bucks/yr/domain. -Original Message- From: Ajay Kulsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 10:19 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Alternative to Network Solutions? Hi folks, At this tim

Alternative to Network Solutions?

Hi folks, At this time, most of our clients have their domain registered and DNS servers kept at Network Solutions. However, we are finding their charges high and services minimal. For example, they do not support creation of SPF records -- and tech-support refuses to send us an email stating

RE: [OT] April 1st

There are others out there, this is not the only one. From: Christopher J. Bosak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 8:12 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT] April 1st 4/14 is when they should have more. -Original M

RE: SmartPhone

I'm guessing that theives that are knowledgable will be more inclined to steal phones that they know can't be disabled... -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 7:00 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: SmartPhone Vulne

Re: SmartPhone

Vulnerable to what though? As if your gonna get your phone back anyhow? On 4/1/08, Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Some technical background: > > CDMA = Popular term for the mobile phone standard Verizon and Sprint use > GSM = Popular term for the mobile phone standard AT&T and most othe

RE: Had this, then lost it - blog about multiple Outlook sessions

I can't seem to get it to accept the /profile switch. Does this work for you? -Original Message- From: Greg Mulholland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 6:13 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Had this, then lost it - blog about multiple Outlook sessions Th

RE: Public TS - opinions?

Found the link: http://technet2.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/library/bbdfce7c-fdc3-41c 0-8e7d-0e03ad1403e31033.mspx?mfr=true Webster From: Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 5:42 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Public TS - opinions?

RE: Public TS - opinions?

From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Public TS - opinions? TS gateway requires NAP? I didn't hear that at TechED last year when they was going over TS gateway.. You got some documentation that says that Webster, Id love to have another read before I go to well testing

RE: Public TS - opinions?

Yes, the work I am doing is "on the side" work for a small 8 user network. Money is an issue, so I have to work with what they have. They need TS support to a couple external users for non-domain PC access. I hesitate at VPN because the external PCs are out of my control and could potentially ca

RE: Public TS - opinions?

>From memory it does give you the ability to create a nap policy so what >webster says i believe to be true. I dont have nap but it did ask me to create >some such. From: Ziots, Edward [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 2 April 2008 9:28 AM To: NT System Admin

RE: Public TS - opinions?

TS gateway requires NAP? I didn't hear that at TechED last year when they was going over TS gateway.. You got some documentation that says that Webster, Id love to have another read before I go to well testing. Z Edward E. Ziots Network Engineer Lifespan Organization MCSE,MCSA,MCP,S

RE: dns add entry script

I think dnscmd.exe from the Win2k3 resource kit is what you are looking for. Z sage: DnsCmd [] ServerName>: . -- local machine using LPC IP address -- RPC over TCP/IP DNS name -- RPC over TCP/IP other server name -- RPC o

Re: Had this, then lost it - blog about multiple Outlook sessions

Ya know - I searched that database, and I didn't find MAPI in there. Did you see it? On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Michael B. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As of last month, all of the protocols are public. Now, I guess, Microsoft > does have to compete on the merits, eh what? > > > Regar

RE: SmartPhone

Talk about Hijacking a thread. To address the original posters actual question which was "what type of smartphone should I buy?" IMHO: I've been a Palm advocate for the longest time so I'd start with the Treo 750 running Windows Mobile 6. Almost everything new coming down the pipe is an I-Phone

RE: Public TS - opinions?

If you want to get silly you could always use certificates with RDP, but why the hassle. Z Edward E. Ziots Network Engineer Lifespan Organization MCSE,MCSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA Phone: 401-639-3505 -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 0

RE: Public TS - opinions?

I would hope there are some smart people on this list that are doing that. Z Edward E. Ziots Network Engineer Lifespan Organization MCSE,MCSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA Phone: 401-639-3505 -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 5:55 P

Re: Had this, then lost it - blog about multiple Outlook sessions

On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Michael B. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As of last month, all of the protocols are public. Microsoft's done this before. It has always, without any exception I know of, proven out to be not as sunny as the press release suggests. Either the documentation i

RE: Had this, then lost it - blog about multiple Outlook sessions

This tool has been modified a few times. It has now been tested on XP, O2003, Vista, 2007 and combinations of both. I have been using it daily for quite a while now. Greg From: Ken Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 2 April 2008 5:28 AM To: NT Sy

RE: Had this, then lost it - blog about multiple Outlook sessions

As of last month, all of the protocols are public. Now, I guess, Microsoft does have to compete on the merits, eh what? Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008

RE: Public TS - opinions?

