[mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 5:39 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 07
Allowing NDRs from <> is a requirement of the SMTP specification. As
usual, spammers abuse the spec to get away with what they want. You
need to get yours
Allowing NDRs from <> is a requirement of the SMTP specification. As
usual, spammers abuse the spec to get away with what they want. You
need to get yourself an intelligent spam filter.
--
ME2
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Benjamin Zachary -
Lists wrote:
> I have massive amounts of garbage,
Its not set as an open relay is it?
From: Benjamin Zachary - Lists [mailto:li...@levelfive.us]
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 9:03 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 07
I have a new dual core 6gb ram server running 2008-64 std, and
Exchange07-sp1.
Everything was
s.
For us this took care of 85-95% of those type of NDR's.
When we first noticed this issue I believe I googled "Message Source Name DSN".
Jim
From: Benjamin Zachary - Lists [mailto:li...@levelfive.us]
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 3:27 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Excha
so, disallow NDRs on the receive connector.
From: Benjamin Zachary - Lists [li...@levelfive.us]
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 4:27 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 07
I have massive amounts of garbage, the queues are filled with undeliverables
I have massive amounts of garbage, the queues are filled with undeliverables
from <> that have nothing but &^$^%$&^&)&#@ in them. Why would Exchange
even queue this stuff they don't even appear to be 'valid' emails with a
from/to or anything afaik.
Anyway, I have to let them go through submiss
already
closed 25 on the firewall.
From: Benjamin Zachary - Lists [mailto:li...@levelfive.us]
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 2:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 07
I don't think so, I just did 2008 std, 2007 ex w/sp1 and ran updates.
The problem is back with the
t, Im going to try smtp logging,
and maybe I clicked something to make it an open relay and its getting
pounded.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 12:27 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 07
Did you install RU8?
There
ssues
Subject: RE: Exchange 07
I'm not an Exchange wiz, so I can't help you figure out why it's at that
level-but I can tell you that I agree that seems too high.
I run Exchange 2007 for around 500 users in a Hyper-V VM on a physical server
that hosts about a dozen VM's total (web
les, well, that could explain
the issue...
Run ExBPA before you reinstall. It may be helpful.
From: Benjamin Zachary - Lists [li...@levelfive.us]
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 11:59 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 07
Nope. I upgraded the ram a
will be the 2nd
time that a brand new install has gone bad. *sigh*
I had an sbs box do similar a few weeks ago.
From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 9:21 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 07
Any anti-virus software local
Any anti-virus software locally on that server? Not anti-virus for email
scanning, but just general anti-virus software.
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Benjamin Zachary - Lists <
li...@levelfive.us> wrote:
> I have a new dual core 6gb ram server running 2008-64 std, and
> Exchange07-sp1.
I'm not an Exchange wiz, so I can't help you figure out why it's at that
level-but I can tell you that I agree that seems too high.
I run Exchange 2007 for around 500 users in a Hyper-V VM on a physical server
that hosts about a dozen VM's total (web servers, app servers, etc.) and the
CPU util
13 matches
Mail list logo
