Re: Big brother, not many care that he's here.

2011-12-07 Thread Angus Scott-Fleming
In related news today: = Included Stuff Follows = A Voice Crying in the Wilderness This story was linked to on the Drudge Report this morning, and I was able to read it earlier, but I suspect that the site is overloaded as it no longer loads: Library of

Re: Big brother, not many care that he's here.

2011-12-07 Thread David
H. I don't use Twitter so I'm at a disadvantage. But would this be different than declaring all e-mail to be in the public interest? And how do they get to sign 'an agreement' to do that? Has the user agreement always included this potential provision?? DAF On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 3:34

RE: Big brother, not many care that he's here.

2011-12-07 Thread Crawford, Scott
, December 07, 2011 6:24 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Big brother, not many care that he's here. H. I don't use Twitter so I'm at a disadvantage. But would this be different than declaring all e-mail to be in the public interest? And how do they get to sign 'an agreement' to do

Re: Big brother, not many care that he's here.

2011-12-02 Thread Jonathan Link
Please stand by. The thought police are en route. On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 10:21 AM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote: This CarrierIQ thing brings up a thought. With a smartphones and other current technology it is now entirely possible to have your every action recorded. Who you talk to,

RE: Big brother, not many care that he's here.

2011-12-02 Thread Jeff Brown
If you have something to hide... be uncomfortable. They are coming. From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 9:21 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Big brother, not many care that he's here. This CarrierIQ thing brings up a thought. With a smartphones

RE: Big brother, not many care that he's here.

2011-12-02 Thread John Cook
] Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 10:57 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Big brother, not many care that he's here. Please stand by. The thought police are en route. On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 10:21 AM, David Lum david@nwea.orgmailto:david@nwea.org wrote: This CarrierIQ thing brings

RE: Big brother, not many care that he's here.

2011-12-02 Thread Art DeKneef
Along this thought, I saw an advertisement for a new show on the History Channel starting on Thursday, Dec. 8. The premise is a group of people have to evade a group of trackers who are following them while using the available cameras to track them. Or something close to that. I think it will

Re: Big brother, not many care that he's here.

2011-12-02 Thread Andrew S. Baker
*“1984” is here, and most people couldn’t care less because the benefits of the technology outweigh any privacy concerns.* ** And that will continue to be the case until individuals encounter specific situations that impact them personally. The theoretical dangers will persuade very, very

Re: Big brother, not many care that he's here.

2011-12-02 Thread Andrew S. Baker
*If you have something to hide… be uncomfortable. They are coming.* Rather, if *they* think you have something to hide... Their perception will be our reality. * * *ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market… * On Fri, Dec 2,

Re: Big brother, not many care that he's here.

2011-12-02 Thread Steven Peck
It doesn't matter if you have nothing to hide. It doesn't. It's none of their business at all. It is a matter of evaluating companies and what they do and deciding the one that is least likely to do things you object to. If their primary business motivator is something that you find might lead

Re: Big brother, not many care that he's here.

2011-12-02 Thread Matthew W. Ross
1984 is here, and most people couldn't care less because the benefits of the technology outweigh any privacy concerns. The big difference is that the consumer has purchased Big Brother. It's not been forced on us by the government. Things like CarrierIQ are not wanted by consumers, so once

Re: Big brother, not many care that he's here.

2011-12-02 Thread Ben Scott
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 10:21 AM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote: “1984” is here, and most people couldn’t care less because the benefits of the technology outweigh any privacy concerns. Larry Niven said something along the lines of: I suspect this thing we call 'privacy' may have been a

Re: Big brother, not many care that he's here.

2011-12-02 Thread Kurt Buff
We don't call them sheeple for no reason. Kurt On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 07:21, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote: This CarrierIQ thing brings up a thought. With a smartphones and other current technology it is now entirely possible to have your every action recorded. Who you talk to, what you

Re: Big brother, not many care that he's here.

2011-12-02 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
Spread your legs and place your hands on the yellow circles. -- Espi On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 7:21 AM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote: This CarrierIQ thing brings up a thought. With a smartphones and other current technology it is now entirely possible to have your every action

RE: Big brother, not many care that he's here.

2011-12-02 Thread Ralph Smith
The big difference is that the consumer has purchased Big Brother. It's not been forced on us by the government. ParanoidMode Just because you don't know about it doesn't mean they aren't doing it ;) /ParanoidMode ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

RE: Big brother, not many care that he's here.

2011-12-02 Thread John Cook
: Friday, December 02, 2011 11:52 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Big brother, not many care that he's here. Spread your legs and place your hands on the yellow circles. -- Espi On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 7:21 AM, David Lum david@nwea.orgmailto:david@nwea.org wrote: This CarrierIQ

Re: Big brother, not many care that he's here.

2011-12-02 Thread Matthew W. Ross
@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] Sent: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 08:52:21 -0800 Subject: Re: Big brother, not many care that he's here. Spread your legs and place your hands on the yellow circles. -- Espi On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 7:21 AM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote: This CarrierIQ thing

RE: Big brother, not many care that he's here.

2011-12-02 Thread John Cook
...@ephrataschools.org] Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 12:29 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Big brother, not many care that he's here. No Sir, I am a meat popsicle. There is a special place in my heart for that movie. Over-simplistic, yet fun. Sm:)e. --Matt Ross Ephrata School District

RE: Big brother, not many care that he's here.

2011-12-02 Thread Mathew Shember
It takes less effort to wait until they are kicking down your door. Thanks, Mathew From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 8:20 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Big brother, not many care that he's here. 1984 is here, and most people couldn't

Re: Big brother, not many care that he's here.

2011-12-02 Thread Andrew S. Baker
they are kicking down your door. ** ** Thanks, Mathew ** ** *From:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, December 02, 2011 8:20 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Big brother, not many care that he's here. ** ** ***“1984” is here

Re: Big brother, not many care that he's here.

2011-12-02 Thread Jonathan Link
] *Sent:* Friday, December 02, 2011 8:20 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Big brother, not many care that he's here. ** ** ***“1984” is here, and most people couldn’t care less because the benefits of the technology outweigh any privacy concerns

RE: Big brother, not many care that he's here.

2011-12-02 Thread Sean Rector
Another option on the phone front, for many Android users is to have an Android Open Source Project ROM installed like CyanogenMod or use a Nexus phone as they are AOSP and don't include CIQ. Verizon is also stating that they do not include CIQ on their phones. Sean Rector, MCSE From:

Re: Big brother, not many care that he's here.

2011-12-02 Thread David
] *Sent:* Friday, December 02, 2011 8:20 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Big brother, not many care that he's here. ** ** ***“1984” is here, and most people couldn’t care less because the benefits of the technology outweigh any privacy concerns.* And that will continue