We've had no probes with xerox drivers.
Scan to e-mail just works
Scan to folder also
Scan to sharepoint is awesome
On Monday, October 25, 2010, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
We have scan to email, but more interesting is the scan to folder - we
have a special folder set up on our file
On Mon October 25 2010, you wrote:
We have scan to email, but more interesting is the scan to folder - we
have a special folder set up on our file server, and the machine
integrates with AD via LDAP very easily, so setting up permissions was
easy as pie.
Same thing with the Kyoceras we use.
I have RDC on a Server 03, Exchange on an 08 machine. It appears that my RDC
has been slowing. Many of those complaining have an excessive (to me) amount of
items in their InBox: 8-15,000. I am using Office 10 on the 03 server. Anything
I can look out for to speed things up? I re-built RDC
Excessive items in the inbox will certainly cause Outlook to be sluggish,
although I have not seen Outlook 2010 exhibit this as bad as previous versions.
Are these Outlook clients cached?
Another thing to look at on a 2003 server with slow networking is the TCP
chimney issue from a couple
They are not cached. I cache their workstations here, but Remote Desktop
Outlook is not cached...
I had Office 07 on for years, all seemed OK. Office 10 seemed OK at first too.
Then it has slowed.
They foolishly let another company in our server room while I WAS AWAY. And
this is when the
So - as mentioned before I have a project where I need to swing a 2003 32-but
physical machine onto the same physical server after putting 2008 R2 (which is
of course 64-bit only) on it. For this project I don't currently have extra
64-bit hardware but I saw this deal float through and wanted
Question: does a 32-but server require an extra wide bus?
Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology Coordinator
Eagle Physicians Associates, PA
jra...@eaglemds.comBLOCKED::mailto:%20jra...@eaglemds.com
www.eaglemds.comBLOCKED::http://www.eaglemds.com/
From:
No, what makes you ask?
From: Raper, Jonathan - Eagle [mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 7:53 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Opinions on cheap server
Question: does a 32-but server require an extra wide bus?
Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology
I have a file server with a share whose perms are as follows:
- CREATOR OWNER - Full Control (Apply onto: Subfolders and Files Only)
- Everyone - Create Folder/Append Data (Apply onto: This Folder Only)
- Everyone - List Folder/Read Data (Apply onto: This Folder Only)
- Everyone - Read Attributes
32-but vs 32-bit...
Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology Coordinator
Eagle Physicians Associates, PA
jra...@eaglemds.comBLOCKED::mailto:%20jra...@eaglemds.com
www.eaglemds.comBLOCKED::http://www.eaglemds.com/
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
LOLyeah it's special :-P, lotsa but's
From: Raper, Jonathan - Eagle [mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 7:57 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Opinions on cheap server
32-but vs 32-bit...
Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology Coordinator
Eagle
Which reminds me of a restaurant we have here in the North Carolina mountains
named Butts on the Creek...
http://www.mountainshops.com/wnc/butts_creek.html
I can't make this stuff up...
But I will admit that I've eaten there and the barbeque was pretty good!
Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
We just made the change from Canon to Ricoh 2 months ago and our users much
prefer the Ricohs as do I.
I have had a much easier time with the Ricoh drivers than I did with the Canon
drivers. We use the universal drivers for both PS and PCL for the Ricohs and
have no issues at all.
Tim
From:
Double check that the server in question support the AMD-V. Perhaps all
Opterons did (even the old ones) and the motherboard (listed as a Tyan K8SR)
does as well.
Other than that it might work. I bet it's not on VMWares compatibility list
anywhere.
Why can't you do a 32-bit VM on your
Can't really give an opinion on the server, seems like a white box of some
quality. But check out what else customers bought at the bottom of the page...
a 950,000 Volt rechargeable stun gun, and Pepper Attack pepper spray.
David Lum david@nwea.org 10/25/10 7:46 AM
So - as mentioned
I was sort of amused by that too...
Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology Coordinator
Eagle Physicians Associates, PA
jra...@eaglemds.com
www.eaglemds.com
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 11:37 AM
To: NT System
We actually went the other way from Ricoh's to Canon's (mostly IR-3225's)
Here is what I found.
