Re: Intel pulls a fast one in Sandy Bridge fiasco | Processors - InfoWorld

2011-02-09 Thread Jon Harris
If they are still in business you mean? Jon On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Steven Peck wrote: > Of course they aren't. There is an entire engineering support division for > this sales and support and that's what they do. But as I and some other > have said, in certain configurations the af

Re: Intel pulls a fast one in Sandy Bridge fiasco | Processors - InfoWorld

2011-02-09 Thread Steven Peck
Of course they aren't. There is an entire engineering support division for this sales and support and that's what they do. But as I and some other have said, in certain configurations the affected options may not have any built configuration that will expose the issue. If an issue does arise, th

Re: Intel pulls a fast one in Sandy Bridge fiasco | Processors - InfoWorld

2011-02-09 Thread Andrew S. Baker
strict > > > - Original Message - > From: Andrew S. Baker > [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] > To: NT System Admin Issues > [mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] > Sent: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 > 08:56:56 -0800 > Subject: Re: Intel pulls a fast one in Sandy Bridge fiasco

Re: Intel pulls a fast one in Sandy Bridge fiasco | Processors - InfoWorld

2011-02-09 Thread Matthew W. Ross
Issues [mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] Sent: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 08:56:56 -0800 Subject: Re: Intel pulls a fast one in Sandy Bridge fiasco | Processors - InfoWorld > I'm not suggesting a hush-hush fix as an alternative. > > I'm saying that they looked like they were

Re: Intel pulls a fast one in Sandy Bridge fiasco | Processors - InfoWorld

2011-02-09 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Steven Peck wrote: > While Intel does make and ship motherboards, they ship far more chip-sets > then motherboards.  The announcement makes sense for those configurations > that do not leverage certain of the problematic chip-set capabilities. While true, consid

Re: Intel pulls a fast one in Sandy Bridge fiasco | Processors - InfoWorld

2011-02-09 Thread Andrew S. Baker
ows? > > > --Matt Ross > Ephrata School District > > > - Original Message - > From: Andrew S. Baker > [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] > To: NT System Admin Issues > [mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] > Sent: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 > 08:32:04 -0800

RE: Intel pulls a fast one in Sandy Bridge fiasco | Processors - InfoWorld

2011-02-09 Thread Erik Goldoff
ent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 11:32 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Intel pulls a fast one in Sandy Bridge fiasco | Processors - InfoWorld I'll bet it's more nuanced than that. Intel gets the benefit of public disclosure of a big and costly problem, BUT, at the 11th hour,

Re: Intel pulls a fast one in Sandy Bridge fiasco | Processors - InfoWorld

2011-02-09 Thread Matthew W. Ross
Original Message - From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] To: NT System Admin Issues [mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] Sent: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 08:32:04 -0800 Subject: Re: Intel pulls a fast one in Sandy Bridge fiasco | Processors - InfoWorld > I'll bet it's mo

Re: Intel pulls a fast one in Sandy Bridge fiasco | Processors - InfoWorld

2011-02-09 Thread Steven Peck
TA ports, >> or we'll get an additional SATA controller". >> >> *shrug* >> >> >> --Matt Ross >> Ephrata School District >> >> >> - Original Message - >> From: Andrew S. Baker >> [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] >>

Re: Intel pulls a fast one in Sandy Bridge fiasco | Processors - InfoWorld

2011-02-09 Thread Andrew S. Baker
@gmail.com] > To: NT System Admin Issues > [mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] > Sent: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 > 07:40:42 -0800 > Subject: Intel pulls a fast one in Sandy Bridge fiasco | > Processors - InfoWorld > > > > > http://www.infoworld.com/t/processor

Re: Intel pulls a fast one in Sandy Bridge fiasco | Processors - InfoWorld

2011-02-09 Thread RichardMcClary
rough 6th SATA ports, or we'll get an additional SATA controller". *shrug* --Matt Ross Ephrata School District - Original Message - From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] To: NT System Admin Issues [mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] Sent: Wed, 09 Feb 20

Re: Intel pulls a fast one in Sandy Bridge fiasco | Processors - InfoWorld

2011-02-09 Thread Harry Singh
n@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] > Sent: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 > 07:40:42 -0800 > Subject: Intel pulls a fast one in Sandy Bridge fiasco | > Processors - InfoWorld > > > > > http://www.infoworld.com/t/processors/intel-pulls-fast-one-in-sandy-bridge-fiasco-784?elq=true#com

Re: Intel pulls a fast one in Sandy Bridge fiasco | Processors - InfoWorld

2011-02-09 Thread Matthew W. Ross
s Ephrata School District - Original Message - From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] To: NT System Admin Issues [mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] Sent: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 07:40:42 -0800 Subject: Intel pulls a fast one in Sandy Bridge fiasco | Processors - InfoWorld >

Re: Intel pulls a fast one in Sandy Bridge fiasco | Processors - InfoWorld

2011-02-09 Thread Andrew S. Baker
Always welcome. *ASB *(Find me online via About.Me ) *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage... * On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Harry Singh wrote: > Thanks for this ASB. > > > > On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Andrew S. Baker wrote: > >> >> h

Re: Intel pulls a fast one in Sandy Bridge fiasco | Processors - InfoWorld

2011-02-09 Thread Harry Singh
Thanks for this ASB. On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Andrew S. Baker wrote: > > http://www.infoworld.com/t/processors/intel-pulls-fast-one-in-sandy-bridge-fiasco-784?elq=true#comment-33801 > > Be careful if you're in the market for a high-end Intel-based motherboard > in the near term...*[1]*