--- Benjamin Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Ivan von Winlamerberg wrote:
> > By definition term "Fragmentation" doesn't apply to a
> journalling FS.
>
> I am curious as to what definition(s) of "fragmentation" or
> "journalling"
> that statement is true. All a journal
Title: RE: RE: Defrag: is it necessary for NTFS?
I haven't as yet defragged my servers, which probably need it more than my desktops. But I can definitely tell when I log into a desktop that needs defragging. I can hear the drives churning. Desktops are all nt4 w/ ntfs.
-Ori
an half the previous time to open the same
files.
ralph
Reply Separator____
Subject: RE: Defrag: is it necessary for NTFS?
Author: NT System Admin Issues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 08/27/2001 2:22 PM
but when the drives get full, the whole systems bo
space to operate in.
Erich
-Original Message-
From: Josu Lekaroz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 2:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Defrag: is it necessary for NTFS?
Maybe the benefits exist but I have never had to defrag a drive on NT.
Perhaps someone
uot;NT System Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2001 11:45 PM
Subject: RE: Defrag: is it necessary for NTFS?
>
> --- "Andrew S. Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > File fragmentation has a negative impact on performance, because
--- "Andrew S. Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Defragging is necessary and can easily be proven.
>
> Anyone on this list who has defragged a heavily fragmented
> disk/partition can attest to this.
thanx.
=
<--65--->
This email is
: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2001 4:56 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Defrag: is it necessary for NTFS?
Defragging is necessary and can easily be proven.
Anyone on this list who has defragged a heavily fragmented
disk/partition can atte
==
"If it jams -- force it. It needed replacing anyway."
>-Original Message-
>From: Ivan von Winlamerberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2001 5:46 PM
>To: NT System Admin Issues
>Subject: RE: Defrag:
--- "Andrew S. Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> File fragmentation has a negative impact on performance, because
> it
> makes reading files much much harder.
>
> Regular defragmentation allows the drive and the OS to make
> better use
> of caching for file reads, among other things.
OK, than
st 25, 2001 1:28 AM
>To: NT System Admin Issues
>Subject: RE: Defrag: is it necessary for NTFS?
>
>
>
>--- "Andrew S. Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What would journaling have to do with Fragmentation?
>
>Thank you for correcting me. The question wa
--- "Andrew S. Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What would journaling have to do with Fragmentation?
Thank you for correcting me. The question was incorrect. So, why
do we worry about all those de-fraggers? I saw all those post
about scheduling the defrag... it's not that I know in depth abo
August 24, 2001 10:40 PM
>To: NT System Admin Issues
>Subject: Defrag: is it necessary for NTFS?
>
>
>NTFS is a journalling FS, so why defrag at all?
>
>Sorry for a lame q'n.
>
>Unless it's not really a journalling FS...
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
NTFS is a journalling FS, so why defrag at all?
Sorry for a lame q'n.
Unless it's not really a journalling FS...
=
<--65--->
This email is intended to be received by the intended recipient only. If the sender
misdirected this email to
Doesnt remove the "white space" in the FS ?
-Original Message-
From: Ivan von Winlamerberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 22:40
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Defrag: is it necessary for NTFS?
NTFS is a journalling FS, so why defrag at all?
S
14 matches
Mail list logo