Ricoh's - reliable and fast printing (both from Windows and Unix). They
finally came out with a hardware device (@remote) which will scan multiple
subnets and automatically report back to Ricoh for any
Why can't you do a 32-bit VM on your 64-bit server (Hyper-V)? Is there
something demanding its own hardware?
I want to do exactly that, but I only have one physical box to work with - the
2003 server is on the physical box where I intend on putting the Hyper-V server
on.
Dave
-Original
Disk2vhd to some network storage.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 12:20 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Opinions on cheap
oh I see, and you need a temporary spot to put the current running server?
Have a spare VM capable desktop? Sm:)e. (I'm sure you've already thought of
that.)
--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District
- Original Message -
From: David Lum
[mailto:david@nwea.org]
To: NT System Admin
They're protecting their investment? :D
---
Scott Wilhelm
Computer Technician
Massena Central School District
St. Lawrence-Lewis BOCES
(315) 764-3700 ext. 3046
“The harder I work, the luckier I get. “ -Samuel Goldwyn
Individual commitment to a group effort - that is what makes a team work, a
How did I not think of that? Oh, because I didn't know about it, that's perfect!
Hey doesn't 2008 Backup kind of work in the same way? I know it has nothing to
do with what I need to do, but...
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday,
Yes, a bare metal backup creates a VHD file. Unfortunately, since you are
starting out with Server 2003, that doesn't do you any good. :-)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: David Lum
Remember to stop the exchange service first if you are going to go live
straight away.
I have a disk2Vhd produced drive arriving in my office tomorrow for a
pre-migration check i.e. we do it virtually and create an issues list.
How about disk2vhd to a partition on the new server?
Mike
I have NAS I can use as a target. Question: The server has 2003 installed from
Dell on it. I had them buy 2008 R2 via CDW, am I still in licensing compliance
since the 2003 VM will be on the same box that came with 2003? It hasn't gone
anywhere, it'll just be virtualized on the retail 2008 R2
+1. Our Xerox 7665 is two years into our lease and I wouldn't change a
thing. Our office users love this machine. No special software required on
the clients for scanning and the AD integration brings in the email
addresses automatically. All sorts of accounting and quota options
available,
Anyone want to share any experiences with these guys?
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and
My experience when going p2v was that the Dell oem license wont work when it is
virtual.
Virtual machines don't see the real hardware and something in the license check
will fail.
-Original Message-
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 2:40 PM
To:
IIRC it will ask you to re-register Windows so if you have the key code from
the original install it will work. Methinks MS doesn't consider this a legal
copy though..
-Original Message-
From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 2:59 PM
To: NT
I can confirm this with SBS 2003.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Glen Johnson gjohn...@vhcc.edu wrote:
My experience when going p2v was that the Dell oem license wont work when
it is virtual.
Virtual machines don't see the real hardware and something in the license
check will fail.
No personal experience but have heard good things about them. But bear in
mind somewhere in the last 3 months or so they were acquired by Dell, and I
don't know if the acquisition has any effect on their operations.
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks, Security
' Security is an
Yes, I knew Dell had acquired them but I doubt it's as bad as if Symantec or
McAfee had bought them ;-). I've heard good things too but I need some real
experience horror stories as we're seriously considering them.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
Sent:
I used Kace before the acquisition by Dell and very much liked their product.
However, when comparing it to SCE from Microsoft for very similar capabilities
Kace was quite a bit more expensive. I'm not sure if that has changed since
Dell entered the picture or not.
Tim
-Original
Not having looked into SCE does it do well with 3rd party apps (like acrobat) ?
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families
- Original Message -
From: Tim Vander Kooi tvanderk...@expl.com
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Mon Oct
Possible to addin hotfixes you manually download from MS?
I have a few I need to apply across the board...
Thanks!
jlc
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
We evaluated them about a year ago. Seemed to be a pretty complete solution
except for the help desk part. It was easy to set up. I downloaded a VM,
deployed a few agents and was deploying software with a couple of days. We
needed a more functional help desk, so we ended up with Altiris
I have a kbox 1000 series here and it's great. Regarding pricing, the pricing
model is much improved since Dell acquired KBox. No more modules to purchase.
Instead just purchase agent licenses and you get everything. And it costs less
than when Kace owned it. Dell's pricing is very
Tim is correct in that the help desk module is more basic than others. We
already have another help desk system in place, so that was not part of our
consideration. To me it didn't matter since we purchased it for desktop/server
admin, not call tracking or work-flow.
