Re: DPM 2007 vs BUE/Commvault/etc ?

2008-03-03 Thread Jeremy Young
t; > And for only 1000% of the price! :-P > > > > *From:* Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] > *Sent:* Thursday, February 28, 2008 9:09 PM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: DPM 2007 vs BUE/Commvaul

RE: DPM 2007 vs BUE/Commvault/etc ?

2008-02-29 Thread Tim Vander Kooi
Sorry man, but Shook already trademarked Good Thing back in '83. From: Eric E Eskam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 1:33 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: DPM 2007 vs BUE/Commvault/etc ? "Steve Ens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 0

Re: DPM 2007 vs BUE/Commvault/etc ?

2008-02-29 Thread Eric E Eskam
"Steve Ens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/29/2008 02:14:38 PM: > DPM uses shadow copy from what I've gleaned...gives you much > more flexibility when it comes to restores... Actually, they both provide similar functionality for restores - they just use different methods to provide it. Commva

RE: DPM 2007 vs BUE/Commvault/etc ?

2008-02-29 Thread Roger Wright
To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: DPM 2007 vs BUE/Commvault/etc ? One of the real beauties of DPM, end users can do their own restores, and if you have used VSS in the past there is no change for your users. Really slick. TVK From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday

RE: DPM 2007 vs BUE/Commvault/etc ?

2008-02-29 Thread Roger Wright
es Subject: RE: DPM 2007 vs BUE/Commvault/etc ? And for only 1000% of the price! :-P From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 9:09 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: DPM 2007 vs BUE/Commvault/etc ? CV can do the same as DPM and probably be

RE: DPM 2007 vs BUE/Commvault/etc ?

2008-02-29 Thread Tim Vander Kooi
ter than BEU? - Jer Tim Vander Kooi wrote: > > And for only 1000% of the price! :-P > > > > *From:* Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Thursday, February 28, 2008 9:09 PM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: DPM 2007 vs BUE/Commvault/etc ? > > >

Re: DPM 2007 vs BUE/Commvault/etc ?

2008-02-29 Thread Steve Ens
tter than BEU? > > - Jer > > Tim Vander Kooi wrote: > > > > And for only 1000% of the price! :-P > > > > > > > > *From:* Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > *Sent:* Thursday, February 28, 2008 9:09 PM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues &

Re: DPM 2007 vs BUE/Commvault/etc ?

2008-02-29 Thread Jeremy Young
unt of storage to do DPM anyway? Is there something about CV that handles it better than BEU? - Jer Tim Vander Kooi wrote: And for only 1000% of the price! :-P *From:* Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Thursday, February 28, 2008 9:09 PM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:*

RE: DPM 2007 vs BUE/Commvault/etc ?

2008-02-29 Thread Tim Vander Kooi
And for only 1000% of the price! :-P From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 9:09 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: DPM 2007 vs BUE/Commvault/etc ? CV can do the same as DPM and probably better... On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Roger Wright

RE: DPM 2007 vs BUE/Commvault/etc ?

2008-02-28 Thread Michael B. Smith
: Thursday, February 28, 2008 10:09 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: DPM 2007 vs BUE/Commvault/etc ? CV can do the same as DPM and probably better... On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Roger Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We're in the middle of a evaluation of BUE12 and althou

Re: DPM 2007 vs BUE/Commvault/etc ?

2008-02-28 Thread Don Ely
CV can do the same as DPM and probably better... On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Roger Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We're in the middle of a evaluation of BUE12 and although it works okay, > I'm disappointed that it can only send 1 job at a time to tape. With > over 2.5 TBs on 25+ server

DPM 2007 vs BUE/Commvault/etc ?

2008-02-28 Thread Roger Wright
We're in the middle of a evaluation of BUE12 and although it works okay, I'm disappointed that it can only send 1 job at a time to tape. With over 2.5 TBs on 25+ servers, it would be great to be able to backup to disk to minimize the backup window and speed restores, and then archive to tape as co