... you'll find a lot of him out there!
a
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 February 2011 18:02
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Brian Krebs on security
To address Mr. Lum's second question specifically: If you're askin
Issues
Subject: RE: Brian Krebs on security
The comment that it's purely a rollup of security fixes is pretty far off
base though IMO.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Se
Issues
Subject: RE: Brian Krebs on security
The comment that it's purely a rollup of security fixes is pretty far off base
though IMO...
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com<mailto:br...@briandesmond.com>
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Michael B. Smith [
Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Brian Krebs on security
I think that Krebs comments were even handed and reasonable - except that I
disagree with his conclusion.
As always, update your OTHER software first, to ensure that it's compatible
with "the latest and greatest". The Microsoft ecos
Systems, Networks, & Security
' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! '
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 12:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Brian Krebs on security
I gotta agree with Steven’s view on th
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Steven Peck wrote:
> Sure, but someone says the same thing every time Microsoft releases a
> service pack. When Service Pack 2 comes out, we will see a similar post
> from 'someone' saying much the same thing.
The fact that it's been said before doesn't mean i
n Issues
Subject: Re: Brian Krebs on security
Sure, but someone says the same thing every time Microsoft releases a
service pack. When Service Pack 2 comes out, we will see a similar post
from 'someone' saying much the same thing.
Testing over phased periods is what we do as well. La
hael B. Smith
>
> Consultant and Exchange MVP
>
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com
>
>
>
> *From:* Steven Peck [mailto:sep...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, February 28, 2011 11:46 AM
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Brian Krebs on security
>
>
>
&
Issues
Subject: Re: Brian Krebs on security
There is nothing he says that some unimpressed "cool kid" says every time
Microsoft releases a service pack. His objections are edge case which people
should be reading in the release notes before installing in an enterprise
anyway.
We
There is nothing he says that some unimpressed "cool kid" says every time
Microsoft releases a service pack. His objections are edge case which
people should be reading in the release notes before installing in an
enterprise anyway.
We'll probably do what we normally do. Drop it on our own group
I'd say, read what he wrote and decide whether or not you agree with it for
yourself.
Name trusting can only get you so far. I see what he says, and I know that
many are gunshy about service packs and patches, but I've been fine with
patches for Windows 2003 and later, by simply testing them out
entre, Rotherwas, Hereford, HR2 6JT
Tel: 01432 260160
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: 28 February 2011 14:06
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Brian Krebs on security
Susan Bradley - a name I trust - posted the below to the patch management list.
I have heard of Brian and read
Susan Bradley - a name I trust - posted the below to the patch management list.
I have heard of Brian and read a few of his posts, have any of you had any
direct interactions with this guy?
What I'm really asking is if I should weigh his opinion similar to Susan, or
Michael B Smith, and a few o
13 matches
Mail list logo
