Re: Help w/DNS MX records

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Richard McClary wrote: [quotes reordered for editorial convenience] > Sorry about using the term “MIP”, but someone else realized I was using > Juniper and answered those questions. I was guessing from context anyway, but as we all know, guessing is usually not

Re: Wireless AP choice

Cool article, but it's not a complete test. I wonder how the units do in a dense environment - that is, how many clients can a WAP (ruckus or other) support in a business environment? Kurt On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Stefan Jafs wrote: > Thanks, regardless, I have a quote from Motorola, a

Re: Personal Gmail and Blocking user from attaching documents.

Sorry, I mean to say best ways to block uploading to cloud drivers from user download attachments via OWA.. On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Max Tork wrote: > "Entity" level. > > It's new in Server T100 > > -Max > > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 2:50 PM, William Robbins wrote: > >> Is that domain, or

Re: Personal Gmail and Blocking user from attaching documents.

Note: Your AD must be at the "Self Aware" functional level for this GPO to take effect. -Max On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Lora Cates wrote: > Perhaps, but Skynet isn't... > > -lc > > -- > *From:* Micheal Espinola Jr > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Sent:* Wed

Re: Personal Gmail and Blocking user from attaching documents.

Perhaps, but Skynet isn't...   -lc > > From: Micheal Espinola Jr >To: NT System Admin Issues >Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 11:37 AM >Subject: Re: Personal Gmail and Blocking user from attaching documents. > > >Asimov would be dissapoint. > >-- >Espi > >  > > >

Re: Wireless AP choice

Thanks, regardless, I have a quote from Motorola, and getting one from HP and Ruckus, then I'll make the decision. Here is some of the test results that he showed me from Tom's hardware: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/beamforming-wifi-ruckus,2390.html Stefan On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:21 P

Re: Wireless AP choice

I saw the graphs when I was looking at vendors but the management sold me. I use HP/3COM switches here but didn't select HP wireless. >>> Steve Ens 5/16/2012 12:35 PM >>> Exactly. I like the vendor's presentations where they don't compare to other products. On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:29 AM,

Re: Wireless AP choice

I drive my Ruckus to work... On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Jonathan Link wrote: > No need to raise a Ruckus about it. > > (Someone had to say it.) > > > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Matthew W. Ross < > mr...@ephrataschools.org> wrote: > >> Indeed. >> >> Ruckus does have a good product. T

Re: Wireless AP choice

No need to raise a Ruckus about it. (Someone had to say it.) On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Matthew W. Ross wrote: > Indeed. > > Ruckus does have a good product. The range is impressive on their APs with > their "beam-forming" technology... > > But it is still a sales pitch. Who's to say that

Re: Wireless AP choice

Indeed. Ruckus does have a good product. The range is impressive on their APs with their "beam-forming" technology... But it is still a sales pitch. Who's to say that a competitor doesn't have the same/simular technology? (Please note: We are going with Ruckus for our Wifi solution.) --Matt

Re: Wireless AP choice

Exactly. I like the vendor's presentations where they don't compare to other products. On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Ben Scott wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Stefan Jafs > wrote: > > Apparently by his graphs they outperform anything else on the > > market, Aruba, Cisco, HP, BTW

Re: Wireless AP choice

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Stefan Jafs wrote: > Apparently by his graphs they outperform anything else on the > market, Aruba, Cisco, HP, BTW he really dismissed Meraki as a “consumer” > product. Vendor says his product is better than everyone else's. Film at 11. ;-) -- Ben ~ Final

Re: Personal Gmail and Blocking user from attaching documents.

