Just to add to that, if one of the original recipients forwards the email to
themselves, they DON'T see the attachment. If they forward it to someone else
then that someone DOES see the attachments.
From: Oliver Marshall
Sent: 17 August 2011 10:42
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook,
For the sake of google I think that this has solved it for us;
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/exchangesvrclients/thread/5ee6b1d2-865f-4c81-bb3e-b72d30d1845f/
From: Oliver Marshall
Sent: 17 August 2011 10:46
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook, forwarding and the
ROFL!
* *
*ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of
Technology for the SMB market…
*
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:33 PM, William Robbins dangerw...@gmail.comwrote:
I think it was monks that made this mythical. :) None of the protectors
of blinking lights could
We're on 10.2 actually. These are all on Dells as well though.
How many laptops do you have running SSDs w/ PGP without an issue?
I'm curious if it's just something our helpdesk guys are doing wrong
when they image them.
Jon
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 5:48 PM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
::high five::
'grats!
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Sherry Abercrombie
sabercrom...@nhdallas.com wrote:
Yes, did I mention the free training perk? Of course it’s on a standby
basis, but yes, training = Woot!
** **
*From:* William Robbins [mailto:dangerw...@gmail.com]
*Sent:*
Mythical? Nay. I say unto you, it exists. It can oft be found in the
Base of Knowledge in pristine condition, as though it was never read.
Yea verily, it is often eagerly sought after by cowans after new
instructions do not behave as expected, typically on oracles of great
importance.
From:
I don't think it was a question to agree. It's just that they were on
call 24/7, putting in 10-12 hour days, and that puts a dent in the
romance department. And thus explains the beer and wine thing. J
From: William Robbins [mailto:dangerw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 9:33
Just received this via email - standard phish sort of mail, but
interestingly, the malware is embedded in a Google spreadsheet rather than
directly linked. Something to be aware of, as users may trust the *good
name* of Google and click more readily.
*Your web mail quota has exceeded the set
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 8:45 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:
Just received this via email - standard phish sort of mail, but
interestingly, the malware is embedded in a Google spreadsheet ...
Oh, awesome. :-(
Was it like an embedded EXE file, or some kind of web-ish content
Apparently it can be either, or just some sort of specially-crafted
spreadsheet designed to exploit Excel vulnerabilities.
Either way, it's an interesting development. Also notably, my (Google) spam
filter let it through :-)
On 17 August 2011 14:12, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
On
Make that browser vulnerabilities
On 17 August 2011 14:16, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:
Apparently it can be either, or just some sort of specially-crafted
spreadsheet designed to exploit Excel vulnerabilities.
Either way, it's an interesting development. Also notably, my
Doh!
I just ordered a TS-859U-RP+ and 9 drives (on the supported list) from
Newegg yesterday.
Thank you very much for the information and thoughtful review. I might
order a smaller unit as a spare for emergencies.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Ben Serebin b...@reefsolutions.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
Just a quick couple of questions about Meeting Room resources
Exchange 2007 SP3
Outlook 2007SP3\Outlook 2010
* Can you specify that a specific group of users can over write
existing booking in a meeting room?
* When a user leaves is there any way that the meetings
I find that KB article confusing - it confirms that Server 2008 can do LM
authentication, and that it uses the registry key to control what
authentication is accepted . We've had group policy in place for ages
(possibly ever since we went to Active Directory) that does what that KB
suggests
Touche'
- WJR
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 07:23, Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.com wrote:
I don’t think it was a question to “agree”. It’s just that they were on
call 24/7, putting in 10-12 hour days, and that puts a dent in the romance
department. And thus explains the beer and wine
Sherry, welcome back! Maybe we will run into each other the next time you
are in OKC. We are off of N63rd Street and the Broadway Extension.
Later,
Devin Meade
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Sherry Abercrombie
sabercrom...@nhdallas.com wrote:
Hello everyone, I’m finally back. After
Interesting. I don't know how many, but we're probably up to 20-30 and more all
the time as NWEA hires about 70-80 folks/year and we are on a regular system
replacement cycle so we could be up to 100 for all I know.
Does Symantec have any useful input, or have you contacted them yet?
Do they
Good heavens. That's progress?
The IIS team must've taken tips from the Exchange team on removing previous GUI
features and making users work more with config files and command prompts.
But thanks-I'll give this a shot.
John
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Tuesday,
Haven't seen this behaviour before.
I have a single 2008 R2 domain controller. The 'Default Domain Policy' has
the following setup:
Account lockout duration: 5 minutes
Account lockout threshhold: 10 invalid attempts
Reset account lockout counter after:5 minutes
The other GPOs (there's only
There are ups and downs.
In exchange 2007 and exchange 2010 - you have access to a lot more knobs and
buttons than you did in prior versions. However, access to those can often make
you drop to PowerShell and occasionally to a modifying a flat file.
The same is true for IIS 7 and IIS 7.5.
Gpresult /R
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: jesse-r...@wi.rr.com [mailto:jesse-r...@wi.rr.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 11:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: 2008 r2 password policy not going
My only thought is based on an experience a few years ago moving some
clustered services to a single VM. The P2V went fine and I was left with a
one node cluster as you intend.
The only problem I encountered was when doing snapshot-based image backups
using VCB. The creation of a snapshot
I had already done that using the GPResults Wizards within the Group Policy
Management. It shows the correct amount of retries, 10.
Doing it from a computer, also shows 10 for retries too...Still get
locked out after 3 attempts.
JR
Original Message:
-
From: Michael B.
You didn't tell us you had already done that. :-)
Does a gpupdate /force make any difference? I'm guessing not.
Have you deployed fine grained password setting objects?
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc770394(WS.10).aspx
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
I think I may have found why.. Looks like there migth be a fine grain
policy applied to the domain. (under ADUC - System - Password Settings
Container
Checking...
Original Message:
-
From: jesse-r...@wi.rr.com jesse-r...@wi.rr.com
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:43:18 -0400
To:
We can only hope that doesn't happen. Ever.
Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com 8/16/2011 7:12 PM
The suck which has infested HP for the past several years continues
to spread. We just today took a delivery of a brand new DesignJet
T790. $4500 wide-format printer.
The control panel UI is
Courtesy of SANS.
http://www.securingthehuman.org/resources/newsletters/ouch
Also if anyone needs some nice cheat sheets on IPV6, Incident Response,
Windump, TCpdump, etc etc see me offline, I got a ton of them from my
last sans training to share with everyone.
Z
Edward E. Ziots
Hello Richard,
Cisco doesn’t have anything similar to the TS-859U-RP. That’s
an excellent unit. Other comment is disable EVERYTHING but iSCSI (e.g. Network
Services Application Servers). And recommend you test the unit for 1-2 months
before you go into production including
Thanks again, Ben.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Ben Serebin b...@reefsolutions.com wrote:
Hello Richard,
** **
Cisco doesn’t have anything similar to the TS-859U-RP.
That’s an excellent unit. Other comment is disable EVERYTHING but iSCSI
(e.g. Network Services
Win Vista with current SP/updates. No domain.
We want to be able to have non-admin users install fonts.
Have removed the Hidden and ReadOnly attributes on C:\Windows\Fonts\.
Have granted Modify permission to BUILTIN\Userspermission on:
C:\Windows\Fonts\
Can you directly copy the ttf to the Fonts folder?
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Install fonts w/out admin on Vista; bypass UAC on a DLL?
Win Vista with current SP/updates.
I'd like the IPv6 material please :)
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Ziots, Edward ezi...@lifespan.org wrote:
Courtesy of SANS.
** **
http://www.securingthehuman.org/resources/newsletters/ouch
** **
Also if anyone needs some nice cheat sheets on IPV6, Incident Response,
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Crawford, Scott crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote:
Can you directly copy the ttf to the Fonts folder?
In my experience, Windows won't see them properly until they're
registered. But I haven't tried that on Vista; I suppose it's worth a
shot. I'll see what happens.
Registration isn't required on Win7; I can't remember about Vista.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 2:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
PSOs are applied to global groups or users - not possible to apply it to the
domain per-se.
It's also possible that whatever you're testing this with is generating more
than one failed logon attempt in a single transaction. This can happen,
especially with older stuff.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
+10
Have seen that happen several times when software goes whacky.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 2:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 2008 r2 password policy not going into effect?
It's also possible
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 08:13, John Hornbuckle
john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us wrote:
Good heavens. That’s progress?
Yes, absolutely.
The IIS team must’ve taken tips from the Exchange team on removing previous
GUI features and making users work more with config files and command
prompts.
The SANS Ouch is good stuff.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 09:57, Ziots, Edward ezi...@lifespan.org wrote:
Courtesy of SANS.
** **
http://www.securingthehuman.org/resources/newsletters/ouch
** **
Also if anyone needs some nice cheat sheets on IPV6, Incident Response,
Windump,
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 08:13, John Hornbuckle
john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us wrote:
Good heavens. That’s progress?
Yes, absolutely.
The IIS team must’ve taken tips from the Exchange team on removing
previous
GUI
Nope. WMI is the way to go, but you can invoke it via powershell. Google
powershell disk label and it's the third link from the top.
DAMIEN SOLODOW
Systems Engineer
317.447.6033 (office)
317.447.6014 (fax)
HARRISON COLLEGE
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sca...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17,
Get-PsDrive | Select Root, Description
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sca...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 2:31 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Get-PSDrive
Anyway to get this PS function to list
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Sam Cayze sca...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway to get this PS function to list the disk’s labels? If not, is there
another command that will?
If you have *nix tools:
vol C: | head -n 1 | sed s/ Volume in drive [A-Z] is //
-- Ben
~ Finally, powerful endpoint
Doh!
That's what I get for trusting Google instead of waiting for St Michael to set
us straight. ;)
DAMIEN SOLODOW
Systems Engineer
317.447.6033 (office)
317.447.6014 (fax)
HARRISON COLLEGE
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 2:36 PM
To: NT
Great, worked like a champ! I'm doing it on a remote machine, so glad it
stated easy-peasy like this.
Now, how would a PS noob like me find that out? I looked here, but it
didn't list what I was able to query.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd315263.aspx
I did figure out how
Well he beat me, but I would have used ft -autosize but that only is useful
for screen display
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Damien Solodow
damien.solo...@harrison.edu wrote:
Doh!
That’s what I get for trusting Google instead of waiting for St Michael to
set us straight. ;)
Get-PsDrive | fl *
That's exactly what I did.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sca...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 2:44 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Get-PSDrive
Great, worked like a
Pt.
That's why my answers tend toward brevity.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Damien Solodow [mailto:damien.solo...@harrison.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 2:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Get-PSDrive
Doh!
Question 2. Out of curiosity, if you have time.
Different formatting/results if I run the script locally or remotely. (The
PS Script being the exact same command). Yet both still work and give me
what I need.
If I run it on my machine:
Get-PSDrive | where {$_.Provider.Name -eq FileSystem}
Yep you bet…
Z
Edward E. Ziots
CISSP, Network +, Security +
Security Engineer
Lifespan Organization
Email:ezi...@lifespan.org
Cell:401-639-3505
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 2:17 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Some
It's been a looong time since I've tried it, but I thought that was how I've
installed fonts in the past. Mind you, my experience with this might be limited
to win95 or possibly even 3.1.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011
They were interested in features and compatibility
Didn't we go through all this stuff with Microsoft back in the last decade?
* *
*ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of
Technology for the SMB market…
*
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Ben Scott
I have ONE user who's complaining that his email (POP3) in Outlook is
delayed by a day, but ONLY from the work POP server. His personal email, he
says, is NOT delayed and he can log into webmail and see it and it's coming
to his Smart Phone on time, but Outlook is delayed by a day.
Unfortunately,
Tell him to hit the little plus arrow next to Date: Today.
-Original Message-
From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 2:15 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Strange Outlook problem
I have ONE user who's complaining that his email
Hmm... you think that's all it is? Hopefully that'll be the problem and
it'll be an easy fix. :D I didn't even think of that as my email is always
expanded by default. :D
From: N Parr [mailto:npar...@mortonind.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 3:20 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:
I fail to see your point. :-)
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote:
They were interested in features and compatibility
Didn't we go through all this stuff with Microsoft back in the last decade?
* *
*ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the
Here are some articles that outline changes to NTLM in 2008r2 (and Win7)
- http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/46922
- http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd566199(WS.10).aspx
NTLM is supported, so long as 128-bit encryption is enabled, which might not
be true of older OSes.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote:
They were interested in features and compatibility
Didn't we go through all this stuff with Microsoft back in the last decade?
As a wise man once said, Indeed.
You'd think people would learn.
Well, okay, maybe you
And so have they. :)
* *
*ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of
Technology for the SMB market…
*
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.comwrote:
I fail to see your point. :-)
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Andrew S. Baker
Is the email he sends delayed, or the email he receives delayed? My guess
is his pop or smtp connection is being blocked by a firewall, but when he
moves locations, it's finally being accepting and the messages go through.
