[mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Fri, 11 Jan 2013
07:50:40 -0800
Subject: FoxIT reader vulnerability
> Greetings!
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/01/11/foxit_pdf_plugin_vuln/
>
> Just now checked the FoxIT web site. The currently offered version is
> 5.4.4.1128,
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Richard McClary
wrote:
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/01/11/foxit_pdf_plugin_vuln/
>
> Just now checked the FoxIT web site. The currently offered version is
> 5.4.4.1128, which the article mentions as being vulnerable (as are older
> versions).
>
> May end u
em Admin Issues
[mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Tue, 15 Jan 2013
14:46:31 -0800
Subject: Re: FoxIT reader vulnerability
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Richard McClary
> wrote:
> > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/01/11/foxit_pdf_plugin_vuln/
> >
> > Just now che
E-reader...although for all I know they do extra crap too.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 3:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: FoxIT reader vulnerability
Doesn't Adobe (and possibly other PDF vi
o Ill effects.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 5:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: FoxIT reader vulnerability
Doesn't Adobe (and possibly other PDF viewers) include PDF rendering with
javascript no
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Matthew W. Ross
wrote:
> Doesn't Adobe (and possibly other PDF viewers) include PDF rendering
> with javascript now?
>
> I just want a "dumb" .pdf reader. Is it just me?
The real irony here is that Adobe originally created PDF to be a
"safe" version of PostScrip
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Ben Scott wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Matthew W. Ross
> wrote:
>> Doesn't Adobe (and possibly other PDF viewers) include PDF rendering
>> with javascript now?
>>
>> I just want a "dumb" .pdf reader. Is it just me?
>
> The real irony here is that Ad
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 7:51 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: FoxIT reader vulnerability
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Ben Scott wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Matthew W. Ross
> wrote:
>> Doesn't Adobe (and possibly other PDF viewers) include
d 8008 assembler.
>
> Forth's RPN and its low-level power made me feel as if I could do anything! :)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 7:51 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: FoxIT reade
:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: FoxIT reader vulnerability
Doesn't Adobe (and possibly other PDF viewers) include PDF rendering with
javascript now?
I just want a "dumb" .pdf reader. Is it just me?
--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District
- Original Message -
, January 15, 2013 9:49 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: FoxIT reader vulnerability
I took USCD Pascal, RPG III, COBOL, Fortran, 360 assembler, JCL and probably a
couple of other languages as well in a failed attempt at an Associates about
then.
I heard of the language about then as well
27;t know. But the
conversation is interesting to me.
--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District
- Original Message -
From: Ziots, Edward
[mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org]
To: NT System Admin Issues
[mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Wed, 16 Jan 2013
02:39:02 -0800
Subject: RE
-Original Message-
From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 11:33 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: FoxIT reader vulnerability
I'm no security expert, but here's a counterpoint on why Adobe Reader would be
(in my m
On 15 Jan 2013 at 15:29, Matthew W. Ross wrote:
> Doesn't Adobe (and possibly other PDF viewers) include PDF rendering with
> javascript now?
>
> I just want a "dumb" .pdf reader. Is it just me?
Try SumatraPDF -- very lightweight. Browser plugin available, but you can turn
that off. It's wha
14 matches
Mail list logo