Ben I agree with you about where the weakness lies. Let me say its forums like this where we gain the most benefit from those that have vast experience and we are able to flesh out these issues. It's a privilege to be a part of this group. I understand the encryption part of things. Encryption

Re: Had this, then lost it - blog about multiple Outlook sessions

On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Carl Houseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you could get source to Exchange and it fell into the wrong hands, those > hands could be even better than they are now at writing Exchange-compatible > servers that run under Linux ... And then Microsoft might have to

Re: SmartPhone

Some technical background: CDMA = Popular term for the mobile phone standard Verizon and Sprint use GSM = Popular term for the mobile phone standard AT&T and most other carriers use ESN = Electronic Serial Number. Unique hardware ID for a CDMA phone/device. IMEI = International Mobile Equipment

RE: SmartPhone

"The difference is, you can't take the SIM out of your dead Verizon phone and put it in a working phone to get back on the air." Actually, you can with a small hex screwdriver :) Great if you get phones on ebay for spare parts, and the ESN's are 'Dirty' or bad. -Sam The list smartass. -Or

Re: Public TS - opinions?

Indeed. But only smart people do that... On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Ken Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But without a username, TSGrinder isn't going to get you anywhere. The > builtin Administrator account could be renamed to avoid attack against a well > known account. > > Cheers >

RE: Public TS - opinions?

Tell that to Tim...:) S -Original Message- From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 6:19 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Public TS - opinions? But without a username, TSGrinder isn't going to get you anywhere. The builtin Administrator accoun

Re: SmartPhone

On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Rod Trent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Lack of SIM compatibility has been the only obstacle for me to use Verizon. > > Verizon suggests that it's a security measure. They lie. It hasn't been an issue for the rest of the world. What is Verizon doing wrong that

Re: Public TS - opinions?

On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:09 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't RDP 128 bit encrypted ... Gah. Encryption isn't like horsepower. Comparing key sizes doesn't tell you how secure something is. And you can't make something secure just by sprinkling a little cryp

dns add entry script

Hi, I've googled around but I can't find any script to add DNS entries in my AD DNS server remotely. Anyone know any tool? I know dnscmd.exe in the server side, but any way to do it remotely? Do I have to install the any Resource kit in my Windows XP or Vista machine? Thanks, Miguel

RE: Public TS - opinions?

That would be great, but refer to the "but with those people who yes they exist that will not spend dollars on extra equipment; is this not good enough?" Buying the licensing for 2008 for those that already have 2003, requires $$$ if it's a new scenario and if dollars are available then here w

RE: Public TS - opinions?

But without a username, TSGrinder isn't going to get you anywhere. The builtin Administrator account could be renamed to avoid attack against a well known account. Cheers Ken -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 1 April 2008 2:03 PM To: NT System A

RE: Public TS - opinions?

What about Server 2008 Terminal Services with TS Gateway? TS Gateway REQUIRES NAP and will install a local NAP if it doesn't see NAP on the network. Webster From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Public TS - opinions? Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't RDP

RE: Public TS - opinions?

Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't RDP 128 bit encrypted, so what the main diff between that an hosting OWA or such. Either you are worried about 1. The ability to find a RDP hack which allows escalation 2. DOS on the server 3. You are worried about getting information breac

FW: Mac Got Hack in 2 min

Source: http://www.desktoplinux.com/news/NS2702127176.html From: Za Vue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 5:04 PM To: 'NT System Admin Issues' Subject: Mac Got Hack in 2 min Mar. 31, 2008 Blog: The Mac went down in two minutes. The Vista SP1 PC made it two days. Only t

Mac Got Hack in 2 min

Mar. 31, 2008 Blog: The Mac went down in two minutes. The Vista SP1 PC made it two days. Only the Sony VAIO VGN-TZ37CN laptop running Ubuntu 7.10 survived the CanSecWest PWN to OWN PC hacking contest. The rules were simple. Hackers had to "read the contents of a designated file on each system thr

Re: Public TS - opinions?

google for TSGRINDER On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Steve Ens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've actually never heard of anyone hacking in via RDP...maybe I'm wrong. > Here's a good article about securing an open Terminal Server. > http://support.microsoft.com/?id=895433 > > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2

Re: Public TS - opinions?

SSL-Explorer - it even runs on Windows. On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I have a client that wants to keep a terminal server available publicly to > be accessed from multiple sites where a VPN is not possible due to money and > equipment constraints.