It's a machine policy...duh.  ;)   -lc > > From: Steven M. Caesare >To: NT System Admin Issues >Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 9:25 AM >Subject: RE: Personal Gmail and Blocking user from attaching documents. > > >What’s the GPO setting for that? >  >-sc >  >From

Re: Wireless AP choice

Just had an 1-1/2 hour demo by the local Ruckus rep here in Toronto. I have to say I'm quite impressed, if half of what he said is true it seems to be a great product. Apparently by his graphs they outperform anything else on the market, Aruba, Cisco, HP, BTW he really dismissed Meraki as a “consum

Re: MakeTxt.exe or Equivalent

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Robert Jackson wrote: > We dynamically build up a %PATH% location and store into a variable. I'm still not quite sure what you mean there. :-) I'm getting the feeling there's a larger problem wrapped around this one which may be relevant and/or solved a better

RE: Help w/DNS MX records

OK, you were right about not being able to add "faxcore1.mwro.aspca.org. MX 10 faxcore1.mwro.aspca.org." being broken. Things with Cogent got straightened out, so I've added that record. faxcore1.mrwo.aspca.org. IN MX 10 faxcore1.mwro.aspca.org

RE: Personal Gmail and Blocking user from attaching documents.

I think that is in the Users Settings section something like Terminate All User Processes. A value of 2 causes a Forced Termination. Carl Webster Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional http://www.CarlWebster.com From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesa

Re: Personal Gmail and Blocking user from attaching documents.

Chutes and ladders? -Maximus Q. Tork -maxt...@gmail.com -(704)MAX-TORK On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Mack Bolan wrote: > SCSI, UART, Taliban, War on drugs, Watergate, snakes on a plane? > > Mack S. Bolan > > > > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 6:39 PM, justino garcia > wrote: > >> Dropbox goog

RE: MakeTxt.exe or Equivalent

Trivially done in PowerShell, assuming your requirements are completely stated. C:\scripts\Stripcrlf.ps1 Param( [string]$path ) $path = $path.Replace( [char]0x0a, '' ) $path = $path.Replace( [char]0x0d, '' ) return $path >From cmd.exe Powershell -nologo -fi

RE: MakeTxt.exe or Equivalent

A trivial Powershell script should be able to do this. Cheers, Phil -- Phil Randal Infrastructure Engineer Hoople Ltd | Thorn Office Centre | Hereford HR2 6JT Tel: 01432 260415 | Email: phil.ran...@hoopleltd.co.uk -Original Message- From: Robert Jackson [mailto:r...@walkermartyn.co.uk]

RE: MakeTxt.exe or Equivalent

Hi Ben, Many thanks for the reply. We dynamically build up a %PATH% location and store into a variable. At this point the content of that variable is a string that occupies a number of lines. The contents of the variable are then passed through MakeTxt.exe and the resultant output is a variable of

Re: MakeTxt.exe or Equivalent

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Robert Jackson wrote: > We are using a program MakeTxt.exe to strip out CR/LF’s from > a path string we build up. Can you please give some context for that. I don't really get what's going on. The "FOR" built-in command can be used to read lines from a file

Re: Help w/DNS MX records

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 6:04 AM, Richard McClary wrote: > I was “distracted” by the presence of the trailing dots rather than the > absence of anything meaningful (like a domain name) prior to the dot. The two things are related. When it comes to a DNS server, unqualified names typically get th

MakeTxt.exe or Equivalent

We are using a program MakeTxt.exe to strip out CR/LF's from a path string we build up. This command works fine up to Windows 2003. I am in the process of now building a Windows 2008 R2 server and find that I cannot use the program as it is not compatible with 64bit. As far as I can see, I cannot s

RE: Help w/DNS MX records

Thanks, I believe I'd finally figured this out... I was "distracted" by the presence of the trailing dots rather than the absence of anything meaningful (like a domain name) prior to the dot. SO, the original MX, "faxcore1.mwro.", did nothing (but it did not get in the way or otherwise break th

RE: Windows Server Backup BSOD

IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL is almost always a driver issue. E.g. the driver has some data paged to disk and needs to retrieve it. This is handled by a Dispatch level interrupt. However if the driver has already raised the IRQ level above Dispatch level, then then dispatch level interrupt is masked,