Tim Evans
You should get 2 keys in the box, one for virtual and one for physical. When
the activation service runs it checks to see the key type.
Is it plain 2008, or SBS that you are migrating to? If SBS 2008 then get SA
added to the boxed product as the SBS '7' is currently in the Beta ovens at
It's an SBS domain, but this is a 2nd DC and relatively simple
DNS/DHCP/file/print server P2V onto plain 2008 R2.
Soon (in a year maybe, time goes by FAST) I will have to look into the SBS2K3
- SBS2K8 swing, but at least the SBS box is already virtual.
-Original Message-
From: Mike
Totally agree with the ease of use deployment with the Kbox, we trialed it
at my last job. Company went into administration the week before the IT
manager was to sign off on the purchase.
That finalized my reason for leaving.
We didn't need the helpdesk so I didn't look at it, the app
I believe the System Center Update Packager (SCUP) is available as a free out
of band download now. This thing lets you plug stuff in to WSUS.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com]
Sent: Monday, October 25,
Not finding anything on Bing or Google. Do you happen to have a link handy? Or
does this require Essentials?
From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 4:35 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: WSUS and non public patches
I believe the System Center
Look for System Center Updates Publisher.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/systemcenter/bb741049.aspx
-Malcolm
From: Crawford, Scott [mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 16:47
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: WSUS and non public patches
Not
If you have SCCM 2007 -
AdminStudio Configuration Manager Edition
http://www.flexerasoftware.com/promolanding/7698.htm
From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 12:41 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: WSUS and non public patches
Possible to
Administration=recievership?
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Tony Patton apco...@gmail.com wrote:
Totally agree with the ease of use deployment with the Kbox, we trialed
it at my last job. Company went into administration the week before the IT
manager was to sign off on the purchase.
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Joseph L. Casale
jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:
We have some Canon iR’s that are showing their teeth and the proposed
replacements by a couple reps are either Ricoh Ficio MP 5000SP or a Xerox
WorkCenter 5790.
We took delivery of a Xerox WorkCenter 5755 in
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Joseph L. Casale
jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:
One question about the email capabilities, is it very configurable in so
far as the email format? Rather than have everyone send a zillion attachments
to my exchange server, I hoped to send the mail to a Postfix
Wouldn't it make more sense to scan-to-FTP/SMB/whatever, and just have the
copier drop the file there, rather than futz around with email filters?
That's what we do; works great.
Sure, if I can get it to go where I need:)
With a generic account that it will likely use to access the
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Joseph L. Casale
jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:
Wouldn't it make more sense to scan-to-FTP/SMB/whatever,
and just have the copier drop the file there, rather than futz
around with email filters? That's what we do; works great.
With a generic account that
Remember the business vs. IT factors. Where I am now, the engineers have an
ftp site. No drama.
Where I was before, the business folks had Ricoh's set for scan-to-email,
because they got email, across variable devices, and got if I scan it, Joe
will read it.
I don't know if that's
I moved from Blue Host to Dream Host a while back. I would recommend the
same. Dream Host is better across the board imho; for the same price.
--
ME2
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Art DeKneef art.dekn...@cox.net wrote:
Anyone using them or have any comments? Checking for a client who
I don't get it. What's the issue?
Because they scan sensitive/private stuff and unless it works like it used it
to with
the old office scan app where they save it to their desktop, they won't want it
in a
publicly accessible folder.
As per my other thread about perms, I haven't crafted a
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Joseph L. Casale
jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:
Because they scan sensitive/private stuff and unless
it works like it used it to with the old office scan app
where they save it to their desktop, they won't want
it in a publicly accessible folder.
Ah, I
http://www.newlaunches.com/archives/the_worlds_smallest_full_hd_display_eats_the_retina_display_for_breakfast.php
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
Ah, I see. Some ideas:
/snip
Yeah, that's why I was intending on using procmail and scan-to-email so
attachments would never
see my exchange server. Pretty sure I could whip something up based on who they
email it to (Themselves).
A better solution so they don't even have to leave the doc on
Does anybody know if 2 kinds of licensing can coexist on the same
network?
I.e. OVS and OEM ?
TIA
GuidoElia
HELPPC
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
57 matches
Mail list logo