Re: Core Configurator

http://www.tomshardware.com/2008/03/11/windows_server_2008_core_installation/page14.html On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Steve Ens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just read an article on Tom's Hardwarethere isn't much memory > savings, but lots of disk space savings. Also probably reduced pat

Re: Core Configurator

I just read an article on Tom's Hardwarethere isn't much memory savings, but lots of disk space savings. Also probably reduced patching involved over time which would result in less downtime on the virtual machines if you're running hyper-v. On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Jacob <[EMAIL PROTE

RE: Public TS - opinions?

Our firewall (and many others) can detect port scans and IP range scans and blacklist that IP for a set amount of time, so I wasn't overly concerned about that, but it's a good tip. "Sam Cayze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 04/01/2008 04:50 PM Please respond to "NT System Admin Issues" To "NT Syst

Re: Public TS - opinions?

I've actually never heard of anyone hacking in via RDP...maybe I'm wrong. Here's a good article about securing an open Terminal Server. http://support.microsoft.com/?id=895433 On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:48 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Never said no firewall in front of it -- we were only NA

RE: Public TS - opinions?

That is not really the case. The only port is 3389. It is behind a firewall, just has 3389 NAT'd. Bob Fronk > -Original Message- > From: Charlie Kaiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 4:39 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Public TS - opinions? >

RE: Core Configurator

I fired it up in a VM. I think that it has its place in "big shops", not so much for us "little and medium guys" (which may not apply to you - but does to me and my clients). The lack of .NET framework and PowerShell make it a little tough to manage (although WinRM works just fine as do any rem

RE: Public TS - opinions?

At list change the port! Everybody's scanning port 3389 for open connections. Combine this with other measures, like whitelisting, and preferable SSL. From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 3:43 PM To: NT System Admin Issues

RE: Public TS - opinions?

Never said no firewall in front of it -- we were only NATing a single port (3389) to that box, and RDP is 128-bit encrypted. Not saying it's a good idea, but for a short stint and some IP whitelisting it wasn't the end of the world either... "Ziots, Edward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 04/01/2008 0

RE: Public TS - opinions?

Hamachi maybe? I use it to RDP to our leased web server. Works pretty well, beats paying the $75/mo VPN fee the host would charge otherwise.  - Andy O. From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 3:35 PM To: NT System Admin Is

RE: Public TS - opinions?

The few times we've had to do it we whitelisted the IPs on the firewall that we wanted to allow connections from. If the connecting IP was on a whitelist we'd NAT to the internal IP on port 3389 and the user would be in. We had three users that needed access this way, so we whitelisted their home o

RE: Microsoft Hyper-V

ObDisclaimer: I'm not a patching guru. I was under the impression that, whether you needed a patch or not, if it was for your architecture, it would get downloaded and put into I386 (or someplace similar) in case you ever activated the roles/features on your server that might require that patch

RE: Public TS - opinions?

As long as that TS is not connected to the rest of your network and contains no sensitive material, it's fine. LOL... Otherwise, may as well give all your servers publicly accessible IP addresses... Even a free MS VPN, where the client will run on any MS desktop, will provide significantly bett

RE: Public TS - opinions?

I think you can also setup a TS gateway system that the user connects to via https and it tunnels or passes the rdp traffic to the terminal server. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 4:39 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Public TS - opinio

RE: Core Configurator

So.. has anybody played with server core in 2008? Thoughts? From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 12:02 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Core Configurator Found this tool today...tested it and works great. http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/files/folder

Re: Public TS - opinions?

The few times we've had to do it we whitelisted the IPs on the firewall that we wanted to allow connections from. If the connecting IP was on a whitelist we'd NAT to the internal IP on port 3389 and the user would be in. We had three users that needed access this way, so we whitelisted their ho

Public TS - opinions?

I have a client that wants to keep a terminal server available publicly to be accessed from multiple sites where a VPN is not possible due to money and equipment constraints. The outside users just use the Remote Desktop and connect directly to the public IP. I feel this is a security risk.

RE: Microsoft Hyper-V

The bare metal thing would be cool since both ESX and Virtual Iron have that capability already. as far as patching goes obviously on server core the service footprint would be much smaller and would generally speaking require less patching. The pricing/licensing structure is also attractive, n

Re: [OT] NT definition?

uh one, uh tahooo, uh three. On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Mike Gill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The world may never know. :) -- ME2 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ ~

RE: Had this, then lost it - blog about multiple Outlook sessions

It would probably avoid the event 32's but I doubt that Desktop Search would know which profile to reference any better than before. Desktop Search could care less whether the mail store is online or cached, don't you think? From: Malcolm Reitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 0

