NAS with SAS drives

I tried variuos NAS devices with SATA drives .Last was QNAP and it looks good but a bit slow for some apps. Looking for NAS with SAS drives I found various but with very very high prices. Any advice ? TIA GuidoElia HELPPC ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

securing windows 2003 servers...

Hello everyone, What does everyone do to secure windows servers, both controllers and member boxes. Currently we run MBSA and Eeye Retina scans against our boxes but we don't configure the windows firewall on them or the security configurator. Am I doing enough? We run scans once a month on

Re: changing anti-virus, anti-spam, anti-spyware

I ended up with a wipe and rebuild which took less time than doing it with any of the tools available to us at the time. FWIW, after manually removing all the entries finding all the folders and DLL's Symantec put everywhere I promised myself to never put another admin through that he77 by putting

RE: Microsoft's Free version of Hyper-V Ships! & a random Friday Q

Esxi = free Vmware server = free Im not against MS in any way shape or form, they will end up with a good product and will likely be adopted by a lot of people. I think they have a pretty big battle on their hands here because it will take a lot of people to switch, a game changer if you will.

RE: Microsoft's Free version of Hyper-V Ships! & a random Friday Q

It was still an interesting read. The long and short of it is that it depends on what you want to do; there are some things Hyper-V does better (or at least as well), and there are some things VMWare does better. In my case, we're a Microsoft shop. Their products do what we need, are very affor

Re: changing anti-virus, anti-spam, anti-spyware

Have you tride CleanWipe? http://www.espinola.net/wiki/Image:CleanWipe.zip The only other 100% guaranteed way to get rid of Symantec is a wipe and reload. Holstrom, Don wrote: > Anyone shifted away from Symantec without tearing out their hair? -- Phil Brutsche [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ Finally, po

Re: changing anti-virus, anti-spam, anti-spyware

Some AV vendors will create you a rip and replace tool. Trend is one such vendor. On 10/4/08, Holstrom, Don <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We have been using Symantec products for servers & workstations for a > couple of years now. Bought Vipre for the family/test network, seems to > work fine. Ce

changing anti-virus, anti-spam, anti-spyware

We have been using Symantec products for servers & workstations for a couple of years now. Bought Vipre for the family/test network, seems to work fine. Certainly runs faster, less overhead. However, cannot get rid of Symantec 10.1 or 10.2. Checked the Symantec site and their manual uninstallation

RE: Microsoft's Free version of Hyper-V Ships! & a random Friday Q

From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, 5 October 2008 1:27 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Microsoft's Free version of Hyper-V Ships! & a random Friday Q Hyper-V is a huge step up from Virtual Server. I always hated that app. The web based interface blew with

RE: Microsoft's Free version of Hyper-V Ships! & a random Friday Q

Hyper-V is a huge step up from Virtual Server. I always hated that app. The web based interface blew with teeth. I would love to see Hyper-V written as its own product rather than laid over Windows. One of the things I like about VMware is it only takes about 10-15 minutes to install and it’s s

RE: Microsoft's Free version of Hyper-V Ships! & a random Friday Q

Um, Microsoft cut the price of Virtual Server to $99, and then gave it away for free, well before VMWare started offering VMWare Server v1.0. You used to have to pay for GSX Server... And VMWare Server doesn't use a hypervisor in any case. Whilst Microsoft's technology might be behind VMWare's -

RE: Microsoft's Free version of Hyper-V Ships! & a random Friday Q

Im looking at the cover, but your right, it says on the cover that VMware's ESX KOs Hyper-V in faceoff, I took that as a beatdown, but then in the article it said it gives it the 'edge' Sorry for my interpretation :) -Original Message- From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Se

RE: Triple boot

Huh? Install XP Install Vista - it will recognise the prior operating system and add it to the MS bootloader. Not sure what you mean by Vista being particular about installation demands - it's not different to any other OS Install Ubuntu. Cheers Ken > -Original Message- > From: Peter

RE: Microsoft's Free version of Hyper-V Ships! & a random Friday Q

Can you point us to that article? I couldn't find it. I did find this: http://www.networkworld.com/reviews/2008/090108-test-virtualization.html?inform?ap1=rcb The title is, "VMware edges out Microsoft in virtualization performance test." Since there's a big difference between one product "edging

RE: Triple boot

I've done this and as others have said, the only order to install the OS's is XP, Vista, Ubuntu. If you install Vista first than XP won't recognize the Vista partition and if you install Ubuntu before either Microsoft product then you won't be able to boot into Ubuntu because Microsoft takes over

I seriously doubt it, but....

Is anyone here going to the Citrix Summit Conference in Orlando later this month? Webster ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ ~