On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote:
https://www.infosecisland.com/blogview/16130-The-Urban-Legend-of-Multipass-Hard-Disk-Overwrite.html
I have never seen an official copy of NISPOM (DoD 5220.22-M) that
specified specific overwrite methods. I seriously
Yes, and at least the MS link was useful. (I had already found both links
before crying for help.)
Someone else (Ken?) sent a link to the IIS 6 Resources Kit. That had the
metadata browser that I sorely needed. Between that brower and the MS
link (showing the decimal values for the
I'll take a look. Perhaps something I missed. Thanks, folks.
Lists - Level Five li...@levelfive.us 8/29/2011 10:42 PM
Check on your AD Sites if you have the Subnets setup correctly? Is this a flat
layer2 ME or routed/vpn ??
We ran into this on our flat layer-2 where we found hundreds of
Looks like it's hosted by Akamai, which might explain why you can't get an
answer from the folks running the course.
From: Damien Solodow [mailto:damien.solo...@harrison.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 8:51 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: How to determine a host's IP range
Do
Which begs the question - just how DOES SSD play into this?
From: Crawford, Scott [mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 5:46 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Interesting Article about secure hard disk overwrites
Of course the whole issue is moot now that we're
When I ran:
dig +short txt_netblocks.pearsoncmg.com There were no results
returned.
To check my syntax, I tried the same command on google:
dig +short txt _netblocks.google.com
v=spf1 ip4:216.239.32.0/19 ip4:64.233.160.0/19 ip4:66.249.80.0/20
ip4:72.14.192.0/18
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Tom Miller tmil...@hnncsb.org wrote:
When I attempted to do a simple ping test, all of the Windows 2008 servers
(member and DC) were slow to respond and had some missing pings. This was
not an issue with our 2003 or non-Windows systems. Same issue wether I
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Thomas Mullins
tsmull...@wise.k12.va.us wrote:
dig +short txt_netblocks.pearsoncmg.com There were no results
returned.
Where did txt_netblocks.pearsoncmg.com come from? That doesn't
appear to be an existent domain name. It's even questionable
I don't know about other firewalls, but recent SonicWalls allow you to
create network objects based on FQDN and then use those objects in
your rules. Might something like that be an option? It's been
exactly the ticket for me when having to deal with a situation similar
to what you are facing.
Our web filter is a Barracuda, and does not have an option for the domain name.
Shane
-Original Message-
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 9:51 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: How to determine a host's IP range
I don't know
Thanks Ben,
I used the wrong domain name. When ns.pearsoncmg.com is queried for
media.pearsoncmg.com, this is what is returned in the answer section:
;; ANSWER SECTION:
media.pearsoncmg.com. 808 IN CNAME
media.pearsoncmg.com.edgesuite.net.
media.pearsoncmg.com.edgesuite.net.
I dig it man!
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Roger Wright rhw...@gmail.com wrote:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/keithcombs/archive/2011/08/29/i-m-a-virt-guy.aspx
Roger Wright
___
My short term goal is to make it through the day.
My long term goal is to string a bunch of short term goals
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Richard Stovall rich...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know about other firewalls, but recent SonicWalls allow you to
create network objects based on FQDN and then use those objects in
your rules.
How does that cope with a CDN which might generate different IP
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Thomas Mullins
tsmull...@wise.k12.va.us wrote:
dig +noall +ans ANY media.pearsoncmg.com. @ns.pearsoncmg.com.
I am going to read and learn how to use dig.
The two important parts were:
* The ANY directive, which tells dig to query for any known DNS
records.
On my SonicWall, if a create a rule for media.pearsoncmg.com, I can
write rules which allow or deny access no matter the underlying ip.
Here's the definition SonicWall uses to describe ther FQDN network
object.
FQDN Address Objects are resolved using the DNS servers configured on
the SonicWALL in
That should have been ...if I create a network object for
media.pearsoncmg.com...
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Richard Stovall rich...@gmail.com wrote:
On my SonicWall, if a create a rule for media.pearsoncmg.com, I can
write rules which allow or deny access no matter the underlying ip.
Hi All,
Recently I have been informed that having file and print sharing turned on
takes up considerable bandwidth on the network. I know Appletalk is a very
chatty protocol but never was aware that Microsoft File and Print sharing was.
The differnet places I worked prior to this we always
LOL
* *
*ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of
Technology for the SMB market…
*
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Roger Wright rhw...@gmail.com wrote:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/keithcombs/archive/2011/08/29/i-m-a-virt-guy.aspx
Roger Wright
___
My short
I wasn't aware that file and printer sharing was a bandwidth hog, I've never
heard or read anything that would suggest it is. I could be completely wrong
though, but I've never had to turn it off for bandwidth reasons.
On 30 August 2011 17:05, Darin dmche...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Recently
Has someone quantified this for you and shown the top endpoints?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c – 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Darin [mailto:dmche...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 11:05 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: File and Print
what about using this as a solution:
http://www.akamai.com/html/misc/akamai_client/netsession_interface_faq.html
Richard Stovall wrote:
That should have been ...if I create a network object for
media.pearsoncmg.com...
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Richard Stovall rich...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps you should consider giving us some more details about your network,
and what you deem considerable bandwidth so that we have some context for
your observations.
As James mentioned, I can't say that I've ever seen FP cause any bandwidth
concerns across a variety of networks.