Sam
From: N Parr [mailto:npar...@mortonind.com]
Sent: Wednesday,
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 3:15 PM, John Aldrich
jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com wrote:
I have ONE user who's complaining that his email (POP3) in Outlook is
delayed by a day, but ONLY from the work POP server.
Have him forward a copy of one of the messages **WITH FULL HEADERS**
to you and the
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 3:19 PM, N Parr npar...@mortonind.com wrote:
Tell him to hit the little plus arrow next to Date: Today.
That wouldn't explain why his other email account gets mail on time.
-- Ben
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
We had the user log in to another Windows 7 workstation and then a XP
workstation and was able to modify and save the file on both, so the problem is
localized to the workstation itself but only for that profile. If another user
logs into the problem workstation, it works just fine. The
Servers Alive used to monitor 10 for free
http://www.woodstone.nu/salive/features.php
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
Did you use select or FT or FL?
The additional values are called remote decorations. That is, they identify
on what machine and what PowerShell instance on that machine were used to
generate the results.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
Nagios
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Jonathan ncm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking for more than a simple up/down notification.
I've googled, and the only things I've found are some payware apps of
questionable origin, complete network monitoring packages, or apps that are
not
True, maybe he's sorting them in to another folder or it is a totally
different profile. He didn't say. I like to apply KISS methodology
first. Besides, we only have the word of the user and John at this
point saying his personal email isn't delayed.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott
We are currently working towards implementing DirectAccess for our new AD
environment we're creating. My coworker is the one doing the heavy lifting on
this one. He's seeing some conflicting info on where to put the NLS piece.
For those that have DirectAccess implemented, where is that piece
GUI's are limiting, but there's no need to throw the baby out with the bath
water. If developers want to add more functionality via a CLI, that's great.
But to simultaneously REMOVE functionality from a GUI isn't my idea of progress.
IIS 7 let's you configure IP restrictions at the site level
Do you mean inside vs. outside? Inside.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 4:14 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: DirectAccess
Messages *received* are supposedly being delayed on his home PC. HE has a
smart phone and it downloads the email on-time and Webmail (on the server,
of course) shows the email in a timely fashion as well. I wonder if maybe
the solution isn't as easy as N Parr suggested. I sure hope so. :D
From:
Yeah... VERY true... as Greg House, M.D. says Everybody lies.:D I'll have
to check and see when he gets home and I get a chance to log into his
machine and see what's up.
-Original Message-
From: N Parr [mailto:npar...@mortonind.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 4:08 PM
To: NT
Thanks, Ben. That's a very good idea. I'll do that when I get access to his
machine. This user is (like most) not very computer-literate. I don't trust
him to be able to follow instructions. :D
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August
Woot! Recreating the profile fixed the problem! Very strange as that file
was the only one that appeared to be giving her a problem. I hope we can
narrow it down a little further before the other user needs to be fixed as well.
-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul
I was just having this discussion today. I wish Windows would allow for a
separate user folder specified to look for fonts. This way you could allow
users to dump fonts into a folder they had persmission to or a network
location for a group of people. Anyway, here is a command line option that
you
I use hirens boot cd http://www.hirensbootcd.org/download/
The quality control can be a bit patchy, but I have used it for years
wtihout issues
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 3:31 AM, Guyer, Don don.gu...@fiserv.com wrote:
This doesn’t surprise me at all...
** **
I downloaded and installed the
Yes, sorry. He's saying one thing he's reading says to put it out in the
public area, others say to put it deep inside.
Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com 8/17/2011 1:31 PM
Do you mean inside vs. outside? Inside.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
Thanks, but it doesn't look like Servers Alive will do what I need.
Essentially, I need a continuous ping:
Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=245
Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=245
Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=245
Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32
As we have not heard from you in the last 48 hours, we have closed the
ticket.
Please do not hesitate to contact us again.
To open a support call just email ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com where
a new ticket will be assigned.
Thank you for contacting us
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:28 AM,
Hmmm 1999, so a bit old, but if it still works, then this bat is a little more
generic. You can just drag a font onto it and it will create the reg, copy the
file, import the reg and then delete the reg.
One problem is that it won't pull the actual name of the font, instead it will
use
Got an odd one...did a migration from 2003 to 2011 SBS a few weeks back.
The one nagging issue is on the remote web interface (which is great I might
add).
This computer can't verify the identity of the RD gateway...It's not safe to
connectyadda yadda
There is no problem connecting
Should *every* single bit of software be installed in admin mode. by this
I mean things like .net framework and C++ 2008 redistributable.
