sounds awfully like you have an IOS 6 device in the house thats hammering
Exchange. I'd run the activesync ps script & resort by # of hits to
Exchange & upgrade those baddies to at least 6.1 or disable EAS for those
users to provide relief temporarily until you can perform the device
upgrade. We ha
Hi Bill,
Macos-x-server mailing list (macos-x-ser...@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/macos-x-server/ganymededl%40gmail.com
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 11:45 PM, Bill Humphries wrote:
> I wouldn't mind really knowing where this
for WP7 that will rock. HTC has a couple of
> new ones, but I think Nokia will out do them hardware wise...
>
> -Marc
>
> Signed,
> Marc Maiffret
> Founder/CTO
> eEye Digital Security
> WEB: http://www.eEye.com
> BLOG: http://blog.eeye.com
> TWITTER: http://twitter
John et others
which model of WinMo are you using & in your opnion best Win7 Phone to get?
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:52 AM, John Hornbuckle <
john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us> wrote:
> Wait for what, though? It was a solid platform out of the gate (I’ve had a
> WP7 phone for nearly a year). Wit
I'm trying to run the Recipient Policy conflict ps here
http://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/scriptcenter/3e407220-3330-4174-8ec1-fdf163dbc73c
and
it outputs to terminal just fine but I've tried | output-file c:\blah.txt or
using pipe > and neither is writing output to file. I'm sure its something
rables/32540/BlackBerry_Enterprise_Server_for_Microsoft_Exchange-Maintenance_Release_Notes--1766981-0808012817-001-5.0.3-US.pdf
>
> * *
>
> *ASB* *http://about.me/Andrew.S.Baker* *Harnessing the Advantages of
> Technology for the SMB market…
>
> *
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:29 PM, David Liu wrote:
>
&g
Let me rephrase, are the BES MR cumulative? e.g. installation of MR4
automatically instals all updates/fixes from previous maintenance releases?
Thanks
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:26 PM, David Liu wrote:
> btw, 5.03 MR4 has just been released and I notice that prerequisite appears
> you h
ug 14, 2011 at 12:51 AM, David Liu wrote:
> I think bas only if u have bes running on it...my reading of this is that
> 5.03 MR3 fixes the vulnerability among other things & that the ISSU is only
> applicable for 5.01 and 5.0.2
>
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Martin Blacksto
I think bas only if u have bes running on it...my reading of this is that
5.03 MR3 fixes the vulnerability among other things & that the ISSU is only
applicable for 5.01 and 5.0.2
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Martin Blackstone wrote:
> Fix is easy. Lay down a couple of replacement files and r
with cloud-based AV offerings, how does one deploy emergency def's specific
to, say, inhouse infections?
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Martin Blackstone wrote:
> Other than MS with Intune, who else is offering a cloud based corporate AV
> solution.
>
> With so many remote users that rarely
But doesn¹t this also cause prolonged delay for mobile users who take their
systems off site, when their laptops cannot connect to the network to
process GPO¹s? Or do you have separate policies for desktops vs. laptops?
From: Don Guyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: NT Issues
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 20
If you set a deadline to a past expiration date & the patch requires a
reboot, it will boot automatically unless the users kill the wuauserv
service. Most won¹t know how.
From: Sam Cayze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: NT System Admin Issues
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:45:26 -0400
To: NT System Adm
In this case, is there a performance hit difference between having 50+
subfolders under the Mailbox vs. having them under the Inbox ? We haave
Symantec¹s Enterprise Vault in place to archive items in the mailbox but
thus far we¹ve been telling users to either create subfolders under the
mailbox or
13 matches
Mail list logo