* *
*ASB*
That's 2.5 minutes of my life I can never get back.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 12:15 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Has Anyone used VMlimited?
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 04:51, richardmccl...@aspca.org wrote:
snip
2. I won't know until later in the week if it actually did turn off TURN,
ATRN, ETRN, etc.
Can you telnet to the installation and issue commands? That should
tell you right away.
Kurt
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security
I believe this tells me TURN is no longer enabled:
===
220 faxcore1.napcc.aspca.int Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version:
6.0.3790.4675 ready at Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:10:27 -0
500
ehlo
250-faxcore1.napcc.aspca.int Hello [10.1.2.226]
250-SIZE
250-PIPELINING
250-DSN
250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Richard Stovall rich...@gmail.com wrote:
On my SonicWall, if a create a rule for media.pearsoncmg.com, I can
write rules which allow or deny access no matter the underlying ip.
There's no intrinsic relationship between an IP address and a DNS
name. From
Fraudulent *.google.com Certificate at Mozilla Security Blog:
http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2011/08/29/fraudulent-google-com-certif
icate/
Status
Because the extent of the mis-issuance is not clear, we are releasing
new versions of Firefox for desktop (3.6.21, 6.0.1, 7, 8, and 9) and
Works with the majors (Citrix/Xen, VMware, KVM), except HyperV, which
is coming soon...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/08/29/citrix_cloud_com_update/
Looks very cool for private clouds.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
Not just FF - MSFT is issuing a revocation for its products.
CERT notification to follow...
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:40, Ziots, Edward ezi...@lifespan.org wrote:
Fraudulent *.google.com Certificate at Mozilla Security Blog:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Current Activity us-c...@us-cert.gov
Date: Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 06:13
Subject: US-CERT Current Activity - Fraudulent DigiNotar SSL Certificate
To: Current Activity current-activ...@us-cert.gov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
US-CERT
I stand corrected,
Looks like DigiNotar can’t be trusted right now J
Z
Edward E. Ziots
CISSP, Network +, Security +
Security Engineer
Lifespan Organization
Email:ezi...@lifespan.org
Cell:401-639-3505
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 30,
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Darin dmche...@gmail.com wrote:
Recently I have been informed that having file and print sharing turned on
takes up considerable bandwidth on the network.
As others have said, you need to clarify and quantify that
statement. For example, if there's a lot of
You might have to use TURN, instead of turn.
Also, you can try ETRN and ATRN.
But, from the looks of it, you have indeed fixed your problem.
Kurt
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:14, richardmccl...@aspca.org wrote:
I believe this tells me TURN is no longer enabled:
===
220
* Disable the browser service on anything not one of those designated masters
+1
I run a GPO here to turn off the browser service on our workstations.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 11:06 AM
To: NT System Admin
You actually like something with cloud in its name?
* *
*ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of
Technology for the SMB market…
*
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Works with the majors (Citrix/Xen, VMware, KVM), except HyperV,
Private clouds can certainly make sense. Public and mixed clouds don't make
so much sense to me.
Kurt
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:54, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote:
You actually like something with cloud in its name?
* *
*ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the
Sure do.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCloud_(TV_series)
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
http://www.CarlWebster.comhttp://www.carlwebster.com/
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 1:55 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Private clouds can certainly make sense.
Even if it doesn't have a keyboard?
-- Ben
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
---
To
I like to collect them all.
Rain clouds
Thunder clouds
Clouds with a silver lining.. silver liningss.
Actually, I need to read some white papers on building private clouds. It
doesn't make sense to me until I read how they're put together. I found
microsoft's site with white papers
Cloud based keyboard AND mouse. No cables required.
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
http://www.CarlWebster.com
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 3:14 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 13:13, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Private clouds can certainly make sense.
Even if it doesn't have a keyboard?
Mine will always have keyboards...
Kurt
~ Finally, powerful endpoint
KeyboardHow Quaint..
-Scotty
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9kTVZiJ3Uc
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 1:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Open Source cloud stack
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 13:13,
On the other hand, if it's doing reverse dns on every ip that hits the
firewall, it could work. You're assuming they do that only once at rule
creation.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 12:18 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Crawford, Scott crawfo...@evangel.edu wrote:
From their description, what that does is look up
the name to IP address(es), and then uses that to drive the
firewall rule. Which is useful, don't get me wrong, but if the
CDN varies the IP address (as some of them
As one person on the Register article said maybe it is time to just remove
this company's root certificate from all machines. 40 days to find out it
had issued this cert?
Jon
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Last place I worked I restricted Network Places. It is not File and Print
you need to turn off BTW.
Jon
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Darin dmche...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Recently I have been informed that having file and print sharing turned on
takes up considerable bandwidth on
Agree with all your points. I was just throwing it out there as a possibility.
If I were implementing it, I would definitely apply it only to certain ports.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 5:13 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
I expect it will take until quite a while after I'm dead for a good
replacement for the keyboard to be invented. If I'm wrong, well,
that'd be cool.
Kurt
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 13:29, Greg Olson gol...@markettools.com wrote:
KeyboardHow Quaint..
-Scotty
The XJ switch is very important if you're going to target either
c:\users or c:\documents and settings in Win7.
That is all.
Kurt
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
---
To manage subscriptions click
Yup. Although this was first sussed out by Vista users...
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
The XJ switch is very important if you're going to target either
c:\users or c:\documents and settings in Win7.
That is all.
Kurt
~ Finally, powerful
50 matches
Mail list logo
