I'm looking for some information please.
We are coming to the end of our token activation (expiry date on back of
token is almost here!). As we originally took them out over a 3 year
period, this will be the first time we have had to go through a token
renewal process. However we are being
Have a look at PhoneFactor, which is now owned by Microsoft. We dumped SecurID
a couple of years ago, and haven't looked back.
From: Robert Jackson [mailto:r...@walkermartyn.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 6:10 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RSA SecurID Token Renewal
Importance: High
http://www.brianmadden.com/blogs/brianmadden/archive/2013/04/15/rethinking-network-security-all-your-on-premises-wifi-users-are-actually-quot-remote-quot-users.aspx
--
*James Rankin*
Technical Consultant (ACA, CCA, MCTS)
http://appsensebigot.blogspot.co.uk
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security
The token is hardware. The maintenance contract is for software support
(and possibly hardware failure replacement), it doesn't cover end of life
hardware.
No, the supplier is not trying to screw you over.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Robert Jackson r...@walkermartyn.co.ukwrote:
I’m
Many thanks for the feedback. Much appreciated.
From: Kevin Lundy [mailto:klu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday 15 April 2013 13:34
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: RSA SecurID Token Renewal
The token is hardware. The maintenance contract is for software support
(and possibly hardware
It seems this is only an issue with win 7, correct?
Joe Heaton
Enterprise Server Support
CA Department of Fish and Wildlife
1807 13th Street, Suite 201
Sacramento, CA 95811
Desk: (916) 323-1284
From: Greg Sweers [mailto:gswe...@acts360.com]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 9:46 AM
To: Heaton,
It is not all that bad at least if you only have a few. I did it on Friday for
one laptop and have another to do tonight. It does require a reboot. You will
have more fun finding the patch to uninstall than the actual uninstall. Jon
From: gswe...@acts360.com
To:
Plus they pulled it and re-issued a fixed patch.
John W. Cook
Network Operations Manager
Partnership For Strong Families
5950 NW 1st Place
Gainesville, Fl 32607
Office (352) 244-1610
Cell (352) 215-6944
MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, CompTIA A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4
From: Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife
And with a handful of third party apps on Win 7, such as Kapersky. Many
Win7 not affected at all.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
From: Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife [mailto:joseph.hea...@wildlife.ca.gov]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 14:40
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: BSOD patch,
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 2:46 PM, John Cook john.c...@pfsf.org wrote:
Plus they pulled it and re-issued a fixed patch.
If you already installed the broken patch, will the patched patch
install to patch it?
-- Ben
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:23 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:
http://www.brianmadden.com/blogs/brianmadden/archive/2013/04/15/rethinking-network-security-all-your-on-premises-wifi-users-are-actually-quot-remote-quot-users.aspx
--
James Rankin
Technical Consultant (ACA, CCA, MCTS)
I've had several issues with his thinking in the last couple of years.
Don't get me wrong - in his subject area (which I typically think of as
VDI/RDS/Citrix) he's a really smart cookie. But he's been veering into the wild
blue yonder on other things...
-Original Message-
From: Kurt
This might explain his thinking on this particular subject - as a
VDI/RDS/Citrix kinda guy, he lives in a space where data doesn't leave
the servers, mostly.
Kurt
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Michael B. Smith
mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
I've had several issues with his thinking in the
The biggest problem I see with the new perimeter discussions is that
people keep advocating leaving the old perimeter. That's the part that
always gets me.
Acknowledging that data protection is best done near the data container is
fine. Abandoning all other posts, some of which contain other
Agreed.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote:
The biggest problem I see with the new perimeter discussions is that
people keep advocating leaving the old perimeter. That's the part that
always gets me.
Acknowledging that data protection is best done
My thoughts:
a) One size fits all solutions simply don't fit most organisations. Some
e.g.:
a.(e.g. you support users connecting from home today, so obviously
you can obviously scale to support the entire organisation doing the same at
work, or
b. give each user their own
One of the things I saw in the article was part of his reasoning on this was
the BYOD movement. I know a lot of places are looking at this and some have
even gone for it but if it was a financial firm or a health care provider I
don't know if I would want to do business with them. BYOD just
17 matches
Mail list logo