Or to put it another way , are there any that should not be?
yours confused
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
Check out PingPlotter Pro, it can be used for free for 30 days.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Jonathan ncm...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, but it doesn't look like Servers Alive will do what I need.
Essentially, I need a continuous ping:
Reply from 10.10.10.10: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=245
Inside, it's what DA computers check for to see if they're on the domain
network IIRC
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Heaton jhea...@dfg.ca.gov
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Wed
If software installers are built to Microsoft programming standards, the
installer should detect it is running on a TS/RDS server and automatically
switch in and out of install mode (not admin mode). I still prefer to manually
do a change user /install and then change user /execute for most
Cheap and dirty, but might do the trick.
Usage is:
PingResponse IP AcceptableTime
For example, PingResponse google.com 10 would repeatedly ping google and if it
was ever over 10 milliseconds, blat will email you. Note that there's only 5
lines so watch wrapping. Also, this will not message you
A bit old? Have you looked at the Font install dialog from Vista? It's
unchanged since Windows 3.1, maybe even older. Not saying the whole
subsystem is that old but it's weird one part went for so long with little
attention.
--
Mike Gill
-Original Message-
From: Crawford, Scott
Ta, The problem is, I am just in the throws of installing IBM client access
V7R1 and I installed the MS products (.net framework and C++ 2005
redistributable) without changing the mode.(basically assuming if it is a
MSproduct it should know about TS/RDS)
I then installed the IBM product (I use the
Windows updates are TS/RDS aware. Best Practice is NO users, except the admin
doing the install, should be logged in OR have ANY sessions (connected or
disconnected) on the server having software or updates installed.
Why? /install monitor file system and registry activity to see what needs
I'm in the habit of kicking everyone off, disabling the connection, and
manually changing to install mode. When I'm finished with whatever it is
I'm doing, including updates and patches for software from any vendor, I
reboot then back out the config changes.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 6:55 PM,
How many TS/RDS servers do you have?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 7:07 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Speaking of RDS..
I'm in the
I just meant the article.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Gill [mailto:lis...@canbyfoursquare.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 5:49 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Install fonts w/out admin on Vista; bypass UAC on a DLL?
A bit old? Have you looked at the Font install
If you are on Server 2008 or Server 2008 R2, you have the new “drain mode”.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/askperf/archive/2007/08/10/windows-server-2008-terminal-services-server-drain-mode.aspx
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
handy tip! :D
In this case I am the only user loged in as domain admin
I am connected via mstsc /admin
The RDS servers are VMs in ESXi 4.1
As an update I am now getting new errors (MVC9.0 now) indicating I have
another MS product to install as a prerequisite (probably C++ 2008
redistributable)
I
Making or Partaking of beer and wine?
Jon
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:33 PM, William Robbins dangerw...@gmail.comwrote:
I think it was monks that made this mythical. :) None of the protectors
of blinking lights could agree to the celibacy bit. (just the making of
beer and wine)
Which is
It may be starting already. I received an email this morning with the subject:
Critical Alert for your Modular Ethernet Switches and Fixed Port L3 Managed
Ethernet Switches. It said: K.15.05.0002 removed from web due to unexpected
reboots.
K.15.05.0002 was released June 20 but the advisory is
I seem to remember that for 95, 98, and 98SE that sometimes the font would
need to be registered but if it was a Microsoft font it would not need
registration it would work. Non-Microsoft fonts would be those coming from
Adobe. I have not done any font changes since Windows 2000.
Jon
On Wed,
Paypal will give you single use or timer driven credit card numbers...
I imagine I'm not the only one on this alias who will tell you that buying
things online and accessing my bank account online have never proven to be a
poor decision. I'm more inclined to think twice about what's going on
A moment of silence to mourn what has become of the company that used to
make the LaserJet4 and my trusty DesignJet550C
-sc
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 10:12 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: [OT] The infection
I'd suggest the two aren't mutually exclusive.
Many a management GUI has just been shoving data to and from the
registry for years now. This need be no different if the configuration
container is an XML based config file instead.
-sc
From: Steven Peck [mailto:sep...@gmail.com]
Sent:
IIRC, the protetctions for business use of credit cards are the same as
consumer protection. I could be wrong, though. You're subject to a maximum
of $50 for fraudulent transactions, and generally that's waived. That being
said, as in all things, you have to be doing some basic bookkeeping.
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