RE: Had this, then lost it - blog about multiple Outlook sessions

Perhaps the way to go would be to run your main profile in cached mode and the other profiles in non-cached mode. That should keep Desktop Search happy. Malcolm From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 01 April, 2008 13:54 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Had this,

RE: Had this, then lost it - blog about multiple Outlook sessions

One Caveat. If you have a program that automatically sends emails (like our accounting package) you have to be careful which Outlook is "active" as the wrong account can be selected for sending the email. However, to be able to have multiple inboxes open in Outlook and not via Web is a wonderful

RE: SmartPhone

Rickshaws are really not to be found in Shanghai anymore! Murray From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 2:40 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SmartPhone Beijing is cracking down on the motor rickshaws due to th

RE: SmartPhone

Correct, SIM cards CAN be disabled and flagged as stolen just like ESN's can be on CDMA networks. -Original Message- From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 2:38 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SmartPhone My wife's cell was stolen last year

RE: SmartPhone

Beijing is cracking down on the motor rickshaws due to the Olympics. In Kunming, too. I watched a traffic cop yank a rickshaw driver down into traffic using a long pole with a hook on it. From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 3:34 PM To: NT System

RE: SmartPhone

Oops: Tat = At&t -Original Message- From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 2:37 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SmartPhone consumerist.com has a rap list for every company. It's not like Tat is an angel or anything... I, on a personal level,

RE: SmartPhone

My wife's cell was stolen last year with a sim card and once we called in to AT&T, they shut it off immediately. Of course, the phone could be used with another sim card, but as long as it isn't ours, we don not care! Murray -Original Message- From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SmartPhone

consumerist.com has a rap list for every company. It's not like Tat is an angel or anything... I, on a personal level, refuse to do business with them for these non-phone related issues: Business decisions, leadership, ethics, wasteful spending, being a slut to the NSA, privacy rights, etc... -

RE: SmartPhone

My son has three phones too. One is a Blackberry for use in China, one is for use in Australia and the third is for use in America. MMF -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 1:33 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re:

RE: Had this, then lost it - blog about multiple Outlook sessions

Yeah, but I could see the mapi32.dll source, which would be very helpful. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 2:35 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Had this, t

RE: SmartPhone

Well, I can tell you about driving. First, most of the vehicles of conveyance in China have 2 wheels. But seriously, there are a lot of cars. You need a Chinese Driver's License to drive in China, and the written test is in Chinese. My son has a driver and a van, so I never have need to drive. My d

Re: Core Configurator

Ouch...sorry, took the kids to Grand Forks yesterday...spring break. On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Ken Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, but it was posted on this list yesterday :-) > > > > Cheers > > Ken > > > > *From:* Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Tuesday, 1 April

RE: [OT] NT definition?

While I wouldn't refute Bill Gates as one of the ideal people to answer this question, NT was originally being developed jointly between IBM and MS. Because of this, one should know that others on the original team said something different. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_NT#.27NT.27_design

RE: SmartPhone

To be honest, I've never even thought of looking into AT&T. -Original Message- From: Christopher J. Bosak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 2:31 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SmartPhone I just left Sprint for AT&T. Haven't looked back. Check http:/

RE: SmartPhone

I don't understand it, either. But, they suggest that if a phone is stolen, they can turn off the phone from anywhere, whereas, with a SIM card, it can't be done. -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 2:33 PM To: NT System

RE: Core Configurator

Yeah, but it was posted on this list yesterday :-) Cheers Ken From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 1 April 2008 12:02 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Core Configurator Found this tool today...tested it and works great. http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/files/folders/guyt/en

RE: SmartPhone

Security measure? SIMs are for GSM technology. CDMA (Sprint and Verizon) is different and doesn't use SIM cards -- the phone's ESN is what identifies it with the network. And actually some of our users have phones with CDMA and GSM radios in them, and they use them on CDMA in the states and GSM

Core Configurator

Found this tool today...tested it and works great. http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/files/folders/guyt/entry68860.aspx Configures a core 2008 server with a mini-GUI for day to day tasks. ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~

Ghost question

We are running Ghost 8 here. We have a project to re-image a bunch of Vista machines into XP. We have an XP image setup and ready to go, but here's the problem. We've installed the Ghost client on the Vista machine. However, the Ghost Console is not finding the Vista machine. Does anyone have

RE: Had this, then lost it - blog about multiple Outlook sessions

Is working for me at this point. One profile from inside my domain and one via http/rpc on an external domain. What a great find! Bob Fronk > -Original Message- > From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 2:29 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject

RE: Had this, then lost it - blog about multiple Outlook sessions

Here's another one, Vista's built-in desktop search is confused. I search for something, it's a message in my first Outlook instance, click on it, and it can't open it because it's trying to find it in the second Outlook instance. Close the second instance and all is well. From: Carl Houseman

RE: Had this, then lost it - blog about multiple Outlook sessions

Hi, Exchange source is not required to get this working, so it wouldn't have helped anyway :-) But "yes" - there are lots of partners that license Windows source via "Shared Source" (as can MVPs). I suspect that this is partly due to anti-trust. And also partly for interop reasons - I think th

Re: SmartPhone

Whatever it is to them, its an inhibitor to me. I've never understood the security aspect arguement myself. I was an early US GSM adopter after seeing it in acting in Europe, and I'd never use a device without a accessible SIM. I own 3 phone of different size/functionality/geekness for different

Re: SmartPhone

Whatever it is to them, its an inhibitor to me. I've never understood the security aspect arguement myself. I was an early US GSM adopter after seeing it in acting in Europe, and I'd never use a device without a accessible SIM. I own 3 phone of different size/functionality/geekness for different

RE: SmartPhone

I just left Sprint for AT&T. Haven't looked back. Check http://consumerist.com and search for Sprint. Plenty of reasons to avoid them like the plague. -Original Message- From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 10:49 hrs To: NT System Admin Issues Sub

RE: Had this, then lost it - blog about multiple Outlook sessions

Just be aware of the caveat on the blog post - namely that the tool author hasn't worked out if there's a good reason why you can only load a single Outlook instance at a time. Cheers Ken -Original Message- From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 1 April 2008 11:20 AM T

RE: Had this, then lost it - blog about multiple Outlook sessions

I'm 99.9% certain I first heard about this on one of these Sunbelt lists, probably from Ken, about a month ago. See what happens when you snooze... :) -Original Message- From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 2:20 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE

RE: SmartPhone

Very true, lol :) From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 1:17 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SmartPhone Not sure I'd actually want to drive in China. Scary enough just riding. From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday,

RE: Had this, then lost it - blog about multiple Outlook sessions

I just noticed since cranking up the second session, I'm getting regular event 32's from source Outlook that I never had before. "The store C:\Users\carl\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Outlook\outlook.ost has detected a catalog checkpoint." and "The store C:\Users\carl\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Outloo

RE: Had this, then lost it - blog about multiple Outlook sessions

Finally!! I have been looking for something like this for YEARS. Wonderful find!!! Bob Fronk > -Original Message- > From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 2:07 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Had this, then lost it - bl

RE: SmartPhone

Not sure I'd actually want to drive in China. Scary enough just riding. From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 2:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SmartPhone FYI Ask your car rental place about this. In many places, you can rent SIM Card an

RE: SmartPhone

Verizon suggests that it's a security measure. -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 2:11 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: SmartPhone Lack of SIM compatibility has been the only obstacle for me to use Verizon. On

RE: SmartPhone

FYI Ask your car rental place about this. In many places, you can rent SIM Card and even Data Cards for your laptop. The beauty is that you get them at the airport when you land :) -Sam From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 1:04 PM To: NT S

Re: SmartPhone

Lack of SIM compatibility has been the only obstacle for me to use Verizon. On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Rod Trent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Plus, Verizon does not use SIM cards, which means for me that I can't buy > the iPhone knock-offs over there and use those instead. -- ME2 ~ Upgrade

Re: Had this, then lost it - blog about multiple Outlook sessions

Indeed. This is an outstanding find. Why hasnt something like this been available for years?! On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Michael B. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It really gripes me that I can get source access to the operating system, > but not to Exchange. > > > > Just WHAT is

RE: Had this, then lost it - blog about multiple Outlook sessions

If you could get source to Exchange and it fell into the wrong hands, those hands could be even better than they are now at writing Exchange-compatible servers that run under Linux ... Windows source is probably more accessible thanks to antitrust actions. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:

RE: SmartPhone

Anyone who travels overseas should just get an unlocked GSM phone and get a SIM wherever they land... "Rod Trent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 04/01/2008 01:07 PM Please respond to "NT System Admin Issues" To "NT System Admin Issues" cc Subject RE: SmartPhone Here?s a good reason for me?

RE: SmartPhone

It really wasn't too bad. However, since I'll be heading back pretty regularly from now on, I've found that the best bet is to just pay out the RMB for a China Mobile phone and use the pay per minute. You can get something like 100 minutes for 100 RMB, which as you know, is only like $12 U.S.

  1   2   >